Jump to content

December 2016 Observations and Model Discussion for the Pacific Northwest


stuffradio

Recommended Posts

Dewpoints are higher on Sunday on the 00Z ECMWF.

 

Around 30 in Seattle and in the low 30s south of there... certainly not the unrealistically low dewpoints that the WRF is showing for that day.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like we lost the EURO. 

  • Like 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Total snow per the 00Z ECMWF. I did not paint this map. It comes from the best model available to us. If you don't want to know what it shows then avert your eyes. The heavier snow south of I-90 is not showing up on this run.

 

ecmwf_tsnow_seattle_9.png

Reminds me of the last two events in December. Not expecting much this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the slow moderating event may be beginning... Another classic and reliable outcome. *sigh*

 

I guess that is what makes January 1950 so special.

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never seen that uber-pixelated map before. Looks uber legit.

 

Light precip with temps above freezing... looks like a very light rain / drizzle situation to me for areas below 500 feet.   Maybe even here as well.    I have been very disappointed about precip type in this situation in the past.  

 

This is on Sunday.   We were just talking about it being sunny with dewpoints in the teens.    Big difference.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SW Oregon should do really well in the snow department at least, everyone from Eugene south looks good.

 

With that kind of blocking ridge nearby (guaranteed at this point), someone is going to score big-time.

 

People still put way too much faith in the models. At least for the important details.

  • Like 1

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Light precip with temps above freezing... looks like a very light rain / drizzle to me for areas below 500 feet.   Maybe even here as well.   

 

This is on Sunday.   We were just talking about it being sunny with dewpoints in the teens.    Big difference.

 

Yeah. Has any other model even shown such a scenario? Just seems like more noise.

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like this "outbreak" is trending more toward January 2007 type stuff, really given that Dec 2016 verified at -10C at SLE, we could lump it in there...Definitely not looking like Dec 2013...Literally 6 hours and it died...On the eve of the event. I'll echo BLI, the models have a long way to go. 

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00Z ECMWF is not great through 120 hours.

 

I hate when cold air intrusions end up being much slower than what the models show originally.

 

Jim was just talking about cold air 'blasting' in here on Saturday night.    That is a significantly incorrect statement now based on the ECMWF.   

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. Has any other model even shown such a scenario? Just seems like more noise.

 

 

ECMWF surface maps are never noise when they are slower, warmer, and wetter than the other models.     Its almost always more correct in that case.   

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00Z ECMWF is not great through 120 hours.

 

I hate when cold air intrusions end up being much slower than what the models show originally.

 

Jim was just talking about cold air 'blasting' in here on Saturday night.    That is a significantly incorrect statement now based on the ECMWF.   

Jim has and will be wrong on that one. It is just not there I just did not want to say that to him earlier due to having him freak out ... Well, that has already happened and he already left so there it is. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having another winter where models actually feel relevant reminds me of how far they still have to go.

 

They've consistently been really piss-poor with a lot of major details even within a few days.

I think if there was more money to be made in more precise models, we'd have them. Until then we are stuck with government run crapola.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00Z ECMWF is not great through 120 hours.

 

I hate when cold air intrusions end up being much slower than what the models show originally.

 

Jim was just talking about cold air 'blasting' in here on Saturday night. That is a significantly incorrect statement now based on the ECMWF.

Reminds me of the last two events we had. Very weak and pathetic arrival of so called arctic air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00Z ECMWF is not great through 120 hours.

 

I hate when cold air intrusions end up being much slower than what the models show originally.

 

Jim was just talking about cold air 'blasting' in here on Saturday night.    That is a significantly incorrect statement now based on the ECMWF.   

 

Yeah, all major models shifted tonight, no denying it. However, earlier runs were definitely showing a much more significant blast of Arctic air than anything seen this year or awhile before. Jim was not out to lunch based on that.

 

A note-for-note repeat of Jan 1950 looking significantly less likely.

 

A major January event? Still very much on the table.

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like this "outbreak" is trending more toward January 2007 type stuff, really given that Dec 2016 verified at -10C at SLE, we could lump it in there...Definitely not looking like Dec 2013...Literally 6 hours and it died...On the eve of the event. I'll echo BLI, the models have a long way to go. 

 

Pathetic.

 

I hyped this cold wave WAY too much today to family and friends.   WAY too much.    I jinxed it.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pathetic.

 

I hyped this cold wave WAY too much today to family and friends.   WAY too much.    I jinxed it.  

 

I have never seen an event fall apart like this at the last minute. We are literally 24 hours away from everything started and the models had shown rock solid consistency until next Thursday/Friday...No reason to think it would fall apart. Then it all did in one model run, every single model shifted, even watering down the first "event." Yeah its better than a lot of recent Januaries, just so disappointing compared to what was being shown, a string of 4-5 sub freezing highs just is not going to happen. 

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...