Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just now, Phil said:

The ECMWF projected 79°F today. Even it was too warm.

The GFS is forecasting 91°F again tomorrow, while the ECMWF is predicting 80°F. I wonder which will be closer. 🙄 

If you lived here it would be more obvious to you when there will be model issues.   The days when all the models will bust too warm is days with a solid marine layer that hangs on until at least noon and then slowly clears.   Its much easier for the models to handle all day clouds or all day sunshine.   Timing of clearing is everything on days like today.   Today was a guaranteed failure for the GFS.    

For tomorrow... the 12Z ECMWF showed 80 and the 00Z GFS shows 88.    The ECMWF handles marine layer clouds almost perfectly and it shows some low clouds into the Seattle area tomorrow morning and then clearing quickly.  Much quicker than today.   But still... onshore flow will be increasing during the day so I would lean slightly towards the ECMWF tomorrow.    Probably 82 or 83.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Cloud said:

For SEA? It's forecasting 84 tomorrow.... not 91? 

sfctmax_024h.us_state_wa.png

Close to 90°F at SeaTac, though.

9D8EB3BD-A575-4308-94FC-5DD410D29D1F.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly... on Saturday the models show a solid marine layer again through the morning and then clearing.   But there is not a warm air mass overhead that so the GFS will do much better.   The ECMWF shows 77 and the GFS shows 79 so they almost agree at this point so there really can't be a clear winner that day.

  • Like 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sfct.us_nw.png

  • Like 1
  • Sick 1

Location: Bethany, OR at about 250'

Snowfall:

     2021/2022: 6"

     2020/2021: 4.5"

     2019/2020: 1"

     2018/2019: 3.7"

     2017/2018: 5.5"

     2016/2017: 18"

     2015/2016: 1"

     2014/2015: 0"

     2013/2014: 9"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

If you lived here it would be more obvious to you when there will be model issues.   The days when all the models will bust too warm is days with a solid marine layer that hangs on until at least noon and then slowly clears.   Its much easier for the models to handle all day clouds or all day sunshine.   Timing of clearing is everything on days like today.   Today was a guaranteed failure for the GFS.    

For tomorrow... the 12Z ECMWF showed 80 and the 00Z GFS shows 88.    The ECMWF handles marine layer clouds almost perfectly and it shows some low clouds into the Seattle area tomorrow morning and then clearing quickly.  Much quicker than today.   But still... onshore flow will be increasing during the day so I would lean slightly towards the ECMWF tomorrow.    Probably 82 or 83.

Marine layer is advancing a bit later tonight compared to last, but it is making its away in and down from the Strait... Probably also means won't be as thick tomorrow and  faster to burn off. Could be a couple degrees warmer than today, which would be right on point with the Euro's forecast. 

CODNEXLAB-GOES-West-subregional-Pac_NW-07-04_36Z-20220902_map_-41-1n-10-100.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cloud said:

Marine layer is advancing a bit later tonight compared to last, but it is making its away in and down from the Strait... Probably also means won't be as thick tomorrow and  faster to burn off. Could be a couple degrees warmer than today, which would be right on point with the Euro's forecast. 

CODNEXLAB-GOES-West-subregional-Pac_NW-07-04_36Z-20220902_map_-41-1n-10-100.gif

Much slower... and also moving more north to south than to the east.     But will probably form in place around Seattle later.  

Here is the ECMWF cloud map for 8 a.m. and 11 a.m. tomorrow:

 

 

ecmwf-deterministic-washington-total_cloud-2130800.png

ecmwf-deterministic-washington-total_cloud-2141600.png

  • Like 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS will always be right when it shows an Arctic & snow event down to southern Oregon.

