Jump to content

December 2014 Observations for the Pacific Northwest


stuffradio

Recommended Posts

You know what else is funny about that map.. Seeing 80% of the country getting snow. And the puget sound with nada... I know this will not happen like this but I did get a chuckle.. then I panicked a little too.

The Regular GFS snowfall map through 10am Dec 26 looks better for your area. I definitely feel a White Christmas is very possible now, these snowfall maps will definitely be changing.

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014121818/gfs_asnow_nwus_33.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work 8-4 on weekdays but I'm a software engineer, so that means lots of model reading and forum perusing.  B)

I am a web developer and marketing manager so lots of ride time while at work. To busy at night with family to spend to much time on here but do look a little.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why am I not surprised that you know that.

 

 

Pretty sure we all know that... he is almost never on during the day and starts posting in the evening.    Obvious in times when there is lots of activity.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ensembles show a high percentage of tech people.

I am an outlier, my job is not even close to being techy...but I do have an office, desk, a computer, and a view of I-5 so on the days that I am not on the road, I find myself popping over to the forum quite often!

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just can't quite get the thought out of my mind that the top cold waves to ever strike the PNW occurred after a massive AR Event.....

I know Tim doesn't like to hear this, but I agree with you. 1990 really comes to mind among many others.

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Tim doesn't like to hear this, but I agree with you. 1990 really comes to mind among many others.

 

 

I think an immediate connection is certainly possible.

 

Just not 3 months from now.  

 

Obviously AR events are usually caused by a tight thermal gradient with cold air to the north... so it makes sense that sometimes we go from an AR event to arctic air... and sometimes back to another AR event when things shift north again.

 

But an AR event in October does not cause cold in January as some have implied.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes very encouraging considering our first 2 cold events never showed what we're seeing now and the models trended even colder as we neared those events.

 

Jaw dropping!

N. Koreans hacked the 18Z.  But then again, they don't know about the new parallel GFS.  Un-hackable says accuweather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think an immediate connection is certainly possible.

 

Just not 3 months from now.  

 

Obviously AR events are usually caused by a tight thermal gradient with cold air to the north... so it makes sense that sometimes we go from an AR event to arctic air... and sometimes back to another AR event when things shift north again.

 

But an AR event in October does not cause cold in January as some have implied.

I agree with this, but an AR event in mid-late December sure can and has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think an immediate connection is certainly possible.

 

Just not 3 months from now.  

 

Obviously AR events are usually caused by a tight thermal gradient with cold air to the north... so it makes sense that sometimes we go from an AR event to arctic air... and sometimes back to another AR event when things shift north again.

 

But an AR event in October does not cause cold in January as some have implied.

I don't remember seeing anyone saying anything about 3 months out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't remember seeing anyone saying anything about 3 months out.

 

 

Really??

 

Jim has said it many times.   I don't buy it.   Just yesterday he referred to an AR event in the fall of 1861 that led to cold all winter.   

 

I think he is stretching in an attempt to find cause/effect... but so many variables come into play over time.

 

Clearly... this AR event is related to the cold air to the north which is then slated to move south.   

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just can't quite get the thought out of my mind that the top cold waves to ever strike the PNW occurred after a massive AR Event.....

It's not exactly a stretch to figure out why. Most of our strong retrogression events are born of patterns where we have flat west coast ridging with unusually high 500mb with a tight gradient. It's easy to get a good pineapple connection in those situations. October 2003 is an excellent example of this.

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really??

 

Jim has said it many times. I don't buy it. Just yesterday he referred to an AR event in the fall of 1861 that led to cold all winter.

 

I think he is stretching in an attempt to find cause/effect... but so many variables come into play over time.

 

Clearly... this AR event is related to the cold air to the north which is then slated to move south.

That connection I agree is pretty much BS.

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not exactly a stretch to figure out why. Most of our strong retrogression events are born of patterns where we have flat west coast ridging with unusually high 500mb with a tight gradient. It's easy to get a good pineapple connection in those situations. October 2003 is an excellent example of this.

Agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really??

 

Jim has said it many times.   I don't buy it.   Just yesterday he referred to an AR event in the fall of 1861 that led to cold all winter.   

 

I think he is stretching in an attempt to find cause/effect... but so many variables come into play over time.

 

Clearly... this AR event is related to the cold air to the north which is then slated to move south.   

Unless I chose to ignore it? I only remember discussion about AR events to cold air right after, or I just made that the connection on my own subconsciously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virtually every storm season in PNW history, good and bad, has had at least one pineapple express. It's an indication of an active and dynamic weather pattern, not much more.

 

 

Over the entire season... this is exactly correct.   

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle NWS Long Term mentions possibility of cold coming, if the ECMWF verifies.....


-------------------------------------------------------------------


.LONG TERM...THE EXTENDED FORECAST REMAINS CHALLENGING WITH A WIDE RANGE OF SOLUTIONS AMONG THE MODELS. THERE IS SOME AGREEMENT THAT MONDAY WILL GENERALLY FEATURE SHOWERS OR A LULL IN RAINFALL AS HIGHER PRESSURE BUILDS ALOFT. MODELS DO NOT AGREE ON THE STRENGTH OR TRACK OF THE NEXT SYSTEM APPROACHING FROM THE W ON TUESDAY. THE LATEST 12/18Z GFS BRINGS THE LOW IN FURTHER N WHICH WOULD STILL PRODUCE WARM ADVECTION RAINFALL ACROSS THE AREA...THOUGH NOT AS MUCH AS WAS SHOWN BY PREVIOUS SOLUTIONS.



MOST MODELS DIG A COLD UPPER TROUGH SWD OUT OF B.C. THROUGH WRN WA ON WEDNESDAY. THIS COULD USHER IN COOLER AIR BUT MODELS DISAGREE ON THE EXTENT OF RIDGING OFFSHORE AND WHERE IT SETS UP. THE ECMWF CONTINUES TO BE ONE OF THE COLDER SOLUTIONS AND HAS THE KONA LOW CUT OFF FURTHER W...THUS A FURTHER W DEVELOPMENT OF THE UPPER RIDGE. THE KONA LOW IS FURTHER E ON THE GFS40 WITH A RIDGE NEAR 135 140 WHICH WILL STILL USHER IN COOLER NLY FLOW BUT PERHAPS LESS CHANCE OF PRECIPITATION. IT WILL BE INTERESTING TO SEE HOW THIS PANS OUT BUT A SWITCH TO COOLER OR COLD TEMPERATURES IS A POSSIBILITY BY THURSDAY. POPS WERE TRIMMED WAY BACK AND MAY NEED TO BE REMOVED ALTOGETHER IF MODEL TRENDS CONTINUE. SNOW LEVELS WILL ALSO BE MUCH LOWER...POSSIBLY TO SEA LEVEL...BUT IT IS VERY UNCLEAR AS TO HOW MUCH MOISTURE WILL REMAIN BY THAT TIME.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imo this has the most potential for widespread heavy snow since 2008.

That just gives me chills...and a instant flashback to wading through 30+ inches of snow. Starting to drool as I type!

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cfs shows a major arctic outbreak in late January now.

  • Like 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point we have a number of good model runs today.

 

Parallel GFS - excellent 0z and 18z

GFS - excellent 6z and 18z

GEM - good 0z excellent 12z

ECMWF - good 0z OK 12z

  • Like 1

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2023-24 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 1.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 1

Total Hail = 0.0

Total Ice = 0.2

Coldest Low = 13

Lows 32 or below = 50

Highs 32 or below = 3

Lows 20 or below = 3

Highs 40 or below = 9

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...