Jump to content

March 2014 Observations and Discussions


Tom

Recommended Posts

12+ for Chicago by HR 189.

 

Big thing is we need to get that system to phase and lift farther north. The one for the Feb 28th timeframe. If we can get that and delay the high coming in a bit it could allow the next system to follow the same type of path.

 

18z GFS shows just that. We'll see if the 0z can continue the trend or if its just a blip in the 18z run.

I will not get excited as this is the mid range GFS and only one run but if other models follow suit then it will be something to watch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 Tony, it is the GFS, however, Euro was also showing showing signs of the potential this system can become. 

 

Here is the full run thru 204 HR...

^You are right, I forgot about the Euro looking fairly decent as well so hope this is a trend in the right direction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the snow cover builds back up in early March to widespread 12"+ snow depths in IA/N MO/IL etc...there will be more subzero cold in March if the pattern continues.  In fact, I find it rather interesting that some of the record lows this week that are in jeopardy are over 100+ years old dating back into the late 1880's!  The latest subzero record low temp for Chicago was March 22nd 1888 -1F.  Can you see the pattern???  If we can break records over 100+ years old this week, I don't see why we can't set new all time records for snow and cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is the storm that hits Cali late this week.  Huge storm that will dump FEET of snow in the mountains.  I have a good feeling this storm is going to over perform from its previous cycle in the LRC and produce much more widespread significant snowfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its really amazing how only a couple model runs ago nothing substantial was in the works then all of a sudden.....BOOM. Just goes to show you have to have patience as the weather will turn in a hurry. But saying this, the models can also take it away as they have done in the past numerous times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patience builds character, which builds into making wiser decisions...I agree with you Tony, we shouldn't jump the gun just yet...but having the knowledge to make an educated forecast is better than watching 1 model run and saying that will be what happens.  I've been paying attention to this storm for about 2 weeks now and said that March will roar in like a Lion.  It's fascinating to see the evolution of the LRC in the model runs today.  Nonetheless, it will be an exciting week to see how this system evolves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just looked at the Euro weeklies and its confirming the cold to continue for the next 3 weeks.  It's also showing a lower lakes cutter 3/8-3/9 period, which BTW, is the same period I said our next storm system would start to appear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

everyone here keeps talking about a "storm". the GFS is showing several waves or systems. So which one is the "storm"? lol

I believe the storm with the most potential is next Monday and like next Tuesday. Looks like two separate waves, though. Really tricky to figure out, something I'll have to read an AFD on to get a better understanding of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just said you looked at the GFS which shows what you think is going to happen, yet you don't look at the "temperatures" it shows it being colder than normal all the way through its run with colder air rushing in again on the 9th-11th then finally reaching about 30 by the end of its run. 

 

GFS is cold biased - last week during the WAA proved that. Actually every model busted on that.

Those low 30s would translate to low 40s given it being March, especially if it was sunny.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm done with winter till next season...

 

Something I've been looking for to be mentioned in the AFD's was brought up by LOT today. The under cutting of the Alaska Ridge.

 

 

FRIDAY AND BEYOND...THERE IS DECENT AGREEMENT AMONG MEDIUM RANGE
GUIDANCE IN ENERGY UNDERCUTTING THE ALASKA RIDGE LEADING TO A LOWER
AMPLITUDE MORE ZONAL FLOW ACROSS MUCH OF THE CONUS. AS THIS OCCURS
THERE MAY BE SOME PHASING OF EXISTING NORTHERN STREAM ENERGY WITH
ENERGY FROM THE DEVELOPING SOUTHERN STREAM. THE DEGREE WITH WHICH
THIS OCCURS IS UP IN THE AIR BUT DO HAVE REASONABLE CONFIDENCE IN
ANOTHER TROUGH COMING DOWN THE NORTHERN STREAM. HOWEVER...THE
SOUTHERN STREAM CONNECTION MAY BE KEY IN GETTING ENOUGH MOISTURE
INTO THE AREA TO PRODUCE PRECIP LATER FRIDAY OR EARLY SATURDAY.
SHOULD PHASING OCCUR THEN IT IS POSSIBLE WE COULD SEE ANOTHER HYBRID
PACIFIC/CLIPPER TYPE SYSTEM WHICH WE HAVE SEEN A FEW TIMES THIS
WINTER. MANY VARIABLES NEED TO PLAY OUT FIRST BUT A SHIFT TO THE
MORE ZONAL PATTERN IS REASONABLE SUPPORTING SOME MODERATING OF TEMPS
BUT ALSO POTENTIALLY LEAD TO A MORE ACTIVE PERIOD INTO EARLY NEXT
WEEK.