  • Like 1

Springfield, Oregon cold season 21-22 Stats:

  • Coldest high: 35F (Dec 27, 2021)
  • Coldest low: 17F (Feb 23, 2022)
  • Days with below freezing temps: 36 (Most recent: Apr 17, 2022)
  • Days with sub-40F highs: 5 (Most recent: Jan 17, 2022)
  • Total snowfall: 10.0"
  • Last accumulating snowfall: December 28, 2021
  • Last sub-freezing high: Jan 14, 2017 (31F) *Longest streak without a sub-freezing high on record*
  • Last White Christmas: 1990
  • Significant wind events (gusts 45+): 0

Personal Stats:

  • Last accumulating snowfall: December 28, 2021
  • Last sub-freezing high: Jan 14, 2017 (31)
  • Last White Christmas: 2008
  • Total snowfall since joining TheWeatherForums: 30.7"

 

Venmo

GoFundMe "College Basketball vs Epilepsy": gf.me/u/zk3pj2

My Twitter @363jerseys4hope

24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In all seriousness though, I feel like the best approach to improving the GFS is to privatize or become independent like the Euro and take it out of the government's hand. But this would also means  funding issue. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cloud said:

In all seriousness though, I feel like the best approach to improving the GFS is to privatize or become independent like the Euro and take it out of the government's hand. But this would also means  funding issue. 

I'm surprised Amazon, google etc haven't started their own paid weather model services yet. All the oligarchs at the tippy top could argue over whose model scores better.

  • Excited 1

Springfield, Oregon cold season 21-22 Stats:

  • Coldest high: 35F (Dec 27, 2021)
  • Coldest low: 17F (Feb 23, 2022)
  • Days with below freezing temps: 36 (Most recent: Apr 17, 2022)
  • Days with sub-40F highs: 5 (Most recent: Jan 17, 2022)
  • Total snowfall: 10.0"
  • Last accumulating snowfall: December 28, 2021
  • Last sub-freezing high: Jan 14, 2017 (31F) *Longest streak without a sub-freezing high on record*
  • Last White Christmas: 1990
  • Significant wind events (gusts 45+): 0

Personal Stats:

  • Last accumulating snowfall: December 28, 2021
  • Last sub-freezing high: Jan 14, 2017 (31)
  • Last White Christmas: 2008
  • Total snowfall since joining TheWeatherForums: 30.7"

 

Venmo

GoFundMe "College Basketball vs Epilepsy": gf.me/u/zk3pj2

My Twitter @363jerseys4hope

24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, FroYoBro said:

Any thoughts on this Dewey?

Hopefully nature is trying to pay us back for stealing spring this year.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00Z GEFS actually trended a little more troughy next weekend... so definitely not in agreement with the operational run.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Phil said:

Close to 90°F at SeaTac, though.

9D8EB3BD-A575-4308-94FC-5DD410D29D1F.png

I was talking about today anyway.  Last night's GFS was going 91 for SEA today (Thursday), and the high was 77.  What  a joke.  I can literally tell when it's way high just based on the 500mb level.

  • Like 1

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2022-23 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 0.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 0

Total Hail = 0.0

Coldest Low = 42

Lows 32 or below = 0

Highs 32 or below = 0

Lows 20 or below = 0

Highs 40 or below = 0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TigerWoodsLibido said:

I'm surprised Amazon, google etc haven't started their own paid weather model services yet. All the oligarchs at the tippy top could argue over whose model scores better.

No way I would pay for weather on a site like that.

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2022-23 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 0.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 0

Total Hail = 0.0

Coldest Low = 42

Lows 32 or below = 0

Highs 32 or below = 0

Lows 20 or below = 0

Highs 40 or below = 0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, snow_wizard said:

I was talking about today anyway.  Last night's GFS was going 91 for SEA today (Thursday), and the high was 77.  What  a joke.  I can literally tell when it's way high just based on the 500mb level.

The high was actually 78... but whatever. 

The issue is marine layer clearing.   You can tell when the GFS will have issues when the ECMWF shows a solid marine layer and the GFS does not.    

Will you be this vocal about the GFS shortcomings when its always too cold with temps this winter.   Probably not.   But it has issues on both ends... its generally too extreme.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cloud said:

In all seriousness though, I feel like the best approach to improving the GFS is to privatize or become independent like the Euro and take it out of the government's hand. But this would also means  funding issue. 

