If I were somehow in Trump's shoes and my biggest priority was to win, I would pick a black man as my VP.
The image alone is going to sway some, maybe enough, in a very tight race
He certainly wouldn't lose votes....unless they're really really racist.
https://wapo.st/3yMMD0m
A subpoena is a subpoena for a reason. Checks and balances are checks and balances for a reason. If each party gets to start choosing which checks, which balances, which subpoenas they comply with and which ones they don't just because they don't deem it legitimate, that is a dangerously slippery slope.
And again, I find it odd that the party who are the self-proclaimed "saviors of democracy" doesn't see any issue with Garland's statement above. I think it's just another example of hypocrisy, which surely both sides deal with in spades, but makes the Democrats main election platform ("Trump is a danger to democracy") much less potent. He's only a danger to democracy because he will do things that aren't good for them. Which means this election is just like every other election we've had in this country.