Jump to content

GHD III Winter Storm Possibility, Feb. 1st-3rd


Geos

Recommended Posts

Normally don't post GFS numbers....  but more than six tenths QPF in six hours bears posting the numbers.  Hope it pans out.  Reminds me of Dec 8 2009; we got more than 16" that storm

TUE 06Z 02-FEB  -2.5    -5.5    1018      86      98    0.00     547     533    TUE 12Z 02-FEB  -4.4    -5.9    1012      95      99    0.23     545     536    TUE 18Z 02-FEB  -4.3    -6.6    1003      93      99    0.61     538     535    WED 00Z 03-FEB  -5.3   -10.6    1002      89      99    0.30     525     524    WED 06Z 03-FEB  -9.1   -12.6    1008      89     100    0.07     524     518    WED 12Z 03-FEB -14.8   -13.7    1018      88      57    0.01     530     516    WED 18Z 03-FEB -14.3   -15.5    1024      84      12    0.00     531     513    
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Normally don't post GFS numbers....  but more than six tenths QPF in six hours bears posting the numbers.  Hope it pans out.  Reminds me of Dec 8 2009; we got more than 16" that storm

TUE 06Z 02-FEB  -2.5    -5.5    1018      86      98    0.00     547     533    TUE 12Z 02-FEB  -4.4    -5.9    1012      95      99    0.23     545     536    TUE 18Z 02-FEB  -4.3    -6.6    1003      93      99    0.61     538     535    WED 00Z 03-FEB  -5.3   -10.6    1002      89      99    0.30     525     524    WED 06Z 03-FEB  -9.1   -12.6    1008      89     100    0.07     524     518    WED 12Z 03-FEB -14.8   -13.7    1018      88      57    0.01     530     516    WED 18Z 03-FEB -14.3   -15.5    1024      84      12    0.00     531     513    

 

I remember that storm. Early season warmer lake waters really cut into totals here. Ended up at about 4", when about a foot was forecast.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean

 

<3

 

 

 

 

Nudge that freezing line south just a tad and it's all snow here.

 

CMC is pretty interesting to say the least.

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that the CMC does not have a strong wave on Sunday.

 

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Individual systems:

 

http://weather.gc.ca/data/ensemble/images/2016012900_054_E1_north@america_I_ENSEMBLE_pnm@gemglb@gem007_120.png

 

http://weather.gc.ca/data/ensemble/images/2016012900_054_E1_north@america_I_ENSEMBLE_pnm@gem008@gem016_120.png

 

http://weather.gc.ca/data/ensemble/images/2016012900_054_E1_north@america_I_ENSEMBLE_pnm@gem017@gem020_120.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the snow maps must be off on the GFS.  Not only does the low pass through or just south of MKE, the black 0C line on Earl Barker's maps are north of here much of the time of greatest precip.  Hard to buy those amounts on the southern flank even if there is that much moisture.

 

Low passes way south of Milwaukee 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost all of them are south and east of the operational GFS.

 

True, but they are also hundreds of miles apart even, whereas the spread on the GFS is much less. I'll stick with the GFS, despite it shifting, it's been showing a snowband within 100 miles around here for over a hundred hours at this point. It'd be a huge slap in the face if the DGEX was right all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost all of them are south and east of the operational GFS.

GGEM ensembles came in a tad SE of 12z runs..,UKIE came in SE also..it would put us in a great spot.  BTW, the UKIE track is identical placement where the 12z EPS mean had the Low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but they are also hundreds of miles apart even, whereas the spread on the GFS is much less. I'll stick with the GFS, despite it shifting, it's been showing a snowband within 100 miles around here for over a hundred hours at this point. It'd be a huge slap in the face if the DGEX was right all along.

 

True, I think Lincoln will do pretty well, Omaha may be a different story depending on the orientation of the storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By this time tomorrow night we'll be within 100 hours or so, and by 12z Saturday we will be getting into NAM range lol 

Tracking this storm from 10+ days out has been something...I don't recall tracking one like this for so long...its pretty remarkable that there hasn't been 1 fluke run with no storm on all the models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but they are also hundreds of miles apart even, whereas the spread on the GFS is much less. I'll stick with the GFS, despite it shifting, it's been showing a snowband within 100 miles around here for over a hundred hours at this point. It'd be a huge slap in the face if the DGEX was right all along.

Its usually a bad sign if the DGEX is too far south since it is usually amped and NW. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GGEM ensembles came in a tad SE of 12z runs..,UKIE came in SE also..it would put us in a great spot. BTW, the UKIE track is identical placement where the 12z EPS mean had the Low.

I understand you like the overall ukie track for your back yard but it is probably pretty lame overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...