BLI snowman 5825 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Low of 30 on my 30th! #firstdayofspring #wintercancel January 6 has been an unofficial first day of spring for awhile now, before mid winter's annual return in late February. Happy birthday! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuffradio 911 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 We'll be incredibly lucky to see 33 degree rain the rest of the winter, let alone snow.The first thing I wish for when I wake up in the morning is, "I hope I get 33 degree rain today!" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Deweydog 13280 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 49 at SeaTac! Quote My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad. Link to post Share on other sites
Front Ranger 7373 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 It wasn't a meridionally amplified block, though. Without the aforementioned -NAO block/NATL wave breaking, that winter would have been a zonal mess. image.pngIf you look at the time period that was cold for the PNW (late December - late January), it was definitely an amplified, full on -EPO/-PNA pattern for the most part. Given the direction weather moves, I believe the Pacific pattern is much more important for the West than the NAO. In fact, the EPO has stronger correlation for cold for the country overall than either the AO or NAO. Quote Low. Solar. Link to post Share on other sites
Snowman5678 147 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 47 at SEA at 11 a.m.Was just in Bellevue and it honestly feels like an early spring day. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Front Ranger 7373 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Low of 30 on my 30th! #firstdayofspring #wintercancelIf only you were 20 today! Happy DOB. 1 Quote Low. Solar. Link to post Share on other sites
luvssnow_seattle 1621 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 49 at SeaTac!Finally!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TT-SEA 1766 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 49 at SeaTac! Going to break that magical 50 barrier! 47 here. Time to plant the garden. Quote **REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED** Link to post Share on other sites
Jesse 7705 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Hitting 50 is pretty normal even in the middle of the winter. The fact that it seems so warm is more testament to how consistently chilly the last few weeks have been. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TT-SEA 1766 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 My lawn! Its been almost 3 weeks. 50 degrees here. From a peak of almost 14 inches on the ground just 2 days ago to this now... http://s23.postimg.org/5o776dnsr/2016_01_06_12_53_30.jpg Quote **REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED** Link to post Share on other sites
Bryant 2142 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 It's a bummer that we have the arctic air building to our North, but will be neglected due to a strong jet and Aluetian low. Our best hope is a relaxation of the jet, allowing cold air to spill south a bit, but that doesn't look likely anytime soon with the MJO over the Pacific. In a typical weak ENSO year, we could count on a jet retraction and Aluetian high (downstream trough over west) as the MJO reignited over the IO and shifted into the Maritime region in a couple weeks, but this year is very different. Strong stagnant ENSO conditions (convection/upward motion over the Pacific and suppression/downward motion over the Maritime) will cause the MJO to break down as it approaches the Maritime region, which would benefit the west. The break down is due to upper levels not supporting the convective / thunderstorm nature of the propagating wave. All in all, everything is working against us right now, but I suppose you never know! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil 10998 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 If you look at the time period that was cold for the PNW (late December - late January), it was definitely an amplified, full on -EPO/-PNA pattern for the most part. Given the direction weather moves, I believe the Pacific pattern is much more important for the West than the NAO. In fact, the EPO has stronger correlation for cold for the country overall than either the AO or NAO.Look at the meridional W/M flux integrals over the NPAC/Beaufort during that period. That ridge was flat-topped aloft via E-HEM +AAM. Without the NATL response, the result would have been something along the lines of 2014-15. Quote Personal Weather Station: NOAA: https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/timeseries.php?sid=F3819&num=168&banner=NONE Wunderground: https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62/graph/2019-08-23/2019-08-23/daily Link to post Share on other sites
Phil 10998 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Wow, just wait until this propagates poleward Some major s**t about to go down through the next 7+ weeks. Quote Personal Weather Station: NOAA: https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/timeseries.php?sid=F3819&num=168&banner=NONE Wunderground: https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62/graph/2019-08-23/2019-08-23/daily Link to post Share on other sites
Front Ranger 7373 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Look at the meridional W/M flux integrals over the NPAC/Beaufort during that period. That ridge was flat-topped aloft via E-HEM +AAM. Without the NATL response, the result would have been something along the lines of 2014-15. Ok...it's just that you said there was a "lack of NPAC blocking" in 1968-69, which was "overcome" by the -NAO. In Dec/Jan, the time period that mattered for the PNW, there was substantial NPAC blocking, and it was easily the stronger signal. Quote Low. Solar. Link to post Share on other sites
