Jump to content

PNW January 2023 Observations and Discussion


Requiem

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

Not hard to imagine the pattern shown on the 12Z ECMWF at day 10 crashing hard immediately afterwards.

Definitely could…don’t want to get hung up on the details of one good run. Ensembles have been decent for the most part for the last few days though. Hopefully this pattern can deliver in a big way and not 500-1000ft snow levels. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TacomaWx said:

Looking at it from an 850MB temp map there’s definitely some cold to work with up north with energy trying to push south. Starting to get interesting now that this is showing up on operational models within day 10…long way to go still. 

Look who’s all conservative now that he’s got a job riding on it!! Jkjk

  • lol 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ended up with a 42/32 day yesterday. Socked in with fog and low clouds most of the day but it cleared out enough in the evening to score a freeze before midnight.

Low of 31 here today just after midnight. Low clouds and fog reformed late and it’s currently 37 and mostly cloudy. Very nice to have the wintertime chill back.

  • Like 1

Summer ☀️ grows while Winter ❄️  goes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TacomaWx said:

LMAO It’s going to be hard to contain my weenieism on my forecasts. I’m gonna try to play things conservative and within climo for the most part. 

It gets very different when you share forecasts with others. Being a weenie and geeking about what might happen is very different from advising others what is likely to happen. One has to put one’s own personal desires aside.

A rule of thumb that almost never fails me is that if it gets within 24 hours and both the Euro and the GFS are calling for it, it is probably going to happen. Sometimes (not often) the official forecasts are at variance with that rule, and those are the times I share my forecast with friends (and this has given me a reputation of being some sort of weather genius, even though I am just applying a fairly simple rule).

  • Like 1
It's called clown range for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rubus Leucodermis said:

It gets very different when you share forecasts with others. Being a weenie and geeking about what might happen is very different from advising others what is likely to happen. One has to put one’s own personal desires aside.

A rule of thumb that almost never fails me is that if it gets within 24 hours and both the Euro and the GFS are calling for it, it is probably going to happen. Sometimes the official forecasts are at variance with that rule, and those are the times I share my forecast with friends (and this has given me a reputation of being some sort of weather genius, even though I am just applying a fairly simple rule).

My boss said to give him just one forecast update a week….but I told him that would likely be unreliable and it would need to be twice a week. Models are obviously unreliable past 72-96 hours. I don’t want to say with certainty any forecast past 72 hours.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kayla said:

Day 10+ aside, the control run should never really be used for snowfall amounts (kind of wished they excluded that parameter). It has a resolution of 18km so most of what you are seeing is terrain bleed. It’s really just another member of 51 other members that is run four times everyday.
 

At this range, it’s much more wise to hang your snow hopes on what the ensemble means are showing.

If you looked at the 500mb heights of the run, you would know it was not terrain bleed.

  • Downvote 2
  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TacomaWx said:

My boss said to give him just one forecast update a week….but I told him that would likely be unreliable and it would need to be twice a week. Models are obviously unreliable past 72-96 hours. I don’t want to say with certainty any forecast past 72 hours.  

If you are able to nail down a snow forecast around these parts at 72hrs, you should probably be forecasting professionally. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TacomaWx said:

My boss said to give him just one forecast update a week….but I told him that would likely be unreliable and it would need to be twice a week. Models are obviously unreliable past 72-96 hours. I don’t want to say with certainty any forecast past 72 hours.  

Yeah, that's one of my benchmarks. If it's not within 72 hours, I regard it as very clown-rangy and if I do share any model insights with friends, I make sure to phrase things very tentatively.

  • Like 1
It's called clown range for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Slushy Inch said:

If you looked at the 500mb heights of the run, you would know it was not terrain bleed.

15 day ensemble snow maps really aren’t any more valuable than the operational or control runs.  The 500mb pattern in the long range ensembles is really all that matters. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ShawniganLake said:

If you are able to nail down a snow forecast around these parts at 72hrs, you should probably be forecasting professionally. 

With snow I wouldn’t say anything with certainty past 24-36 hours. I’d just say maybe past 24 hours. My boss isn’t concerned with snowfall as much mostly rainfall totals and freeze potential…which is a bit easier and even with that I wouldn’t want to give a forecast more than 72 hours on rainfall totals. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a blast on the GEM. Pretty backdoor. 

  • Like 2
  • Sick 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Slushy Inch said:

Yuck 1675339200-Noi9azggjaM.png.

One F higher. It’s over 

  • Sad 1
  • Weenie 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LowerGarfield said:

Salmon /crab fishing? I know several different people in WA that do it every year as a tradition. They go to Alaska and work at a cannery or a seafood boat and make more money in two months than they do the rest of the year.

Ha not quite! It would be for some helicopter work up there.

  • Like 5

Cold Season 2023/24:

Total snowfall: 26"

Highest daily snowfall: 5"

Deepest snow depth: 12"

Coldest daily high: -20ºF

Coldest daily low: -42ºF

Number of subzero days: 5

Personal Weather Station on Wunderground: 

https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KMTBOZEM152#history

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Slushy Inch said:

Little bit too far west. Issue is that troughing gets sucked southeast like on control.1675274400-zFGeILVhzl4.png1675252800-27uSkvw2ieI.png

Control run is a disappointing mess.    The control run giveth and taketh away.    From 50 inches of snow to basically nothing.   Good news is that the 00Z run will probably show 6 feet of snow in Seattle based on the assumption that there is no gap between the Olympics and the Cascades and Seattle is at 5,000 feet in elevation!  

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RentonHill said:

113920B4-B03D-4D6D-8F40-E2D964562A65.gif

I’ve seen worse. 

  • Like 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

Control run is a disappointing mess.    The control run giveth and taketh away.    From 50 inches of snow to basically nothing.   Good news is that the 00Z run will probably show 6 feet of snow in Seattle based on the assumption that there is no gap between the Olympics and the Cascades and Seattle is at 5,000 feet in elevation!  

The good news is, looking at the control run ever is a waste of time!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Timmy said:

The good news is, looking at the control run ever is a waste of time!

Good for the general pattern at the 500mb level compared to the ECMWF through day 10.   Pretty meaningless for snow totals and surface temps though.   

When there is a model battle going on it can be used to support or contradict the ECMWF run through day 10 and that can be somewhat valuable if its totally different than the ECMWF.

  • Like 5

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, TacomaWx said:

My boss said to give him just one forecast update a week….but I told him that would likely be unreliable and it would need to be twice a week. Models are obviously unreliable past 72-96 hours. I don’t want to say with certainty any forecast past 72 hours.  

Not sure how well off you are listening to advice from someone here who seems overly confident in their abilities despite never putting out a forecast that I can remember. I think you’ll do just fine based on what I’ve seen from your model analysis/etc.

Really cool that your boss has given you this unofficial duty!

  • Thanks 1
  • Spam 1

Summer ☀️ grows while Winter ❄️  goes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more point for @TacomaWx: perhaps the biggest defect of professional and official forecasts is that they contain no estimate of forecast confidence. A forecast based on models that are all trending one way reads just like one when the models disagree with each other and flip-flop from run to run. Including something about one's confidence in a forecast is an easy way to improve on official forecasts.

  • Like 9
It's called clown range for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Cascadia_Wx said:

The chance of low snow levels tomorrow looks interesting.

My guess is that it ends up mostly being snow at 500 feet and above, but if stronger showers develop they could drag the snow level down and yield a surprise or two.

  • Like 3
It's called clown range for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...