Jump to content

August 2016 Observations and Model Discussion for the Pacific Northwest


Geos

Recommended Posts

Some warming in the ENSO regions in the last week...

 

http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/bleaching5km/images_current/cur_b05kmnn_ssttrend_007d_large.gif

 

Here is the latest SSTA map...

 

http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/bleaching5km/images_current/cur_b05kmnn_ssta_large.gif

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The different runs of each model run data the same. The 6z and 18z GFS use slightly older data so their is a belief they may be inherently less reliable. There is no specific reason either run can't be accurate however.

They don't use "older data". Every cycle utilizes a slew of updated satellite derived observations, which are by far the largest component of the ingested data aggregate. All cycles (00z/06z/12z/18z) also utilize radiosonde data the current cycle and several older cycles for hindcasting and extrapolative reasons, however give that more radiosonde are launched at 00z/12z vs 06z/18z, there is indeed more "older" radiosonde data utilized in the 06z/18z than there is in the 00z/12z cycles, but not significantly so.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noob question here....Do the different model runs (i.e. 6z vs 12z) focus on different aspects of the forecast, or analyze the data in a different way? I ask because over my year or so of lurking on this forum I have noticed a few times where someone would mention an unusual characteristic or outlier for a given model run, to which someone will reply "oh that because its the 6z run"

 

I read into it that the model run in question is (presumably) programmed with a specific bias.

 

I have't quite been able to tell if it's sarcasm or a genuine observation as there is rarely follow up dialogue.

The detonations you're referencing here (06z, 12z, 18z, 00z) are zulu hours...00z corresponds to 5pmPDT/4pm PST, 06z is 11pm PDT/10pmPST, and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Already up to Dewey's forecast high. Ouch.

71 would be nice

2013/2014 Winter season

Coldest Low: 14 F December 7th

Coldest High: 27.3 F December 7th

Coldest Wind chill: 5 F December 7th

Lowest Dew Point: -2.2 F December 6th

Days below freezing: 5

Total Snowfall: 11 inches

Most snowfall in a Day: 8 inches

Days With Snow: 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some warming in the ENSO regions in the last week...

 

 

Here is the latest SSTA map...

 

 

Modoki la Niña in the works?

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Modoki la Niña in the works?

 

 

Not sure... there was warming in the western ENSO regions as well.   

 

Watch the 30 day loop... I think in the next week that warmer water in the eastern regions will continue to spread westward.

 

http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/bleaching5km/animation_current/ssta_animation_30day_large.gif

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure... there was warming in the western ENSO regions as well.

 

Watch the 30 day loop... I think in the next week that warmer water in the eastern regions will continue to spread westward.

 

http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/bleaching5km/animation_current/ssta_animation_30day_large.gif

Until it is mixed out by the next trade wind burst..subsurface anomalies are well below average with another oceanic KW now developing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until it is mixed out by the next trade wind burst..subsurface anomalies are well below average with another oceanic KW now developing.

Nope, this will become an El Niño to punish the cool freaks who are enjoying the upcoming troughy period. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CFS and latest ECMWF weeklies are really warm from mid-September through mid-October (never had access to these models).

 

On the flip side... the 12Z ECMWF shows SEA below 70 for the next 10 days. Also shows PDX below 70 until Sunday and then only low 70s after that time.

 

Last year SEA was in the 60s for 8 consecutive days beginning on 8/30. And the rest of September did not torch last year. It was basically normal for the remainder of September.

Verbatim, I don't recall seeing the EPS weeklies predict cooler than average temperatures over the PNW beyond d20 all summer.

 

I would recommend taking note of where the highest 500mb heights are forecasted, and extrapolate from there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until it is mixed out by the next trade wind burst..subsurface anomalies are well below average with another oceanic KW now developing.

 

OK.    Good information.

 

Running the loop... the warmer water is being pushed westward.     And the 90-day loop is even more pronounced in fading the cooler anomalies.

 

I am sure its evil to some people to discuss anything but signs of a strengthening Nina  (and I don't mean you).  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting development today..seems like both the EPS and GEFS reignite the MJO or some sort of intraseasonal propagatory wave. Manifests clearly over the Pacific/WHEM starting later next week.

 

Extrapolating from there, one expect an initial reduction in trades over the ENSO regions through week2, followed by a trade wind burst during week3 as the wave propagates back into the EHEM domain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, this will become an El Niño to punish the cool freaks who are enjoying the upcoming troughy period. :)

Please secure the lame humor and make way for intellectual discussion.

 

There is no way a nino develops between now and winter. Weak nina/cool neutral is far more likely.

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please secure the lame humor and make way for intellectual discussion.

 

There is no way a nino develops between now and winter. Weak nina/cool neutral is far more likely.

Settle down.

 

So how about those bogus 70s continuing at PDX?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK. Good information.

 

Running the loop... the warmer water is being pushed westward. And the 90-day loop is even more pronounced in fading the cooler anomalies.

 

I am sure its evil to some people to discuss anything but signs of a strengthening Nina (and I don't mean you).

Thanks, no problem.

 

I personally wouldn't call it "warmer water pushed westward" because that's not really what it is. Rather, the strongest trades have propagated westward towards the dateline in recent weeks, reducing the upwelling rate in the EPAC, hence leading to a warming of the immediate surface SSTs.

 

When trades strengthen again over the EPAC during the second half of September, those warm waters will be obliterated quite quickly, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...