I have often wondered why we are actually more "socialized" with our weather models than Europe is.  With everything else it's the other way around.  In this case I think the government doing it might be better.  A lot more of the data is free that way.

That having been said I think the current version of the GFS is a turd sandwich.  They should have never released it.  The previous version seemed better to me.

  • Like 2

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2022-23 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 0.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 0

Total Hail = 0.0

Coldest Low = 42

Lows 32 or below = 0

Highs 32 or below = 0

Lows 20 or below = 0

Highs 40 or below = 0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TT-SEA said:

The high was actually 78... but whatever. 

The issue is marine layer clearing.   You can tell when the GFS will have issues when the ECMWF shows a solid marine layer and the GFS does not.    

Will you be this vocal about the GFS shortcomings when its always too cold with temps this winter.   Probably not.   But it has issues on both ends... its generally too extreme.  

This version isn't cold biased very often.  I remember in the old MRF days the models were always cold biased.  Now they have gone too far the other way.

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2022-23 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 0.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 0

Total Hail = 0.0

Coldest Low = 42

Lows 32 or below = 0

Highs 32 or below = 0

Lows 20 or below = 0

Highs 40 or below = 0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, snow_wizard said:

This version isn't cold biased very often.  I remember in the old MRF days the models were always cold biased.  Now they have gone too far the other way.

It can be comically bad in the cold direction as well.    That even happened a few days in this warm summer for highs and lows.  And it certainly happens in the cold season.   

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

The high was actually 78... but whatever. 

The issue is marine layer clearing.   You can tell when the GFS will have issues when the ECMWF shows a solid marine layer and the GFS does not.    

Will you be this vocal about the GFS shortcomings when its always too cold with temps this winter.   Probably not.   But it has issues on both ends... its generally too extreme.  

I wonder if this will get adjusted tomorrow. The 5pm update was 77 and the 11pm update was 79 on its 6-h max obs. 

The 79 happened around 6PM. 

Then what's being recorded in the daily climate report is a maximum of 78. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cloud said:

I wonder if this will get adjusted tomorrow. The 5pm update was 77 and the 11pm update was 79 on its 6-h max obs. 

The 79 happened around 6PM. 

Then what's being recorded in the daily climate report is a maximum of 78. 

Yep... picked up another degree.   The high at SEA was 79.   It will be updated in the morning.  

  • Like 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Cloud said:

I wonder if this will get adjusted tomorrow. The 5pm update was 77 and the 11pm update was 79 on its 6-h max obs. 

The 79 happened around 6PM. 

Then what's being recorded in the daily climate report is a maximum of 78. 

That 79 seems suspicious.  No 78 shown in any obs around that time.  Basically 77, 77, 77, 79, 79 ,79, 77, 77, 77

  • Weenie 1

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2022-23 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 0.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 0

Total Hail = 0.0

Coldest Low = 42

Lows 32 or below = 0

Highs 32 or below = 0

Lows 20 or below = 0

Highs 40 or below = 0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TigerWoodsLibido said:

I'm surprised Amazon, google etc haven't started their own paid weather model services yet. All the oligarchs at the tippy top could argue over whose model scores better.

Shhh.... Daddy Bezos will be all over it once he's done with his robot vacuum army.

  • Excited 1
  • lol 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, snow_wizard said:

I have often wondered why we are actually more "socialized" with our weather models than Europe is.  With everything else it's the other way around.  In this case I think the government doing it might be better.  A lot more of the data is free that way.

That having been said I think the current version of the GFS is a turd sandwich.  They should have never released it.  The previous version seemed better to me.