TT-SEA 1766 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 52 at SEA. Quote **REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED** Link to post Share on other sites
epiceast 270 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Over a decade now for me. When I started I only had one kid, Dewey was barely two years old, Jim was ridiculously confident about the winter to come and Tim was mowing his lawn with kitchen shears. So much has changed. Happy birthday!So that's why Tim hates the rain! Jim's way of hazing new forum members, forcing them to cut the grass on their lawn, rather than mow it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
luvssnow_seattle 1621 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Wow, just wait until this propagates poleward Some major s**t about to go down through the next 7+ weeks.image.jpegHonestly if it is really means normal status quo for us I am not sure why you are posting it here??? Not sure what your point is??? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil 10998 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Ok...it's just that you said there was a "lack of NPAC blocking" in 1968-69, which was "overcome" by the -NAO. In Dec/Jan, the time period that mattered for the PNW, there was substantial NPAC blocking, and it was easily the stronger signal. RaXhkf3WmQ.pngAnomalous ridges are not necessarily true "blocks", or complete anticyclonic breaks independent of antecedent flow. That NPAC ridge, by itself, would have done nothing for the PNW. The reason upstream blocking was able to sustain, as it did, was thanks to downstream feedback. I hope that clears things up somewhat. Quote Personal Weather Station: NOAA: https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/timeseries.php?sid=F3819&num=168&banner=NONE Wunderground: https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62/graph/2019-08-23/2019-08-23/daily Link to post Share on other sites
TT-SEA 1766 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 54 at UW in Seattle. Quote **REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED** Link to post Share on other sites
Phil 10998 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Honestly if it is really means normal status quo for us I am not sure why you are posting it here??? Not sure what your point is???What the heck are you talking about? There's nothing "status quo" about what is now ongoing. Quote Personal Weather Station: NOAA: https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/timeseries.php?sid=F3819&num=168&banner=NONE Wunderground: https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62/graph/2019-08-23/2019-08-23/daily Link to post Share on other sites
HighlandExperience 1458 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Front Ranger 7373 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Anomalous ridges are not necessarily true "blocks", or complete anticyclonic breaks independent of antecedent flow. That NPAC ridge, by itself, would have done nothing for the PNW. The reason upstream blocking was able to sustain, as it did, was thanks to downstream feedback. I hope that clears things up somewhat. Not going to argue this with you, but this seems like semantics to me. If that's not NPAC blocking, I don't know what is. And regardless of the NAO, that's the kind of blocking that usually delivers cold air to the PNW. 1 Quote Low. Solar. Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Winterdog Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 What the heck are you talking about? There's nothing "status quo" about what is now ongoing. Status Quo for us means no snow. His point is unless the graphics indicate something different for us why did you post it. Most of us have no idea what the graphic means. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Deweydog 13280 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 2016 picked nits appear very similar to 2015 models. Quote My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad. Link to post Share on other sites
Deweydog 13280 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 What the heck are you talking about? There's nothing "status quo" about what is now ongoing. Honestly if it is really means normal status quo for us I am not sure why you are posting it here??? Not sure what your point is???Status Quo for us means no snow. His point is unless the graphics indicate something different for us why did you post it. Most of us have no idea what the graphic means. I found it interesting. It's been a long time since we've had GLAAM graphics posted here with sensational text affixed to it. 1 Quote My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad. Link to post Share on other sites
Front Ranger 7373 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 This sums up the coming pattern. Off the charts (literally) Arctic blocking, but Pacific pattern means it's no good for the West. -AO is overrated. Quote Low. Solar. Link to post Share on other sites
Jesse 7705 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Still only 43 at PDX. They probably won't crack 45 today. Lots of patches/piles of snow still around in Vancouver. The heart of winter is a nice time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
luvssnow_seattle 1621 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 What the heck are you talking about? There's nothing "status quo" about what is now ongoing.Let me clarify a wee bit more... You post some graphic that most us have no clue what it is for or how to read... then post some OMG statement with no explanation what your are OMG'ing about, for or where it will impact. If it is not something that impacts our area then why in the OMF'ingG are you posting it here? If there is a correlation to our area then an explanation is needed.. Please! ... OMG! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil 10998 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Not going to argue this with you, but this seems like semantics to me. If that's not NPAC blocking, I don't know what is. And regardless of the NAO, that's the kind of blocking that usually delivers cold air to the PNW.Yes, what occurred was "blocking", but without the aforementioned downstream/NATL feedback, that block would not have occurred in the manner it did, and the end result would probably have been some sort of +PNA look. Does that make sense? Quote Personal Weather Station: NOAA: https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/timeseries.php?sid=F3819&num=168&banner=NONE Wunderground: https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62/graph/2019-08-23/2019-08-23/daily Link to post Share on other sites
