Jump to content

Christmas Eve Potential Major Winter Storm


Tom

Recommended Posts

RGEM precip maps

 

38

 

http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/2014122300/I_nw_r1_EST_2014122300_038.png

 

40

 

http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/2014122300/I_nw_r1_EST_2014122300_040.png

 

42

 

http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/2014122300/I_nw_r1_EST_2014122300_042.png

 

44

 

http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/2014122300/I_nw_r1_EST_2014122300_044.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Money's maps... definitely came in further SE.

 

Skilling on the storm talk now. RPM shows the snow starting in NE IL around 9:30AM.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the GFS is handling the dynamic cooling that will be taken place with this system.  The rain/snow line will be hugging just to the NW of wherever this storm system tracks.  Watch the models increase snow totals as we get closer.  This will be a rapidly developing system and I've seen this before where models start off weak only to get stronger/wetter as we get closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope -- total snowfall through period.

 

I think that site uses a different algorithm. It's not factoring in the dynamics very well.

 

---

 

PGFS comes in like this.

 

Nevermind Tom posted it.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out the consistency from the GFS Parallel

 

12-22 (0z)

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfsp/2014122200/gfsp_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_12.png

 

12-22 (6z)

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfsp/2014122206/gfsp_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_11.png

 

12-22 (12z)

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfsp/2014122212/gfsp_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_10.png

 

12-22 (18z)

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfsp/2014122218/gfsp_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_9.png

 

12-23 (0z)

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfsp/2014122300/gfsp_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_8.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Added to the WWA! Tomorrow morning sounds like fun.

 

 

* FAIRLY HEAVY SNOW COULD BE FALLING IN A BAND FROM MARSHFIELD AND

WISCONSIN RAPIDS, THROUGH WAUSAU, TO WAUSAUKEE FOR THE

TUESDAY MORNING COMMUTE. THE HEAVIER SNOW WILL SHIFT INTO

NORTHERN WISCONSIN BY LATE MORNING.

 

* THE SNOW WILL START TO DIMINISH DURING THE AFTERNOON.

 

* A TOTAL SNOWFALL OF 3 TO 6 INCHES IS EXPECTED BY TUESDAY

EVENING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a friend who is flying into O'Hare from Mexico Wednesday night. I told him that he probably doesn't have much of a chance of getting in on time. While we may enjoy the snow this is going to be a giant hassle for travelers on the busiest travel day in the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a friend who is flying into O'Hare from Mexico Wednesday night. I told him that he probably doesn't have much of a chance of getting in on time. While we may enjoy the snow this is going to be a giant hassle for travelers on the busiest travel day in the year.

Yep. I wish I could be super excited about this, but knowing I'm supposed to make stops in Plainfield & Belvidere on Christmas Eve make the current trends pretty problematic.

 

So rather than super excited, I'm just a little excited. Lol

...The Artist Formerly Known as RJSnowLover...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WRF-NMM:

 

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/data/hrw-nmm/00/hrw-nmm_conus_041_1000_500_thick.gif

 

Considering we're nearing 36 hours out from the start of the precip, I'm still seeing a ton of disagreement amongst the models.  A blend of all of them would probably put MKE in a good position, but this WRF NMM you're showing is too far west to be any good and will probably cut right through MKE.  Then on the eastern fringes we have the GEM and UKIE still taking the low into E Lower Michigan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering we're nearing 36 hours out from the start of the precip, I'm still seeing a ton of disagreement amongst the models.  A blend of all of them would probably put MKE in a good position, but this WRF NMM you're showing is too far west to be any good and will probably cut right through MKE.  Then on the eastern fringes we have the GEM and UKIE still taking the low into E Lower Michigan.

 

It's because of the resolution in the models. GGEM/UKIE are more long-range models and shouldn't really be considered within 48-72 hours of events. 

 

All the hi-res models will be able to pick up on this much better because it's what they're designed for.

 

Even the often tame ARW gets the low down into the 980's in SW MI. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00z GGEM...high rez models are the way to go from now on...Global models are pretty much all in agreement on track.  High Rez models will do a much better job pin pointing the defo band/snow totals/etc

 

But will they do a good job wrt the low ratios?  We're talking perhaps 6-8:1 snow ratios, though I hope to heck I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...