Jump to content

January 2014 in the PNW


TT-SEA

Recommended Posts

So a positive AO keeps artic air locked into Canada and a -AO causes it to *spill* to the deep south?  Does this concide with other factors like if it's a -AO and a negative NAO combined that will make it more likely for the East coast to be targeted with a PV? 

 

On the other hand if there is a -AO and a -PNA on the West Coast which is the best coast we will have ours?

 

Anyways what is the status of the PNA? I once found a site that had all the ocean telecommunications in one index so I could access whatever I wanted but now when looking for it I couldn't find it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made an educated guess based on last night's Euro ensembles. Didn't work out. What if it had? Would I suddenly be a prophetic genius? The reasoning behind the guess was the same, regardless. I didn't make it just because.

 

If the Euro ensembles had been way worse than the op last night I would have predicted the opposite.

 

 

Doubt it.

 

You would have found something else cold-looking and based your 'positive' forecast on that instead.  

 

How could you come on here and predict that the ECMWF would trend worse before it came out?     That would be thinking negative!      You eliminate half the options when forcing yourself to think and say only positive things when talking about the weather.    Just silly since nature don't play that way.    :)

 

This is at the heart of my issue with Jim... only say positive things.   Skew everything to make it look so great... and then ignore when you are wrong and move on to the next thing.    Then when 1 out of 10 hits you call yourself a great forecaster and continue on.     And then endlessly criticize everyone on here for being so negative and depressing when they discuss reality.   This forum becomes just a pulpit for cold thinking.

 

Remember when he was so angry that I was pessimistic about Christmas?   He was telling me that its silly to be down about one bad week in a great winter.   It was going to turn around immediately after.    That was over a month ago.     Good pep talk... but not logical when looking back.    I have still loved the outcome just for a different reason.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a positive AO keeps artic air locked into Canada and a -AO causes it to *spill* to the deep south? Does this concide with other factors like if it's a -AO and a negative NAO combined that will make it more likely for the East coast to be targeted with a PV?

 

On the other hand if there is a -AO and a -PNA on the West Coast which is the best coast we will have ours?

 

Anyways what is the status of the PNA? I once found a site that had all the ocean telecommunications in one index so I could access whatever I wanted but now when looking for it I couldn't find it.

It's a complicated affair. It doesn't matter whether the overall NAM is + or -, but rather the strength/location of the PV and the height of the PV column.

 

The tropospheric circulation is determined by a number of factors, including tropical forcings, stratospheric forcings, and solar forcings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All that being said... I seem to remember the models went completely off the rails before the December event and then came back with a vengeance.

 

Something to watch for... have to be honest about the possibilities.     Its not all negative either.    There is a still chance!

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it makes you guys feel any better, I'm still well below average in snowfall so far, and I have patches of bare grass showing. In fact, I'm running behind 2011-12.. :lol:

 

Also, the circulation pattern over the Arctic has been fantastic for ice growth! The -DA circulation is pushing the multi-year ice west into the Beaufort Sea. We now have multi-year ice slamming into the Russian coast for the first time in at least a decade:

 

http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/hycomARC/navo/arcticictn_nowcast_anim30d.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More good news... the 12Z ECMWF ensemble mean is considerably better than the operational run for next week.

 

At 216 hours... the 850mb temp ensemble mean at SEA is about -6C and on the operational run its about -2C

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to hear. Thanks for posting such positively amidst a sea of negative turds.

 

 

I did find the 850mb temp data... changed my post after you quoted me.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Monty67

More good news... the 12Z ECMWF ensemble mean is considerably better than the operational run for next week.

 

At 216 hours... the 850mb temp ensemble mean at SEA is about -6C and on the operational run its about -2C

Where do you get the maps/temps for the euro ensemble mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everett Snowfall (510 feet elevation)

Snow since February 2019: 91"

2023-24: 6"

2022-23: 17.5"

2021-22: 17.75"

2020-21: 14.5”

2019-20: 10.5"

2018-19: 24.75"

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where do you get the maps/temps for the euro ensemble mean?