Phil 10998 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 This sums up the coming pattern. Off the charts (literally) Arctic blocking, but Pacific pattern means it's no good for the West. -AO is overrated.This is hogwash. The NAM/NPAC are coupled, in this case (and in most cases). Remember the bouts of NPAC blocking back in November/December, that ultimately failed to deliver? Yeah, you can thank the +PV/+NAM for that failure. Quote Personal Weather Station: NOAA: https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/timeseries.php?sid=F3819&num=168&banner=NONE Wunderground: https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62/graph/2019-08-23/2019-08-23/daily Link to post Share on other sites
Phil 10998 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Let me clarify a wee bit more... You post some graphic that most us have no clue what it is for or how to read... then post some OMG statement with no explanation what your are OMG'ing about, for or where it will impact. If it is not something that impacts our area then why in the OMF'ingG are you posting it here? If there is a correlation to our area then an explanation is needed.. Please! ... OMG!I explained it all a page or two back. What exactly do you want me to elaborate on? Quote Personal Weather Station: NOAA: https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/timeseries.php?sid=F3819&num=168&banner=NONE Wunderground: https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62/graph/2019-08-23/2019-08-23/daily Link to post Share on other sites
Front Ranger 7373 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 This is hogwash. The NAM/NPAC are coupled, in this case (and in most cases). Remember the bouts of NPAC blocking back in November/December, that ultimately failed to deliver? Yeah, you can thank the +PV/+NAM for that failure.Nov/Dec featured weak/neutral -EPO, with neutral to occasionally moderate -PNA. It wasn't a great NPAC blocking pattern by any means. All I can say is that I've closely followed the patterns that deliver to the PNW/West over the past 20+ years, and the AO/NAO simply don't have a strong correlation to cold here. Much stronger correlation to EPO/PNA...which often do function independently of the Atlantic-side blocking. In general, we all want a blocky/slow NH pattern. That's what's most likely to deliver cold to the mid latitudes. And some of the best patterns have featured blocking across the indices AO/NAO/EPO. But a -EPO block is the one most important for the West (hard to get real cold here without upstream blocking). -AO means somewhere in the NH is getting cold, but not necessarily our part of the country. Current pattern: Exhibit A. Quote Low. Solar. Link to post Share on other sites
Phil 10998 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Nov/Dec featured weak/neutral -EPO, with neutral to occasionally moderate -PNA. It wasn't a great NPAC blocking pattern by any means.The GOA block during late November was actually 4mb stronger at its peak than the January 1969 block at its peak. All I can say is that I've closely followed the patterns that deliver to the PNW/West over the past 20+ years, and the AO/NAO simply don't have a strong correlation to cold here. Much stronger correlation to EPO/PNA...which often do function independently of the Atlantic-side blocking.That's true at face value, but you're ignoring the bigger picture in favor of isolating a single domain in an interconnected system. The NPAC and NAM are a single interactive entity. Whether or not the NAM works with/against the PNW in any given pattern is highly dependent on a slew of forcings and stochastic resonances that render the usage of the NAM sign alone useless. There are cases where a +NAM is beneficial/preferred in the PNW, and there are cases where a -NAM is beneficial/preferred. Quote Personal Weather Station: NOAA: https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/timeseries.php?sid=F3819&num=168&banner=NONE Wunderground: https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62/graph/2019-08-23/2019-08-23/daily Link to post Share on other sites
iFred 4653 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Happy birthday Jesse! Hope you and everyone else here gets a significant snow event before the season is over. The only winter thing I've enjoyed was the 30/9 day we just had. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crf450ish 487 Posted January 7, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 This Nino tied with the 97'-98' Nino per NWS spokesperson I just seen on KREM2 news here in Spoke... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Winterdog Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 This Nino tied with the 97'-98' Nino per NWS spokesperson I just seen on KREM2 news here in Spoke...Crap, now they will be going into extra innings! As an analog January 98 had a mini blast with a few teens here and December 98 wasn't bad at all. I had 10" of snow the week before Christmas and a few single digit lows. The rest of the winter sucked though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DJ Droppin 8212 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Happy Birthday 00z GFS in 54 minutes! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DJ Droppin 8212 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 7:05 PM Water Vapor Analysis12 hour Loop - http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/loops/wxloop.cgi?wv_enhanced+25I see some potential interesting developments on Water Vapor. Arctic air is trying to push back against the unusual southerly flow up into British Columbia/Alberta that has been in place the past several days. Analyzing a 12 hour loop the southern push of arctic air and drier, colder northerly flow is holding back the southerly flow and even suppressing it southward now approaching central BC/AB. Arctic air is very dense, heavy, and sometimes can shove the warmer air mass southward quite efficiently especially since it is waning now. This might be something to keep an eye on with the deeply suppressed jet.http://i.imgur.com/hFPG6ff.png Quote Link to post Share on other sites
