Jump to content

1/9-1/10 Panhandler


jaster220

Recommended Posts

GFS still not budging.

 

But GEFS at least trying for some of us up in the Lakes. I know it doesn't help you - sorry man.

 

 

  • Like 1

Winter 2023-24 Snow Total = 53.1" (90% Normal Season)  Largest Storm: 12" (1/12-13)   Oct: 0.1 Nov: 2.9 Dec: 7.5 Jan: 31.7 Feb: 6.0 Mar: 4.3 Apr: 0.1

Avg = 59.2"  (Harrison): 2023-24 = 53.1" 

Avg = 45.0"  (KDTW): 2022-23 = 33.5"   2021-22 = 35.6"    

Avg = 49.7"  (KRMY): 2020-21 = 36.2"   2019-20 = 48.0"   2018-19 = 56.1"   2017-18 = 68.3"    2016-17 = 52"    2015-16 = 57.4"    2014-15 = 55.3"    2013-14 = 100.6" (coldest & snowiest in the modern record!)  2012-13 = 47.2"    2011-12 = 43.7"

Legit Blizzards (high winds and dbl digit snows): Feb 2011, Dec 2009, Jan 2005, Dec 2000, Jan 1999, Mar 1998, Nov 1989, Jan 1982, Jan 1978, Jan 1977, Apr 1975, Mar 1973, Jan 1967, Feb 1965, Jan 1918

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But GEFS at least trying for some of us up in the Lakes. I know it doesn't help you - sorry man.

 

attachicon.gif20160105 12z GEFS 120hr MSLP.gif

12z EPS keep shifting this storm farther off the East Coast and taking a more inland track from runs 2-3 days ago.  This is going to be complicated for the models to figure out what to do with the second piece of energy along the arctic front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like something wants to happen at this time frame, but it's just not quite there yet.

 

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like something wants to happen at this time frame, but it's just not quite there yet.

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2016010518/gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_ncus_17.png

What is interesting, the RPM/NAM at the end of the run have a swath of snow developing near the TX Panhandle.  I'd give it a couple more days to see how the models handle this second piece of energy.  Rule of Thumb suggests that the secondary piece is likely to be the stronger of the 2 and track up along the baraclinic zone/arctic front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But GEFS at least trying for some of us up in the Lakes. I know it doesn't help you - sorry man.

 

attachicon.gif20160105 12z GEFS 120hr MSLP.gif

18z GEFS continue to show more members cutting this second wave up near OH/IN...not off to the East

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs-ens/2016010518/gfs-ememb_lowlocs_us_19.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know its the 00z NAM, but taking a look at the 500mb vortex at the end of the run looks promising for lower lakes cutter.  Storm starts developing in N AR and the GOM starts opening up.  This storm has a real good chance of becoming a TX Pan Handle hooker (no, not the one on a six corner in Chicago...lol).

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/namconus/2016010600/namconus_z500_vort_us_29.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know its the 00z NAM, but taking a look at the 500mb vortex at the end of the run looks promising for lower lakes cutter. Storm starts developing in N AR and the GOM starts opening up. This storm has a real good chance of becoming a TX Pan Handle hooker (no, not the one on a six corner in Chicago...lol).

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/namconus/2016010600/namconus_z500_vort_us_29.png

Hahaha that gave me a good laugh.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I know its the 00z NAM, but taking a look at the 500mb vortex at the end of the run looks promising for lower lakes cutter. Storm starts developing in N AR and the GOM starts opening up. This storm has a real good chance of becoming a TX Pan Handle hooker (no, not the one on a six corner in Chicago...lol).

 

I'm not opposed to either ;) pretty sure Nebraska is going to need either/or given the way winter has went here so far.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha that gave me a good laugh.

I think Gary Lezak has been waiting for this one....prob part of the reason why he hasn't said much about the storm system just yet.  A lot of pieces are scattered around and the models are having difficulty but should be starting to get a better read soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00z NAM...

 

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/data/nam/00/nam_namer_081_500_vort_ht.gif

 

18z GFS...

 

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/data/gfs/18/gfs_namer_087_500_vort_ht.gif

 

 

Look at all those "X's" scattered all over the place...very odd looking...need them to be tied closer together...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take this!

 

Just get this to phase a bit more and end up with a wider snow band.

 

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take this!

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2016010600/gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_ncus_16.png

Just get this to phase a bit more and end up with a wider snow band.

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2016010600/gfs_asnow_ncus_19.png

 

That's another Geos special!  Racking up those 6"+ storms like they're nothing, would already be your 3rd of this still young season if it happened like this (or close to it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thread for the second wave that rides up the baroclinic zone.

 

Looks to be in the developing stages, but it is not all that far away in the future. Seems like something is bound to happen with this energy.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

108

 

Couple phased out bombs (some down to 985)

 

http://weather.gc.ca/data/ensemble/images/2016010600_054_E1_north@america_I_ENSEMBLE_pnm@gemglb@gem007_108.png

 

http://weather.gc.ca/data/ensemble/images/2016010600_054_E1_north@america_I_ENSEMBLE_pnm@gem008@gem016_108.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 UKMET HR 96

 

http://img.meteocentre.com/models/ukmet_amer_00/GZ_D5_PN_096_0000.gif

 

HR 120

 

http://img.meteocentre.com/models/ukmet_amer_00/GZ_D5_PN_120_0000.gif

 

The UKMET is always NW, the fact that it's SE of our ideal track isn't a great sign at this point.  Of course, still a few days for a NW shift to continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...