Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Currently have some reasonable general agreement on a decent system rolling through.  It's more of a Pacific system than a clipper, so it could have a somewhat respectable amount of moisture.  Looks like enough cold air for snow on the northern end.  Discuss. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, MKEstorm said:

The GFS keeps bumping this north and south. Back north again on the 12z run.

 

IMG_7732.jpeg

Juicy juicy and add some Lehs on top!  This is the type of system I loved to track back in Chi.  Hope it pans out as advertised.

  • Like 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, MKEstorm said:

…but the Canadian and ICON say NO!

GFS

IMG_7735.jpeg

GDPS

IMG_7736.jpeg

ICON

IMG_7737.jpeg

It's a difficult pattern and high bust potential on the placement of where the jet dynamics set up but I do like S WI/N IL being near the jackzone...points EAST look golden also into S MI...

image.thumb.png.992ba013c8f282911426ae7f2b7f435c.png

 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Hoosier said:

Arguably feels like we have worse model alignment now than yesterday.  lol

The Models have been awful for storms in the medium range.  Hardly looking at them at this point outside of a pattern look.  

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, indianajohn said:

NAM being decommissioned? 

 

Yeah.  Don't know the date but it's supposed to be sometime soon.

  • Like 1
Posted

Other than the NAM, have a pretty good consensus on being on the northern fringe here or even getting whiffed to the south.  Could still see some degree of shifting of course.

Posted
1 hour ago, Hoosier said:

Yeah.  Don't know the date but it's supposed to be sometime soon.

I heard March, being replaced by the RRFS.  

Posted

The ensembles across multiple model suites have a number of members with a more significant surface low in the Ohio Valley area than their op runs.  So given that and the NAM being farther north (even though the NAM can be goofy at this timeframe), I wouldn't be that surprised if this system becomes more robust/shifts north on future model runs.

  • Like 1
Posted

Boy did this not age well! Sad really. @Hoosier trying to force the hand of a pattern that's just not giving it up for Chicagoland. I'd gladly send you my clipper if I could. 

Winter 2025-26 Snow Total = 68.1  Largest Storm: 7.5" (11/29-30)    Snow/Ice Headlines: 20!!      Oct: 0.0 Nov:10.1 Dec: 17.1 Jan: 21.9  Feb: 7.1 Mar: 11.6 Apr: 0.3 (116% Normal Season)

Avg = 58.6"  (Harrison): 2024-25 = 55.3"   2023-24 = 53.1"             Avg = 45.0"  (KDTW): 2022-23 = 33.5"   2021-22 = 35.6"          Avg = 49.7"  (KRMY): 2020-21 = 36.2"   2019-20 = 48.0"   2018-19 = 56.1"   2017-18 = 68.3"    2016-17 = 52"    2015-16 = 57.4"    2014-15 = 55.3"    2013-14 = 100.6" (coldest & snowiest in the modern record!)  2012-13 = 47.2"    2011-12 = 43.7"

Legit Blizzards (high winds and dbl digit snows) I have personally experienced: Jan 2014, Feb 2011, Dec 2009, Jan 2005, Dec 2000, Jan 1999, Mar 1998, Nov 1995, Nov 1989, Jan 1978, Jan 1977, Apr 1975, Mar 1973

Posted

Yeah, kind of fizzled for sure.  Looks like a narrow area of light snow still possible though.  Anybody here in the path of that?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...