Don't let what I've said change your more basic thinking.
.. Not to worry.
— Perhaps invite, yourself, to general dissemination of the "papers" that you've had in mind, focusing on whatever other, you have.
.. A bit "Rambly", here too. ? (Oh Well.) ...
— Half-way, hmmn. (?) .. Whaah'do I have to do, step on your "foot". ?
... Essentially "Phil", I hadn't wanted to clutter up, this thread here, with your "claims" (numerous and sundry.). Nor "papers", which you evidently feel work to support whatever of them. And so, I said what I had.
— Unlike yourself, I'm not interested in "homogenizing" all concepts, either whether or both, meteorological, or climatological, in to one grand set of "claims"—supported or otherwise—here within the main general thread for PNW. (But you just really dont appear to be paying attention to anything other than your on tack. So how could you be expected to pick up on this thinking, more abstract. ? .. would be my, general impression where considering your confusion.) (Again. Oh, Well. / .. I guess you had to be there.)
.. "A time to defer. A time to not. .... " (Still nothin'. ?) @ @
.. discuss this ... / .. Maybe this would .. fit .. best ..... in the GW/CC thread...?
Only you, would know. .. My, ultimately, not really having much to go on where considering just what "this", is. (Your different various "references", even more basic above, being way, beyond, general. And certainly even approaching, expansive.)