Jump to content

February 2014 in the PNW


stuffradio

Recommended Posts

It's not further north than progged.  The models you looked at are just behind where 0z is 21z in reality etc ... It looks on track to the HRRR.  The way the SFC low is moving SW WA has a block that will prevent this from moving more north than progged.

<p>Southern California Weather Authority.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br>

TheWeatherSpace.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br><br>

SCWXA Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/">http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/</a><br>

SCWXA Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather">https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather</a><br><br>

TWS Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.theweatherspace.com/">http://www.theweatherspace.com/</a><br>

TWS Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork">https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork</a></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not further north than progged.  The models you looked at are just behind where 0z is 21z in reality etc ... It looks on track to the HRRR.  The way the SFC low is moving SW WA has a block that will prevent this from moving more north than progged.

 

Your profile pic looks like a bad Johnny Depp character.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not further north than progged.  The models you looked at are just behind where 0z is 21z in reality etc ... It looks on track to the HRRR.  The way the SFC low is moving SW WA has a block that will prevent this from moving more north than progged.

How far north do you think the precipitation will make it.

We come from the land of the ice and snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your profile pic looks like a bad Johnny Depp character.

That's me, ladies love it. 

<p>Southern California Weather Authority.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br>

TheWeatherSpace.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br><br>

SCWXA Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/">http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/</a><br>

SCWXA Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather">https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather</a><br><br>

TWS Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.theweatherspace.com/">http://www.theweatherspace.com/</a><br>

TWS Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork">https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork</a></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.   It does not melt at 37 and sunshine.  Its evaporates in our dry, arctic air.    :lol:

 

Got an e-mail from my mom who said the 2 inches of snow there has all melted.    I will tell she is mistaken.     It subliminated in 2 hours of mid-day February sunshine!   

Snow doesn't melt at 37? Thanks to explanations on here, I have been made aware of the power of sublimation or when snow is precipitating, the wet-bulb effect. Not sure why you have a laugh-face at the idea of snow not melting at 37?  It is interesting to watch how the snow sublimates at a temperature below freezing. It also makes sense that when it is sublimating and melting at the same time it would disappear in the sun pretty fast. Not sure why you are still going on about the great BLI snow melt of February 7, 2014? There is a much more interesting event going on just to the south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How far north do you think the precipitation will make it.

Lewis County, WA ... there is a block evident later and that batch of snow in NW OR will slow down as the afternoon/evening progresses.

<p>Southern California Weather Authority.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br>

TheWeatherSpace.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br><br>

SCWXA Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/">http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/</a><br>

SCWXA Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather">https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather</a><br><br>

TWS Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.theweatherspace.com/">http://www.theweatherspace.com/</a><br>

TWS Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork">https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork</a></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snow doesn't melt at 37? Thanks to explanations on here, I have been made aware of the power of sublimation or when snow is precipitating, the wet-bulb effect. Not sure why you have a laugh-face at the idea of snow not melting at 37?  It is interesting to watch how the snow sublimates at a temperature below freezing. It also makes sense that when it is sublimating and melting at the same time it would disappear in the sun pretty fast. Not sure why you are still going on about the great BLI snow melt of February 7, 2014? There is a much more interesting event going on just to the south.

 

You are going on about it.   I posted one comment that it was melting fast... since I had posted pictures of the snow this morning.     It did melt fast.   I assure you that when the air temp is 32 on a sunny February day... the surface temps in the sun are much warmer.    Causing snow to "melt".   :)

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell you what though the next storm that hits in a few days is all rain in the OR Valley and some mountain areas so that's going to be a flood issue.  Could need a Flood Watch, and Flash Flood Watch ..

<p>Southern California Weather Authority.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br>

TheWeatherSpace.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br><br>

SCWXA Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/">http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/</a><br>

SCWXA Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather">https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather</a><br><br>

TWS Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.theweatherspace.com/">http://www.theweatherspace.com/</a><br>

TWS Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork">https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork</a></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not further north than progged.  The models you looked at are just behind where 0z is 21z in reality etc ... It looks on track to the HRRR.  The way the SFC low is moving SW WA has a block that will prevent this from moving more north than progged.

That is a clear way of stating what is keeping us colder and unfortunately without much snow. I'm still hoping that the old idea of the models underestimating precipitation will work to my and others favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not further north than progged.  The models you looked at are just behind where 0z is 21z in reality etc ... It looks on track to the HRRR.  The way the SFC low is moving SW WA has a block that will prevent this from moving more north than progged.

STFU AND GO AWAY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you referring to the overall progress or intensity? 

 

or both?

