Jump to content

3/11 - 3/12 Winter Storm


Tom

Recommended Posts

Skilling showed his updated RPM model that kicked out a band of 7-8" of snow right across N IL. IMO, I think N IL will be under a WSW tonight. High rez models are picking up better with this type of situation.

I'd say they'd play it safe with an advisory. Global models still aren't buying into NW ideas.

...The Artist Formerly Known as RJSnowLover...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Current grid forecast has 1-3". Rain or rain/snow mix until 10pm before it starts snowing. Then ends everything about 6am.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another reason why I buy a northern solution is bc this storm during both cycle 1 & 2 cut through N IL and a NAM solution may be the way to go.  This time there isn't much of a severe wx threat due to the cut-off LP near the Gulf of Mexico that is taking away that energy that would otherwise blossom out ahead of this system. 

 

During this 3rd cycle, the PV to the north is keeping the storm from cutting up through N IL this time around and the saving grace from a rain system.  I think NAM keeps the strength for 00z runs and track is similar to 18z.  It may come in even juicier as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

996 mb near Goodland at 12 hr. (12z tomorrow)

 

The way it's looking now, some members might have dry slot concerns.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

994 mb a bit west of Topeka at 18 hr.

 

So far just the far north band of precip.

 

Big time baroclinic zone.

 

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I told ya guys, high rez is the way to go with these dynamic systems.  I'm afraid this may cut too far NW and give us mixing issues up this way if it blows up earlier.  On the other hand, PV up north is strong enough to keep it south for N IL to be in the corridor of heavy snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I told ya guys, high rez is the way to go with these dynamic systems.  I'm afraid this may cut too far NW and give us mixing issues up this way if it blows up earlier.  On the other hand, PV up north is strong enough to keep it south for N IL to be in the corridor of heavy snow.

 

That's why I mentioned the dry slot issues.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the NAM smokin' something, or could it actually be right? Still will shift a bit more. This is bad timing for me...

 

Looking at sounding in NE IL there is a warm nose at ~800 mb leading up to 27 hours.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this transpires, LSD will be a standstill for morning commute with a howling wind off the lake.  Incredible if this run verifies.  This storm will be hitting at its peak around 4:00am - 7:00am.  Wednesday morning rush hour is going to be a standstill.  Insane if this verifies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe not much furthur north but that good or we be dealing with mix potential here. It's filled in and def more robust.

Yeah that thing BLEW UP in Northern Illinois and actually ended up being a better run for me than the 18z considering it came in just a tad further south initially. But, unfortunately, this is probably the NAM just being the NAM with QPF..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...