Jump to content

November 2017 PNW Discussion Thread


stuffradio

Recommended Posts

After Christmas. :)

 

End of Hanukkah.  ;)  

Cold Season 2023/24:

Total snowfall: 26"

Highest daily snowfall: 5"

Deepest snow depth: 12"

Coldest daily high: -20ºF

Coldest daily low: -42ºF

Number of subzero days: 5

Personal Weather Station on Wunderground: 

https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KMTBOZEM152#history

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking somewhere around the 20th - 23rd.

New Years Eve. Arctic front moves through SEA @ 5:57pm on December 31st, rain changes to snow by 11:28pm as temperatures plunge from 56*F to 29*F over 6hrs.

 

Midnight high of 29*F, falling to 17*F by 10AM on January 1st while snow continues to fall. Snow ends by 4pm, skies clear overnight and temps plummet to 4*F by sunrise the next day.

 

Snowfall total @ SeaTac is 11.7". Next snowstorm is only three days away..00z ECMWF is a storm king repeat. Jim and Rob are throwing blizzard parties. Tim is downplaying. Dewey is above the fray.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Years Eve. Arctic front moves through SEA @ 5:57pm on December 31st, rain changes to snow by 11:28pm as temperatures plunge from 56*F to 29*F over 6hrs.

 

Midnight high of 29*F, falling to 17*F by 10AM on January 1st while snow continues to fall. Snow ends by 4pm, skies clear overnight and temps plummet to 4*F by sunrise the next day.

I have never seen anything that extreme here ever. So I approve and ... I hope you’re sooo right!! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Years Eve. Arctic front moves through SEA @ 5:57pm on December 31st, rain changes to snow by 11:28pm as temperatures plunge from 56*F to 29*F over 6hrs.

 

Midnight high of 29*F, falling to 17*F by 10AM on January 1st while snow continues to fall. Snow ends by 4pm, skies clear overnight and temps plummet to 4*F by sunrise the next day.

Sounds like -30c to me!

  • Like 1

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Years Eve. Arctic front moves through SEA @ 5:57pm on December 31st, rain changes to snow by 11:28pm as temperatures plunge from 56*F to 29*F over 6hrs.

 

Midnight high of 29*F, falling to 17*F by 10AM on January 1st while snow continues to fall. Snow ends by 4pm, skies clear overnight and temps plummet to 4*F by sunrise the next day.

 

Snowfall total @ SeaTac is 11.7". Next snowstorm is only three days away..00z ECMWF is a storm king repeat. Jim and Rob are throwing blizzard parties. Tim is downplaying. Dewey is above the fray.

Most believable winter forecast I’ve heard yet!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're about to embark on an incredible +PNA run. Anything above 300 is very high, and we're forecast to see several days near 400 or higher.

 

4indices.png

 

Here are -ENSO/neutral years that had major +PNA for at least a week in the Nov 25 - Dec 15 period, with the peak daily number.

 

1949 (+395 on 11/26)

1962 (+495 on 12/11)

1964 (+291 on 12/7)

1974 (+307 on 12/2)

1981 (+220 on 12/12)

1985 (+234 on 12/5)

1988 (+374 on 12/4)

1989 (+476 on 12/3)

1995 (+309 on 12/11)

2000 (+212 on 12/1)

2008 (+300 on 11/27)

 

The only ones that approached or surpassed the values we're expected to see are 1949, 1962, 1988, and 1989.

 

As you can see from the image above, we're also expected to have -NAO dominate over the next 10 days or so, though not as strong as the +PNA.

 

The years that saw NAO of at least -150 during their +PNA periods: 1949, 1962, 1981, 1989, 1995, and 2008.

 

1962 and 1989 are easily the best overall pattern matches to what we're seeing, in my opinion, followed by 1995 and 1981. Those are my top 4 analogs going forward, and a common theme is clear: blocky winters that favored cold in the East early, but cold shifting more west (including the PNW) later on.

  • Like 4

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're about to embark on an incredible +PNA run. Anything above 300 is very high, and we're forecast to see several days near 400 or higher.

 

attachicon.gif4indices.png

 

Here are -ENSO/neutral years that had major +PNA for at least a week in the Nov 25 - Dec 15 period, with the peak daily number.

 

1949 (+395 on 11/26)

1962 (+495 on 12/11)

1964 (+291 on 12/7)

1974 (+307 on 12/2)

1981 (+220 on 12/12)

1985 (+234 on 12/5)

1988 (+374 on 12/4)

1989 (+476 on 12/3)

1995 (+309 on 12/11)

2000 (+212 on 12/1)

2008 (+300 on 11/27)

 

The only ones that approached or surpassed the values we're expected to see are 1949, 1962, 1988, and 1989.

 

As you can see from the image above, we're also expected to have -NAO dominate over the next 10 days or so, though not as strong as the +PNA.

 

The years that saw NAO of at least -150 during their +PNA periods: 1949, 1962, 1981, 1989, 1995, and 2008.

 

1962 and 1989 are easily the best overall pattern matches to what we're seeing, in my opinion, followed by 1995 and 1981. Those are my top 4 analogs going forward, and a common theme is clear: blocky winters that favored cold in the East early, but cold shifting more west (including the PNW) later on.

This is a great post!

 

Several of those years were huge Winters for us! Jan 1950!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're about to embark on an incredible +PNA run. Anything above 300 is very high, and we're forecast to see several days near 400 or higher.

 

attachicon.gif4indices.png

 

Here are -ENSO/neutral years that had major +PNA for at least a week in the Nov 25 - Dec 15 period, with the peak daily number.

