Jump to content

June 2017 Observations and Model Discussion for the Pacific Northwest


Recommended Posts

Unless our snowfall averages are skewed upward by really big years... then most years would be below normal. Not sure if that is the case.

That is a valid point. Years like '96 would be more above normal than a snowless winter would be below normal.

 

I think the last stretch of above normal snow years in SW BC would be 06/07, 07/08, 08/09.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SEA had already set a daily rainfall record on the evening climate data for today and they have received .53 in the last 6 hours.      Over an inch on the day... the previous daily rainfall record was only .37 

 

Closing in on 1.75 inches here and still dumping. 

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SEA had already set a daily rainfall record on the evening climate data for today and they have received .53 in the last 6 hours. Over an inch on the day... the previous daily rainfall record was only .37

 

Closing in on 1.75 inches here and still dumping.

Why aren't you outside enjoying it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ECMWF looks just like the GFS and GEM for late next week.

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/ecmwf/2017061600/ecmwf_z500aNorm_namer_10.png

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man is it humid or what!  The strong (storm) which isn't really only netted about 0.20 of rain.   Maybe I got rainshadowed or the storm went up north to Washington but it didn't even get windy either.  I can't say for the coast if the high wind advisory wind up being dropped. 

 

It's still 61F and we are in for one of the warmest if not the warmest (night) of the season so far to date.  I hope this isn't a trend and is just a random blip.   Please don't let us go back to 2013 warmth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man is it humid or what! It's still 61F and we are in for one of the warmest if not the warmest (night) of the season so far to date.

Boy it's humid.  The humidity is in the 90s percent range making it feel warmer then it actually is.

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Man is it humid or what! It's still 61F and we are in for one of the warmest if not the warmest (night) of the season so far to date.

Boy it's humid. The humidity is in the 90s percent range making it feel warmer then it actually is.

You have really awful memes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z GFS lost that crazy trapped ULL in the clown range.

 

12Z ECMWF still sort of likes it...

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/ecmwf/2017061612/ecmwf_z500aNorm_namer_9.png

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least you have the recent rock solid consistency of the models on your side.

 

 

On my side?   I have no frickin clue what will happen.   I defer to Phil and then ask questions or point out things as I think appropriate.   Chances are pretty high that Phil will be close.    He is better than any one model.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my side? I have no frickin clue what will happen. I defer to Phil and then ask questions or point out things as I think appropriate. Chances are pretty high that Phil will be close. He is better than any one model.

I didn't really mean anything by that. More a poke at the models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12Z ECMWF still sort of likes it...

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/ecmwf/2017061612/ecmwf_z500aNorm_namer_9.png

It was closer to losing it this time, though. Backed that BC shortwave/ULL westward last minute to produce the phase but that's probably bulls***t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my side? I have no frickin clue what will happen. I defer to Phil and then ask questions or point out things as I think appropriate. Chances are pretty high that Phil will be close. He is better than any one model.

I appreciate the rave review, but I think you might be overestimating my abilities. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The weekly CFSv2 has an outrageous warm bias, which is evident even by week three. From what I can decipher, it's possibly a product of new radiative transfer physics added into the latest version.

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=cfs-avg&region=nhem&pkg=T2maMean&runtime=2017061606&fh=168&xpos=0&ypos=113

 

The 500mb averages are laughable. Completely useless.

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=cfs-avg&region=nhem&pkg=z500aMean&runtime=2017061606&fh=168&xpos=0&ypos=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The weekly CFSv2 has an outrageous warm bias, which is evident even by week three. From what I can decipher, it's possibly a product of new radiative transfer physics added into the latest version.

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=cfs-avg&region=nhem&pkg=T2maMean&runtime=2017061606&fh=168&xpos=0&ypos=113

 

The 500mb averages are laughable. Completely useless.

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=cfs-avg&region=nhem&pkg=z500aMean&runtime=2017061606&fh=168&xpos=0&ypos=1

 

ouch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 here and mostly cloudy.

 

Strange.   You must be too far south.

 

68 at SEA now.

 

Phil... remember when the ECMWF showed the SEA would not get up to 62 until Saturday afternoon?   Its been over 62 on 3 of the 4 days since.  :)

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange. You must be too far south.

 

68 at SEA now.

 

Phil... remember when the ECMWF showed the SEA would not get up to 62 until Saturday afternoon? Its been over 62 on 3 of the 4 days since. :)

That was one run, though. Yesterday was 61 (cooler than ECMWF forecast) and the 12th was 64 (on target). So only half were warmer than forecast by a day out.

 

And the ECMWF's cumulative error score was still lower than the GFS MOS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was one run, though. Yesterday was 61 (cooler than ECMWF forecast) and the 12th was 64 (on target). So only half were warmer than forecast by a day out.

 

And the ECMWF's cumulative error score was still lower than the GFS MOS.

 

 

Yesterday was a wild card with back edge of the rain.   

 

There were several runs which showed only upper 50s and low 60s for most of this week.    We have seen 65, 65, 61, and at least 68 for the Tues-Fri period.   Its been warmer overall than you would think if you were only looking at the ECMWF back on Sunday and Monday for sure.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good example again today... 12Z ECMWF this morning showed a high of 64 at SEA.   Just 12 hours later its 68.   GFS MOS had 68 at SEA today.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday was a wild card with back edge of the rain.

 

There were several runs which showed only upper 50s and low 60s for most of this week. We have seen 65, 65, 61, and at least 68 for the Tues-Fri period. Its been warmer overall than you would think if you were only looking at the ECMWF back on Sunday and Monday for sure.

The GFS MOS kept rain around just as long as the ECMWF last night, and it still busted too warm.

 

Having monitored the ECMWF and GFS MOS over the last six days, while I can confirm the modest cool leanings on the ECMWF (overall), the GFS MOS has demonstrated even larger errors on the warm side, sometimes by up to +6 degrees. The ECMWF never busted by that much during this stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS MOS kept rain around just as long as the ECMWF last night, and it still busted too warm.

Having monitored the ECMWF and GFS MOS over the last six days, while I can confirm the modest cool leanings on the ECMWF (overall), the GFS MOS has demonstrated even larger errors on the warm side, sometimes by up to +6 degrees. The ECMWF never busted by that much during this stretch.

Yes... the GFS MOS has its issues as well. The ECMWF is so good with everything overall and the best with temps elsewhere so my expectations are higher. It clearly overestimates the effect of the Puget Sound.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes... the GFS MOS has its issues as well. The ECMWF is so good with everything overall and the best with temps elsewhere so my expectations are higher. It clearly overestimates the effect of the Puget Sound.

Does it bust warm during the fall/winter months when the sound is relatively warm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it bust warm during the fall/winter months when the sound is relatively warm?

 

I can't remember.   I don't think there are errors more consistently in one direction in the cold season.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the small seasonal streams around here that only run when its really wet in the winter are roaring today. That was some intense rain for 24 hours here.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got up to 98 here in NE Oklahoma today. Heat Index forecast to hit 107 tomorrow...Good lord... This week has been quite a shock to the system. Beautiful sunset tonight...

 

19349432_621933055374_1509142759_o.jpg?o

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...