primetime 25 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Wow, just wait until this propagates poleward Some major s**t about to go down through the next 7+ weeks.image.jpeg-NAM and STJ increase?? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Deweydog 13280 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 7:05 PM Water Vapor Analysis12 hour Loop - http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/loops/wxloop.cgi?wv_enhanced+25I see some potential interesting developments on Water Vapor. Arctic air is trying to push back against the unusual southerly flow up into British Columbia/Alberta that has been in place the past several days. Analyzing a 12 hour loop the southern push of arctic air and drier, colder northerly flow is holding back the southerly flow and even suppressing it southward now approaching central BC/AB. Arctic air is very dense, heavy, and sometimes can shove the warmer air mass southward quite efficiently especially since it is waning now. This might be something to keep an eye on with the deeply suppressed jet.http://i.imgur.com/hFPG6ff.pngSure would be nice if we had some powerful computers to run statistical scenarios as to how air masses will evolve. That would definitely be a game changer! Quote My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad. Link to post Share on other sites
Front Ranger 7373 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Sure would be nice if we had some powerful computers to run statistical scenarios as to how air masses will evolve. That would definitely be a game changer!That would take all the fun out of it, though. Quote Low. Solar. Link to post Share on other sites
Deweydog 13280 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 That would take all the fun out of it, though.I distinctly remember my grandpa knowing if it was going to snow just by looking at the color of the clouds. Quote My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad. Link to post Share on other sites
crf450ish 487 Posted January 7, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 My wife can smell the snow coming. I told her I think she's smelling the dew point... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DJ Droppin 8212 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Sure would be nice if we had some powerful computers to run statistical scenarios as to how air masses will evolve. That would definitely be a game changer!To be clear this isn't me forecasting an arctic blast or expecting it to be colder than modeled. I am merely doing real-time analysis which often times proves to be very useful and sometimes does show new developments that models do not latch onto. Anything is possible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Deweydog 13280 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 To be clear this isn't me forecasting an arctic blast or expecting it to be colder than modeled. I am merely doing real-time analysis which often times proves to be very useful and sometimes does show new developments that models do not latch onto. Anything is possible.Expect the unexpected! 00z is running. Quote My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad. Link to post Share on other sites
TT-SEA 1766 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Expect the unexpected! 00z is running. Split flow? Some ridging? Weak system on Saturday? So many possibilities! Quote **REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED** Link to post Share on other sites
GHweatherChris 2866 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Split flow? Some ridging? Weak system on Saturday? So many possibilities! Just 3 days ago the system Saturday looked good for some snow, so quick to disappear. Stupid models. #elninosaysbyebyetowinterweather Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DJ Droppin 8212 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Might have to get the spoon out..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crf450ish 487 Posted January 7, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Pretty sweet graphic here depicting the Split flow and storm train riding into Cali... 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GHweatherChris 2866 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 7:05 PM Water Vapor Analysis12 hour Loop - http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/loops/wxloop.cgi?wv_enhanced+25I see some potential interesting developments on Water Vapor. Arctic air is trying to push back against the unusual southerly flow up into British Columbia/Alberta that has been in place the past several days. Analyzing a 12 hour loop the southern push of arctic air and drier, colder northerly flow is holding back the southerly flow and even suppressing it southward now approaching central BC/AB. Arctic air is very dense, heavy, and sometimes can shove the warmer air mass southward quite efficiently especially since it is waning now. This might be something to keep an eye on with the deeply suppressed jet.http://i.imgur.com/hFPG6ff.pngNah, if you look at the loop it definitely looks like arctic air pushing more ESE than S. Looks progged to move east to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.