I would say that this is the one upside to having it being ran by the government... the NWS across the country on social media is quite active and this actually allows for people to be quite engaged. Which is a very good thing. But at the same time, we have to be careful with the free data given to us as well, I've seen it getting blown out of proportion, especially during the winter time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, snow_wizard said:

That 79 seems suspicious.  No 78 shown in any obs around that time.  Basically 77, 77, 77, 79, 79 ,79, 77, 77, 77

You mean the 78 seems suspicious?    The inter-hourly observations are not reliable as been discussed many times.   But they do capture the actual high and low temp every 6 hours.   I am almost certain it will show 79 tomorrow because of the 11 p.m. update with the high temp since 5 p.m. being 79.

  • Like 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, snow_wizard said:

That 79 seems suspicious.  No 78 shown in any obs around that time.  Basically 77, 77, 77, 79, 79 ,79, 77, 77, 77

Celsius rounding.

  • Like 2

Weather stats for MBY

Snowfall:

-Total snowfall since joining: 45.25"

-2018-19: 21"

-2019-20: 2.5"

-2020-21: 13"

-2021-22: 8.75"

-Most recent snowfall: 0.25”; February 24th, 2022

-Largest snowfall (single storm): 8.5"; February 12-13, 2021

-Largest snow depth: 14"; 1:30am February 12th, 2019

Temperatures:

-Warmest: 109F; June 28th, 2021

-Coldest: 13F; December 27th, 2021

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, snow_wizard said:

That 79 seems suspicious.  No 78 shown in any obs around that time.  Basically 77, 77, 77, 79, 79 ,79, 77, 77, 77

We all know the red number being shown here on the 6-h obs is what matters.. so as suspicious as it may seems, it's official. 

Also, the daily climate report that was updated at 6:19 showed a maximum of 78. That definitely got rounded up. 

Untitled.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ECMWF insists that little trough on Tuesday night and Wednesday is almost devoid of low clouds even on the coast.   Looks sunny both Tuesday and Wednesday.    

Here is Wednesday afternoon...

ecmwf-deterministic-or_wa-clouds_fourpanel-2584400.png

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, snow_wizard said:

This version isn't cold biased very often.  I remember in the old MRF days the models were always cold biased.  Now they have gone too far the other way.

I think the version in January 2020 was an older version (I think they upgraded in 2021?) but I'm not sure what was with the GFS during that month lol unknown.png

Location: Bethany, OR at about 250'

Snowfall:

     2021/2022: 6"

     2020/2021: 4.5"

     2019/2020: 1"

     2018/2019: 3.7"

     2017/2018: 5.5"

     2016/2017: 18"

     2015/2016: 1"

     2014/2015: 0"

     2013/2014: 9"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doiinko said:

I think the version in January 2020 was an older version (I think they upgraded in 2021?) but I'm not sure what was with the GFS during that month lol unknown.png

 

Actual high at PDX on 1/15/20 was 42.    Just 32 degrees too cold there.   😀

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

 

Actual high at PDX on 1/15/20 was 42.    Just 32 degrees too cold there.   😀

It was just showing your average Arctic blast with 8 days with lows in the single digits...

Location: Bethany, OR at about 250'

Snowfall:

     2021/2022: 6"

     2020/2021: 4.5"

     2019/2020: 1"

     2018/2019: 3.7"

     2017/2018: 5.5"

     2016/2017: 18"

     2015/2016: 1"

     2014/2015: 0"

     2013/2014: 9"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Longtimer
4 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

 

Actual high at PDX on 1/15/20 was 42.    Just 32 degrees too cold there.   😀

In Jim’s defense, that is a little different. What happened today is a very short term anomaly due to a complete misunderstanding of low level conditions. January 2020 was a protracted shift warmer on a macro level, although anyone with brain one would know the 10 degree max temps were probably also off by at least 10 degrees.

  • Like 2

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deweydog said:

In Jim’s defense, that is a little different. What happened today is a very short term anomaly due to a complete misunderstanding of low level conditions. January 2020 was a protracted shift warmer on a macro level, although anyone with brain one would know the 10 degree max temps were probably also off by at least 10 degrees.