 

 

Here:

 

http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/charts/medium/eps/ensm/essential!Geopotential%20at%20500hPa!North%20America!0!pop!od!enfo!plot_ensm_essential!2014012812!!/

 

I later noticed they had a 850mb temp option on the left.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt it.

 

You would have found something else cold-looking and based your 'positive' forecast on that instead.

 

How could you come on here and predict that the ECMWF would trend worse before it came out? That would be thinking negative! You eliminate half the options when forcing yourself to think and say only positive things when talking about the weather. Just silly since nature don't play that way. :)

 

This is at the heart of my issue with Jim... only say positive things. Skew everything to make it look so great... and then ignore when you are wrong and move on to the next thing. Then when 1 out of 10 hits you call yourself a great forecaster and continue on. And then endlessly criticize everyone on here for being so negative and depressing when they discuss reality. This forum becomes just a pulpit for cold thinking.

 

Remember when he was so angry that I was pessimistic about Christmas? He was telling me that its silly to be down about one bad week in a great winter. It was going to turn around immediately after. That was over a month ago. Good pep talk... but not logical when looking back. I have still loved the outcome just for a different reason.

Boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "Sun Angle" argument gets old after five years. Tell this to those who live in the mid west or the mid Atlantic, when a mid February arctic event is baring down. I know that the sun can influence marginal events, but the upper atmospheric heating doesn't destroy our chances until mid March.

Exactly. If anything, we have more cold air available now up north than we do n mid December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boring.

 

Right.

 

Only say positive things!     This forum should only exist to delude ourselves in a fantasy world... not to understand the hard reality of nature and atmospheric science.   :)

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. If anything, you have more cold air available now than you did on December 15.

 

The sun angle begins to mitigate marginal situations when you are not deep in the bowels of all that available genuine cold air.     February is basically October in reverse for the sun angle.   That is why the average high slowly increases throughout the month.     

 

But if you get into some serious cold air... and better yet with precipitation... then it won't have much of an effect yet.    Unfortunately... we usually live in the margins out here.   :)

 

There are some notable exceptions though.    1989 is a great example.   15/8 here with a foot of snow on the ground.    Sun angle be damned then!

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gotta say watching this slugfest of emotion andbitter rivalry among members is fascinating and downright ugly at the same time.

 

So much mud slinging about sun angle, analogs, bad and good model runs, temp departures etc. is pure gold from a dysfunctional standpoint.

 

With that said I feel there really is no need to get riled up over details that wont iron out until almost the last possible moment.

 

But to each their own

 

Let the poo flinging continue if it must :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 18z GFS verifies the Great Lakes may set a record for ice coverage. That is crazy cold.

 

This has been the coldest winter I've ever experienced. My high temp once again failed to get above 0F today. Looks like we're going to get a break from the extreme cold, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Winterdog

That pesky ridge at 135/140 sure hasn't been our friend this winter. It has blocked us from the rain all month and now it's shunting any chance of cold air to the east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 18z GFS verifies the Great Lakes may set a record for ice coverage. That is crazy cold.

 

This has been the coldest winter I've ever experienced. My high temp once again failed to get above 0F today. Looks like we're going to get a break from the extreme cold, though.

 

 

Awesome news!   I am so excited.    <_>

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome news! I am so excited. <_>

 

I'm cool with swapping houses if you agree to pay my heating bill.. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm cool with swapping houses if you agree to pay my heating bill.. :)

 

That is OK.

 

Unlike many others on here... I have loved this winter.    So quiet and enjoyable.    Seems like we have been outside all winter.   We are heading to Hawaii in 16 days and I am not even sick of winter yet... which I figured I would be at this point.    

 

Snow and cold or dry and sunny.     Either way I am happy.      

 

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is OK.

 

Unlike many others on here... I have loved this winter here. So quiet and enjoyable. Seems like we have been outside all winter. We are heading to Hawaii in 16 days and I am not even sick of winter yet... which I figured I would be at this point.

 

Snow and cold or dry and sunny. Either way I am happy.

 

Awesome. Where in, exactly? I visited to Kauai as a kid, and will never forget it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...