Both, and you can see the curve to the ENE starting from Tillamook, OR right now ... so that's the ENE turn this will start taking as it gets blocked over Lewis County, WA

<p>Southern California Weather Authority.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br>

TheWeatherSpace.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br><br>

SCWXA Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/">http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/</a><br>

SCWXA Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather">https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather</a><br><br>

TWS Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.theweatherspace.com/">http://www.theweatherspace.com/</a><br>

TWS Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork">https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork</a></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are going on about it.   I posted one comment that it was melting fast... since I had posted pictures of the snow this morning.     It did melt fast.   I assure you that when the air temp is 32 on a sunny February day... the surface temps in the sun are much warmer.    Causing snow to "melt".   :)

Surface temps in the sun are warmer? Who would've thunk it. No wonder it feels much warmer outside today than the thermometer says. I'm going on about what? What is this "it" you refer to?

 

When you stop posting these stirling posts about the most interesting of weather. Then I'll probably not respond to the posts that aren't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not further north than progged.  The models you looked at are just behind where 0z is 21z in reality etc ... It looks on track to the HRRR.  The way the SFC low is moving SW WA has a block that will prevent this from moving more north than progged.

Coastal radar disagrees.  

 

The moisture is streaming NE towards the central coast of Washington, which was not progged.  

 

We shall see in the next few hours what the outcome will be.

 

I say it snows here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the radar and how moist the column should be, I was thinking the snow would come in like a wall here, going from nothing to SN+ in only a few minutes. As of now, though, even with good echoes overhead, nothing's falling (EDIT: flurries just started). Hopefully the dry east winds won't be too much of a problem here. Looks like very good snow in far southwest PDX, in any case:

http://www.tripcheck.com/RoadCams/cams/i5haines_pid562.jpg?1391777515

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell you what though the next storm that hits in a few days is all rain in the OR Valley and some mountain areas so that's going to be a flood issue.  Could need a Flood Watch, and Flash Flood Watch ..

I was wondering when this would come up. Hopefully the snow melts slower down in the valley. The Willamette falls will look spectacular next week if the snow is washed away by heavy rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coastal radar disagrees.  

 

The moisture is streaming NE towards the central coast of Washington, which was not progged.  

 

We shall see in the next few hours what the outcome will be.

 

I say it snows here.

I watched some of that yesterday at one point and it looked like it hit a wall and just disappeared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you attach images here without linking them ...

<p>Southern California Weather Authority.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br>

TheWeatherSpace.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br><br>

SCWXA Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/">http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/</a><br>

SCWXA Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather">https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather</a><br><br>

TWS Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.theweatherspace.com/">http://www.theweatherspace.com/</a><br>

TWS Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork">https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork</a></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the radar and how moist the column should be, I was thinking the snow would come in like a wall here, going from nothing to SN+ in only a few minutes. As of now, though, even with good echoes overhead, nothing's falling (EDIT: flurries just started). Hopefully the dry east winds won't be too much of a problem here. Looks like very good snow in far southwest PDX, in any case:

http://www.tripcheck.com/RoadCams/cams/i5haines_pid562.jpg?1391777515

I would think that hanging on to the dry cold air longer would be good. It will stretch out the event for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clouding up here.

 

IR satellite is definitely show a northerly trend.

 

 

Clouds will increase this afternoon... flurries will get there this evening.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh then if that's all you're asking for then that's right.  There's enough moisture to make it to Puget Sound later on.

<p>Southern California Weather Authority.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br>

TheWeatherSpace.com CEO and Senior Meteorologist<br><br>

SCWXA Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/">http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/</a><br>

SCWXA Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather">https://www.facebook.com/SouthernCaliforniaWeather</a><br><br>

TWS Website - <a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.theweatherspace.com/">http://www.theweatherspace.com/</a><br>

TWS Facebook - <a class="bbc_url" href="https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork">https://www.facebook.com/TheWeatherSpaceNetwork</a></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh then if that's all you're asking for then that's right.  There's enough moisture to make it to Puget Sound later on.

?

 

If it snows/flurries here, the only model that showed it is the EURO.

 

All other models were dry.

 

And the coastal radar says the EURO is mostly likely correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1795168_420925638042023_385476518_o.jpg

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are going on about it.   I posted one comment that it was melting fast... since I had posted pictures of the snow this morning.     It did melt fast.   I assure you that when the air temp is 32 on a sunny February day... the surface temps in the sun are much warmer.    Causing snow to "melt".   :)

I was going to count how many pictures you posted of the melting snow in BLI, but I lost count. You aren't going on about it. Haha.  :lol:

 

PS: Thanks for repeating the information about surface temps in the sun being much warmer, not sure everyone got that.  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...