Yeah I didn't mean to argue with his point I just wanted to point out the extreme temps it was showing lol

Location: Bethany, OR at about 250'

Snowfall:

     2021/2022: 6"

     2020/2021: 4.5"

     2019/2020: 1"

     2018/2019: 3.7"

     2017/2018: 5.5"

     2016/2017: 18"

     2015/2016: 1"

     2014/2015: 0"

     2013/2014: 9"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Longtimer
2 minutes ago, Doiinko said:

Yeah I didn't mean to argue with his point I just wanted to point out the extreme temps it was showing lol

They were pretty ridiculous. I believe it also pretty consistently showed temps in the mid teens for the February 2021 event.

  • Like 1

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deweydog said:

In Jim’s defense, that is a little different. What happened today is a very short term anomaly due to a complete misunderstanding of low level conditions. January 2020 was a protracted shift warmer on a macro level, although anyone with brain one would know the 10 degree max temps were probably also off by at least 10 degrees.

Yeah... all the models shifted way warmer in the lead up to that event.    Randy still did good though.   And that is all that really matters!  

  • Excited 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course... a week ago the ECMWF was showing a massive rain event beginning tomorrow morning for a large part of western WA and SW BC.    

  • Sad 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solid improvement on the EPS with PNA going decently negative.

1662076800-Ye3BcVWxm2sgrb2.png

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1
  • Sick 1

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2022-23 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 0.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 0

Total Hail = 0.0

Coldest Low = 42

Lows 32 or below = 0

Highs 32 or below = 0

Lows 20 or below = 0

Highs 40 or below = 0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snow_wizard said:

Solid improvement on the EPS with PNA going decently negative.

1662076800-Ye3BcVWxm2sgrb2.png

Would rather this happen from late Nov-Feb.

  • Downvote 1

Springfield, Oregon cold season 21-22 Stats:

  • Coldest high: 35F (Dec 27, 2021)
  • Coldest low: 17F (Feb 23, 2022)
  • Days with below freezing temps: 36 (Most recent: Apr 17, 2022)
  • Days with sub-40F highs: 5 (Most recent: Jan 17, 2022)
  • Total snowfall: 10.0"
  • Last accumulating snowfall: December 28, 2021
  • Last sub-freezing high: Jan 14, 2017 (31F) *Longest streak without a sub-freezing high on record*
  • Last White Christmas: 1990
  • Significant wind events (gusts 45+): 0

Personal Stats:

  • Last accumulating snowfall: December 28, 2021
  • Last sub-freezing high: Jan 14, 2017 (31)
  • Last White Christmas: 2008
  • Total snowfall since joining TheWeatherForums: 30.7"

 

Venmo

GoFundMe "College Basketball vs Epilepsy": gf.me/u/zk3pj2

My Twitter @363jerseys4hope

24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Longtimer

Seems like a mild night AC hasn’t clicked off once. 

  • Like 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 82.13" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still 57F here so a bit warmer than last night.

Springfield, Oregon cold season 21-22 Stats:

  • Coldest high: 35F (Dec 27, 2021)
  • Coldest low: 17F (Feb 23, 2022)
  • Days with below freezing temps: 36 (Most recent: Apr 17, 2022)
  • Days with sub-40F highs: 5 (Most recent: Jan 17, 2022)
  • Total snowfall: 10.0"
  • Last accumulating snowfall: December 28, 2021
  • Last sub-freezing high: Jan 14, 2017 (31F) *Longest streak without a sub-freezing high on record*
  • Last White Christmas: 1990
  • Significant wind events (gusts 45+): 0

Personal Stats:

  • Last accumulating snowfall: December 28, 2021
  • Last sub-freezing high: Jan 14, 2017 (31)
  • Last White Christmas: 2008
  • Total snowfall since joining TheWeatherForums: 30.7"

 

Venmo

GoFundMe "College Basketball vs Epilepsy": gf.me/u/zk3pj2

My Twitter @363jerseys4hope

24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Phil unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...