First, I don't know WT[ ] you're talking about where considering your suggestion that I'm (being.?) relentless.
(As in, bullsh*t someone else.)
Where considering what. ? ".. discussion, forum". .. Are you in fact familiar with the concept. ?
One possible scenario, ... Someone drops up a statement. Unclear to someone other having read it. And with this idea, that other person asks the person who posted the statement, to clarify it. ("relentless". ?)
.. Specify what I don't understand. ? Fine. More essentially, your more esoteric twists along with inferences (that go nowhere.) attached (liberally.) to portions, of meteorological ideas. But with this idea let's look more specifically, at your post submitted above, isolated quoted here again just below.
With a Niño circulation in the NPAC, PNW desperately needs blocking to avoid getting pineappled.
What is ....... (? ) "a Niño circulation". ? - @
And with this, with looking at where and how you've used this phrase here above (?), .. what does, "With .. a Niño circulation .. in the NPAC", mean exactly. ?
And then (?), with these questions more specific, answered, ...
What is your more expanded reasoning / thinking, where having connected this odd statement, to the more general idea that you've suggested, following it. ? "... [the ?] PNW desperately needs blocking to avoid getting pineappled."
— I'll leave alone the idea of just how this (if more obscured.) thinking of yours here, ties in with what you'd suggested pointed to proceeding it. Or Solar activity more generally. .. Probably too much to ask, I'm guessing.