Jump to content

January 2017 Observations and Model Discussion for the Pacific Northwest


Goducks09

Recommended Posts

According to NWS Seattle we have great news!! The airmass will be dry so any mention of snow in the lowlands have been dropped!! Isn't that just wonderful!!! I'm so happy!!! And my wife mentioned that she noticed the grass ( where we still have grass) is startling to grow! Let it spring Let it spring Let it spring!! :)

 

Nice! I'm guessing the freezing temperatures the last several mornings and the coming snow will keep our grass at bay for a little while yet! Let it winter!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like I have a good chance at passing 5' this season with the snow this coming week.

I have an excellent chance of not surpassing my 4 inches!!

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gem/2017012912/gem_asnow_nwus_20.png

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2017012912/gfs_asnow_nwus_25.png

 

 

 

12z NAM is fairly generous with pushing in the cold air fairly far south. Does show some light snow in the area by hr78 before the main precip. 850mb temps are really marginal on all models though. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wish the Puget Sound region could have scored something this month. It kind of sucks experiencing the best January in years regionally and realizing that everyone up north will forever refer to it with bitterness and vitriol since, by purely dumb luck, it failed to snow in the relatively narrow corridor that is of utmost importance to so many. 

 

Just a slightly better setup (a degree or two colder up there) on 1/9-1/10 would have made all the difference in how this month was viewed by Sounders.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wish the Puget Sound region could have scored something this month. It kind of sucks experiencing the best January in years regionally and realizing that everyone up north will forever refer to it with bitterness and vitriol since, by purely dumb luck, it failed to snow in the relatively narrow corridor that is of utmost importance to so many.

 

Just a slightly better setup (a degree or two colder up there) on 1/9-1/10 would have made all the difference in how this month was viewed by Sounders.

Always next year.

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gem/2017012912/gem_asnow_nwus_20.png

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2017012912/gfs_asnow_nwus_25.png

 

 

 

12z NAM is fairly generous with pushing in the cold air fairly far south. Does show some light snow in the area by hr78 before the main precip. 850mb temps are really marginal on all models though.

Anyone north of the 540 thickness line will be cold enough for snow. It's a low level seepage event with the actual arctic boundary well to the north, so the 850mb temps are largely irrelevant as long as they stay below freezing.

 

The winners will be those just north of the 540 line, where frontogenesis will be maximized along the lower level boundary. Looking like a fairly narrow area at this point, likely between Salem and Olympia.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Andrew once wisely mentioned, good Januaries tend to come in bunches historically!

Yep. I would bet January 18 or 19 will good.

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wish the Puget Sound region could have scored something this month. It kind of sucks experiencing the best January in years regionally and realizing that everyone up north will forever refer to it with bitterness and vitriol since, by purely dumb luck, it failed to snow in the relatively narrow corridor that is of utmost importance to so many.

 

Just a slightly better setup (a degree or two colder up there) on 1/9-1/10 would have made all the difference in how this month was viewed by Sounders.

If you're just looking at January, that snowless corridor extends north thru southern BC. The 4" here was an outlier on the high ends. Most people got nothing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're just looking at January, that snowless corridor extends north thru southern BC. The 4" here was an outlier on the high ends. Most people got nothing.

 

For places north of Centralia this winter will mostly be forgettable. Unless something amazing happens between now and beginning of March.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wish the Puget Sound region could have scored something this month. It kind of sucks experiencing the best January in years regionally and realizing that everyone up north will forever refer to it with bitterness and vitriol since, by purely dumb luck, it failed to snow in the relatively narrow corridor that is of utmost importance to so many.

 

Just a slightly better setup (a degree or two colder up there) on 1/9-1/10 would have made all the difference in how this month was viewed by Sounders.

Thank you for your honesty.

 

Up until now I assumed you wished only horrible things for our neighbors to the north.

  • Like 1

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone north of the 540 thickness line will be cold enough for snow. It's a low level seepage event with the actual arctic boundary well to the north, so the 850mb temps are largely irrelevant as long as they stay below freezing.

 

The winners will be those just north of the 540 line, where frontogenesis will be maximized along the lower level boundary. Looking like a fairly narrow area at this point, likely between Salem and Olympia.

 

Don't think it is a given that 850s will remain below freezing but I'm not sure how much of an issue 1c at 850mb is if the rest of the column is below freezing. 

 

Seems most of the models might be putting that boundary somewhere between SW WA and SLE. This is reminding me of a much crapier and more marginal version of 1/11/2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like the weather equivalent of white guilt. The majority of western Washington lowlanders will see this winter as pretty cold but pretty forgettable. Ouch.

 

I don't feel sorry for them so much as I do for us for having to deal with them throwing asterisks up every time we talk about this amazing winter. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think it is a given that 850s will remain below freezing but I'm not sure how much of an issue 1c at 850mb is if the rest of the column is below freezing.

 

Seems most of the models might be putting that boundary somewhere between SW WA and SLE. This is reminding me of a much crapier and more marginal version of 1/11/2017.

I saw they mentioned the 1-10 comparison, but this is more like 12-8 or 12-14, just a little crappier thanks to sun angles.

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think it is a given that 850s will remain below freezing but I'm not sure how much of an issue 1c at 850mb is if the rest of the column is below freezing.

 

Seems most of the models might be putting that boundary somewhere between SW WA and SLE. This is reminding me of a much crapier and more marginal version of 1/11/2017.

The winner is likely going to be someone who stays in the -1c to -3c ballpark at 850mb, so very marginal at that level. Models tend to underdo deformation in these setups and these weak boundaries do tend to be very stubborn and slow-moving, so I imagine somebody will score 6" or more from it with a fairly prolonged event.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't feel sorry for them so much as I do for us for having to deal with them throwing asterisks up every time we talk about this amazing winter. :P

True. I guess it's more like white supremacy.

 

Just narrow your focus and avoid diversity. Put Sounders on ignore and you'll soon convince yourself this was a regional blockbuster.

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. I guess it's more like white supremacy.

 

Just narrow your focus and avoid diversity. Put Sounders on ignore and you'll soon convince yourself this was a regional blockbuster.

 

Lets wait until March 15th to talk about how badly screwed Seattle got.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw they mentioned the 1-10 comparison, but this is more like 12-8 or 12-14, just a little crappier thanks to sun angles.

 

I thought we were colder on 12/14 with the cold air already in place? The cold air racing south into the eastern sides of the cascades and then coming to us via the gorge with the low approaching from the SW reminds me more of 1/10 even though the details are a bit different. Pretty much a given that this won't be anywhere nearly as widespread though. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw they mentioned the 1-10 comparison, but this is more like 12-8 or 12-14, just a little crappier thanks to sun angles.

Not too much like 12-8, that was a more traditional overrunning scenario.

 

This will be about deformation along a stalled boundary, so inherently hard to predict. Fairly similar to what produced the storm in late February 2014 in Whatcom County, also quite similar to a setup in mid February 1980.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...