MDB

 

 

If that happens, then the unseasonably cold air air supply will be cut off. The EPO would actually probably remain somewhat negative, but it would be a pseudo -EPO as it wouldn't have the same effect as it has. 

Basically this would be an inverse of a cut off low. Same principal with the main jet stream by-passing the high to the south.

 

EDIT: It would still be cold, but more seasonable cold for awhile due to expansive snow cover that would likely hang around a bit longer. Maybe something like March of 2008.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm done with winter till next season...

 

Something I've been looking for to be mentioned in the AFD's was brought up by LOT today. The under cutting of the Alaska Ridge.

 

 

 

If that happens, then the unseasonably cold air air supply will be cut off. The EPO would actually probably remain somewhat negative, but it would be a pseudo -EPO as it wouldn't have the same effect as it has. 

Basically this would be an inverse of a cut off low. Same principal with the main stream by-passing the high to the south.

And for those who may not like this Geos, or my attitude towards the warmer weather, give us a break, this has been a brutal, brutal winter as far as cold goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for those who may not like this Geos, or my attitude towards the warmer weather, give us a break, this has been a brutal, brutal winter as far as cold goes.

 

We still have our record breaking winter in the books. And will still see some snow, but will get a break on our heating bills finally. lol

It should be an interesting thing to monitor in the next 10 days, besides the early week snow threat next week.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm rooting for a big west/east swath of significant snowfall from the Plains to the Great Lakes.  The 500mb pattern would support this idea as the Pacific storm train hits California for a time before the west coast ridge amplifies once again.  First 10 days of March would be the most likely timeframe to see the biggest snow storms to hit the region before the NW Flow kicks in around week 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess LOT has been watching this trend for several run cycles now, so will see what this brings after the first 7 days of the month. ...Maybe that's what DVN was trying to get at 2 weeks ago.

(You can see the jet stream breaking through on the 500hPA geopotential height maps off the GFS starting around March 6th).

 

I'm still rooting for one last hooray snow wise though actually. Enough to hit the average March snowfall, which is about 7" I believe.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyways...

 

First thing is first, an real early week snowstorm threat. That high to the north will have to back off in order to give the low room to go negative tilt. FYI: I'd give it till another day to 36 hours before starting a thread, just in case it ends up being a weak frontal wave.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyways...

 

First thing is first, an real early week snowstorm threat. That high to the north will have to back off in order to give the low room to go negative tilt. FYI: I'd give it till another day to 36 hours before starting a thread, just in case it ends up being a weak frontal wave.

 

Even if it  does intial WAA could give us several inches across large chunk of Plains and into parts of Lakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if it  does intial WAA could give us several inches across large chunk of Plains and into parts of Lakes.

 

I was just reading that a flat wave is better. Otherwise a strong system could muscle its way too far NW.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. GFS up and running. Just hoping to see a continued look as the 18z gfs. 

Yeah, even if the storm doesn't come too much further north, would just like to see the same or a little weaker high pressure. I like our chances as long as that high pressure isn't too strong, or otherwise I've seen that win out way too many times this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what site are you guys using that is already out that far? the site I use(mag.ncep.noaa.gov) is behind that

I don't like using it because it can be hard to look at sometimes and not always show accurate amounts, but Instant Weather Maps updates faster than all other sites I've used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...