49% of Independents and 15% of Republicans think Trump should drop out of the race post-conviction. 54% of voters either "strongly" or "somewhat" approve of the guilty verdict. 68% said the punishment should be a fine.
https://www.axios.com/2024/06/01/poll-trump-conviction-election-independent-voters
I understand your disagreement and its more of a technical one that an actual one. Yes, as a weather hobbyist, I'm very aware that we can now usually get a pretty good idea of development regions 3 days in advance with pretty reliable skill.
The hedge with chaos theory and trouble there is putting that in an equation with and in direct opposition to equal and opposite reactions, fluid dynamics within a sphere, roles of elevated mixed layers in severe weather initiation, etc (and I'm probably pretty lost after that), but I just find too many holes there.
What I'm speaking to is that supercell storms on the scale of a May 1999 storm at Moore or a repeat in 2013 were not exactly within a scale of predictability in the sense that those storms developed so quickly and powerfully that I still think with all the ability in the world we couldn't solve the problem. Do I think it would be the most amazing thing ever? Yeah. I've thought of what something like that would be like for a long time.
Another part of using the NWS surveillance system or even doing this by satellite on a larger scale is going to be all the other types of harm that can be caused by stray radiation or microwaves.
The other question that a guy like me asks is, "If the climate is truly so fragile...." type-questions and I'd be here all day with you on those.
I don't have any experience operating radar, I'm sure there's a lot there that I obviously don't know. I haven't actually been taught very many of the things I do know, so I know there's much I can still learn. The plus sides are I don't and haven't learned in a defined construct with rules, per se. It gives me a different perspective.