Jump to content

June 2017 Observations and Model Discussion for the Pacific Northwest


Recommended Posts

I don't see anyone "model riding". Models swing back and forth all the time, and I think most here recognize this.

 

Some models struggle with patterns like this, but these problems eventually work themselves out. In this case, the ECMWF/EPS suite is probably best suited to handle the retrogression going forward. And again, I think most here recognize this.

There has been more commentary on model runs than any June I've been here. Surpassing last year, which was also a new record. Kinda like global temps LOL.

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been more commentary on model runs than any June I've been here. Surpassing last year, which was also a new record. Kinda like global temps LOL.

Yeah, what is this, a weather forum or something?

 

FWIW, I'm pretty sure last year had more. At least as far as my contributions are concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[model post] The 18z GFS is pulling an old-school Euro with that ridiculous offshore trough exchange [/model post]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seemed to disappear for a few weeks after some embarrassingly fumbled calls near the end of May. It's all good. Sometimes we all need to take some time off to reflect.

 

It's looking more likely that June ends a little below normal, fwiw.

 

I was busy/traveling, but thanks for missing me buddy!  :wub:

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to be defensive. I didn't even call out anyone by name, or say it was a bad thing.

How was that defensive? Lighten up, brother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been the one laughing.

 

:lol:

 

See?

I'm lost as to what it is you're even arguing. It feels like you're trying to make a subtle point about something but I can't pick out what that something might be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kudos appear to be in order!

Dude deserves a medal. Possibly a Nobel prize for outstanding long range weather forecasting. Or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

I'm not hunting kudos. Jesse claimed I've been blowing calls left and right, I was just putting the facts out there in response.

I was kidding around. I haven't once attacked your forecast or claimed you're blowing calls. I actually thought your May forecast was solid, at least until you went all-in at the buzzer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Classic ridge location on the d11-16 18z GEFS mean.

 

The bias corrected GEFS will be out shortly.

 

http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww243/phillywillie/Mobile%20Uploads/BFA575AD-32DC-481C-9A6C-22E78ECBDEE5_zpsrhcc77wo.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the bias-corrected GEFS mean. Definitely more bullish on the retrogression and downstream trough, which usually suggests the regular GFS/GEFS will be trending that way too.

 

http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww243/phillywillie/Mobile%20Uploads/CABC491D-8B05-4795-9EDB-F1DF15F89DA2_zpsjf3ebjly.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the bias-corrected GEFS mean. Definitely more bullish on the retrogression and downstream trough, which usually suggests the regular GFS/GEFS will be trending that way too.

 

http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww243/phillywillie/Mobile%20Uploads/CABC491D-8B05-4795-9EDB-F1DF15F89DA2_zpsjf3ebjly.gif

Note the tilted ridge axis and the surrounding horseshoe of low geopotential heights. That's a clear signal for a continuous retrogression as we leave June and enter July, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are you going? I figured traveling above the fray and back every day was already a pretty tolling commute.

Hopefully you have a good miles card. You have quite a few selfs to find. Bring a neck pillow and noise cancelling ear phones.

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Classic ridge location on the d11-16 18z GEFS mean.

 

The bias corrected GEFS will be out shortly.

 

http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww243/phillywillie/Mobile%20Uploads/BFA575AD-32DC-481C-9A6C-22E78ECBDEE5_zpsrhcc77wo.gif

In your opinion, how does the progression of things look for us going into the Fourth of July?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In your opinion, how does the progression of things look for us going into the Fourth of July this year?

I'm thinking Aleutian/EPO block, with a dryish meridional western trough that will be in the process of splitting, instead of the zonal flow we've seen recently.

 

I could be wrong about the exact configuration, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LGA hit 101*F today. Amazing considering they're right on the water and it's only June. If confirmed, it ties the early season 100+ record, which was set back in 1952.

 

101 indeed. The earliest 100 was actually on 6/10/2008 (teleconnection to our massive trough on that day), while the previous earliest 101 was on 6/26/1952. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should be noted, however, that LGA has been running conspicuously warmer than either Central Park or JFK. 

 

LGA reported 97 on May 18th, an early season record. Central Park was 92 and JFK was 85. 

 

And yesterday, while LGA hit 101, Central Park and JFK were both 94. 

 

This could be just the local wind patterns, as LGA is positioned differently in relation to water bodies than either Central Park or JFK. Or possibly there's a sensor issue. I don't know enough about the inter-NYC temp tendencies to say anything more. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to help remind you. It can be easy to want to forget about major busts like that. At the time you seemed pretty sure about it.

 

Calling for a warmer than average May around the time the models started trending warmer for the second half of the month was impressive, though. You can most certainly keep that one. Getting ahead of yourself and going for a top 10 warm month was also pretty understandable given the context. All the winning started going to your head.

Dude let your gripe go. You complain about Tim's constant posts about the same topic then do the same. We get it, FR is a d-bag.
  • Like 1

Bend, OR

Elevation: 3550'

 

Snow History:

Nov: 1"

Dec: .5"

Jan: 1.9"

Feb: 12.7"

Mar: 1.0"

Total: 17.1"

 

2016/2017: 70"

2015/2016: 34"

Average: ~25"

 

2017/2018 Winter Temps

Lowest Min: 1F on 2/23

Lowest Max: 23F on 12/24, 2/22

Lows <32: 87

Highs <32: 13

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00z GFS is back on track through 168hrs.

 

Looks fairly pleasant next week verbatim on the 00Z GFS... temps at or just slightly above normal and dry with NW flow.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks fairly pleasant next week verbatim on the 00Z GFS... temps at or just slightly above normal and dry with NW flow.

Looks that way. Keep in mind that after midweek, it's probably too beefy with the residual SW US anticyclone and too far offshore with the shortwave. Could still be nice though. I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pattern in general should be moving away from the extended jet stuff for awhile. So maybe that'd allow for more offshore flow at times.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pattern in general should be moving away from the extended jet stuff for awhile. So maybe that'd allow for more offshore flow at times.

 

We don't get offshore flow during the summer very often... and when we do its usually really hot.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't get offshore flow during the summer very often... and when we do its usually really hot.  

 

There are different degrees of offshore flow. You don't need east winds at the surface for it to count, like you might see during some of our very hottest days. Light offshore flow or even dead (ish) gradients are pretty common in the summer, and can give us moderately warm to very warm days without much trouble. Especially once we get into July and August.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SeaTac hit 65*F today, so the 70*F forecast from the GFS MOS was actually worse than the 61*F from the 00z ECMWF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SeaTac hit 65*F today, so the 70*F forecast from the GFS MOS was actually worse than the 61*F from the 00z ECMWF.

 

Yep... ECMWF bias still stands though.   3-5 degrees too cool most of the time.    GFS did not pick up on the extent of the cloud cover this afternoon.   I don't think the GFS MOS has a bias... its just wrong on some occasions because it misses some key factor.   Its wrong in both directions equally from what I can tell.  

 

The ECMWF showed that it would not get above 62 at SEA until Saturday afternoon and its been 65 both days since.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...