Thanks, Trump!

Again, context. When I point to OLM's numbers, it's often after you used PDX, with specific data points you chose. And I've explained many times why OLM's long term records are better than PDX or SEA for comparing to historical benchmarks, records, etc.

If you're so worried about regional numbers then why do you never utilize or make reference to NOAA's climate database that exists for that exact purpose? You can pull statewide or regional rankings anytime on there. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/ There's plenty of regional data there to go around. Highlighting one specific inconsequential data point as a counterpoint under the guise of it being about "providing a regional context" simply comes across as contrarian oriented cherry-picking, at best. Should be kind of obvious.

I think environment Canada has been cutting back on some of the rural stations. Shawnigan Lake station is likely gone for good.

You’re clearly not up to date on the latest literature.