 

1949 (+395 on 11/26)

1962 (+495 on 12/11)

1964 (+291 on 12/7)

1974 (+307 on 12/2)

1981 (+220 on 12/12)

1985 (+234 on 12/5)

1988 (+374 on 12/4)

1989 (+476 on 12/3)

1995 (+309 on 12/11)

2000 (+212 on 12/1)

2008 (+300 on 11/27)

 

The only ones that approached or surpassed the values we're expected to see are 1949, 1962, 1988, and 1989.

 

As you can see from the image above, we're also expected to have -NAO dominate over the next 10 days or so, though not as strong as the +PNA.

 

The years that saw NAO of at least -150 during their +PNA periods: 1949, 1962, 1981, 1989, 1995, and 2008.

 

1962 and 1989 are easily the best overall pattern matches to what we're seeing, in my opinion, followed by 1995 and 1981. Those are my top 4 analogs going forward, and a common theme is clear: blocky winters that favored cold in the East early, but cold shifting more west (including the PNW) later on.

I approve of 2008.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a great post!

 

Several of those years were huge Winters for us! Jan 1950!

 

Well...in 1949 the PNA crashed on 12/9 (and you'll notice it also peaked earlier on 11/26) and basically remained tanked until early February. Looks unlikely we'll see a pattern shift this year that soon. But you never know!

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're about to embark on an incredible +PNA run. Anything above 300 is very high, and we're forecast to see several days near 400 or higher.

 

attachicon.gif4indices.png

 

Here are -ENSO/neutral years that had major +PNA for at least a week in the Nov 25 - Dec 15 period, with the peak daily number.

 

1949 (+395 on 11/26)

1962 (+495 on 12/11)

1964 (+291 on 12/7)

1974 (+307 on 12/2)

1981 (+220 on 12/12)

1985 (+234 on 12/5)

1988 (+374 on 12/4)

1989 (+476 on 12/3)

1995 (+309 on 12/11)

2000 (+212 on 12/1)

2008 (+300 on 11/27)

 

The only ones that approached or surpassed the values we're expected to see are 1949, 1962, 1988, and 1989.

 

As you can see from the image above, we're also expected to have -NAO dominate over the next 10 days or so, though not as strong as the +PNA.

 

The years that saw NAO of at least -150 during their +PNA periods: 1949, 1962, 1981, 1989, 1995, and 2008.

 

1962 and 1989 are easily the best overall pattern matches to what we're seeing, in my opinion, followed by 1995 and 1981. Those are my top 4 analogs going forward, and a common theme is clear: blocky winters that favored cold in the East early, but cold shifting more west (including the PNW) later on.

 

A good number of those winters featured at least one really cold month...many with significant snowfall also.  Nature loves to do complete reversals.

  • Like 2

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2023-24 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 1.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 1

Total Hail = 0.0

Total Ice = 0.2

Coldest Low = 13

Lows 32 or below = 45

Highs 32 or below = 3

Lows 20 or below = 3

Highs 40 or below = 9

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be 75 degrees at the ski resorts under that ridge

 

The ones that aren't passes perhaps.  The passes usually have a shallow layer of cold air flowing in from Central WA.

  • Like 1

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2023-24 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 1.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 1

Total Hail = 0.0

Total Ice = 0.2

Coldest Low = 13

Lows 32 or below = 45

Highs 32 or below = 3

Lows 20 or below = 3

Highs 40 or below = 9

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worth noting that 1962, 1981, 1989, and 1995 all saw -PNA dominate for most of January into February. That includes 1989-90, which even though it had a very -PNA January, didn't really get cold until February when the EPO finally went negative.

 

But given where we're at with solar and the October/November patterns, I think odds are much more in favor of getting cold in January, possibly late December.  :)

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good number of those winters featured at least one really cold month...many with significant snowfall also.  Nature loves to do complete reversals.

 

Indeed.

 

You've mentioned many times how extremes beget extremes, and that's certainly evident when looking at these numbers. Years like 2011, 2007, 2000, 1999, 1975, 1974, etc just didn't see the same highly amplified patterns leading up to winter like we're seeing this year.

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed.

 

You've mentioned many times how extremes beget extremes, and that's certainly evident when looking at these numbers. Years like 2011, 2007, 2000, 1999, 1975, 1974, etc just didn't see the same highly amplified patterns leading up to winter like we're seeing this year.

 

Eh, November/December 2000 was pretty amplified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, November/December 2000 was pretty amplified.

 

True, of that bunch 2000 was the most blocky/amplified.

 

But it still wasn't quite on 2017's level. The upcoming +PNA will almost certainly be greater than any +PNA episode that fall, and the -EPO block we saw in late Oct/early Nov easily beats anything seen fall 2000.

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2000-01 is a sticky wicket. Had a lot of the trappings of what could have been the lead up to a great winter with a cold, blocky fall, but then it just sort of fell apart.

 

I thought 2000 was one of the better analogs back in October, but given how the pattern has evolved since then, I don't see it as a leading analog now. Couldn't have had a much more dissimilar November nationally.

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2000-01 is a sticky wicket. Had a lot of the trappings of what could have been the lead up to a great winter with a cold, blocky fall, but then it just sort of fell apart.

 

Yeah, things set up too far east early on and then that midwinter was a huge disappointment where basically nothing happened weatherwise. A rare combo of persistently dry weather and warm anomalies in January. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, things set up too far east early on and then that midwinter was a huge disappointment where basically nothing happened weatherwise. A rare combo of persistently dry weather and warm anomalies in January.

A certain 25 year old budding lawyer was enjoying some life changing cold anomalies in Omak that winter, if I recall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...