Jump to content

May Weather in the Pacific Northwest


Recommended Posts

Easy to see why the first trough is pretty dry...second may be wetter with it starting further out over the ocean.

 

 

Almost no rain for SEA and PDX through next Friday morning on the 12Z ECMWF.

 

Waiting for the last 2 days to finish updating.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of crazy how quickly that front washes out. Maybe China can help??

Cold Season 2023/24:

Total snowfall: 26"

Highest daily snowfall: 5"

Deepest snow depth: 12"

Coldest daily high: -20ºF

Coldest daily low: -42ºF

Number of subzero days: 5

Personal Weather Station on Wunderground: 

https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KMTBOZEM152#history

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes... the troughing for the last couple days of May into the first couple days of June is pretty much a given now. I am just starting to look beyond that to see if we go into a long term troughy pattern as Phil as been predicting.

I'm still thinking the first 2 weeks of June will be troughy but I don't like the general theme I see through the first week of June. A lot can still change though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Encouraging to see troughing through day 10 on the 12z Euro. The rainfall amounts it is spitting out are pretty pathetic, though.

 

Quite the southern plains ridge building at day 10. That actually teleconnects well with warm season troughing out here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

August is literally guaranteed a top 5 warm finish every year.

If we keep the -AMM/retracted IO/ATL Hadley Cell regime going this year, then 1995-2017 will be a thing of the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cloud deck starting to break up in Snohomish County. Getting slight breaks at home too.

 

Mercer Island, 350 ft

2021-2022: 11.6", 02/21

2020-2021: 15.6"

2019-2020: ~10"

2018-2019 winter snowfall total: 29.5"

2017-2018: 9.0", 2016-2017: 14.0"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Memorial Day trough trending more progressive/not as hung up has indeed seemed to pave the way for a troughier period, at least in the short to mid-term.

 

It’s a nice feeling to have watched 500mb maps for enough years to start to get a better instinct for this stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes... the troughing for the last couple days of May into the first couple days of June is pretty much a given now. I am just starting to look beyond that to see if we go into a long term troughy pattern as Phil as been predicting.

“Longer term” is subjective. It’s an intraseasonal-scale oscillation in the pattern, not a background state. We’re talking weeks, not months.

 

There isn’t much of a tropical forcing background state this year, despite the recent ridgy stretch (WHEM tropical forcing with the extra-tropical response prolonged by lower frequency poleward +AAM propagation). Future pattern cycles will probably be shorter in duration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12Z EPS is warm again by day 9.

 

12Z ECMWF shows about .01 or .02 over the next 10 days at SEA and PDX.     That is really strange.

 

Even out here it only shows about .20

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12Z EPS is warm again by day 9.

 

12Z ECMWF shows about .01 or .02 over the next 10 days at SEA and PDX. That is really strange.

 

Even out here it only shows about .20

Have you been refreshing the EPS page every few minutes for the past hour?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z EPS is split..about half of the members have a big 500mb trough over the PNW thru D15 with average to below average temperatures, while the other half have a huge western ridge and a deep trough offshore.

 

Though in either case, there would be a re-load.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you been refreshing the EPS page every few minutes for the past hour?

 

Just checked... I wait until 1 p.m.

 

Same warm signal in the 10-15 day period.   Really starts warming up on day 8.

 

eps_t850a_5d_noram_61_2.png

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z EPS is split..about half of the members have a big 500mb trough over the PNW thru D15 with average to below average temperatures, while the other half have a huge western ridge and a deep trough offshore.

 

Though in either case, there would be a re-load.

Thank you for giving information that is actually useful, beyond an orange splattered map. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sun peeks and a breeze while eating lunch on my deck. Oh I so love living 3 minutes from work!

  • Like 1

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z EPS is split..about half of the members have a big 500mb trough over the PNW thru D15 with average to below average temperatures, while the other half have a huge western ridge and a deep trough offshore.

 

Though in either case, there would be a re-load.

The control run is in the warm camp, FWIW.

 

But when you look at how it gets there, you have to be somewhat skeptical. The wavetrain is anchored and retrograding, then it devolves into a chaotic mess despite being in a state of dispersion.

 

There are no examples of such a progression in the 500mb reanalysis for 1948-present, or at least none that I can see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for giving information that is actually useful, beyond an orange splattered map. ;)

 

 

The is the ensemble mean... pretty strong signal there Jesse.  

 

By useful... you mean less stressful for you.    :lol:

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The is the ensemble mean... pretty strong signal there Jesse.

 

By useful... you mean less stressful for you. :lol:

The ensemble mean doesn’t always reflect the ensemble spread, however.

 

You often have cases where a minority of the ensemble members depict an amplified solution, and it skews the mean that way despite the majority of members depicting something different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ensemble mean doesn’t always reflect the ensemble spread, however.

 

You often have cases where a minority of the ensemble members depict an amplified solution, and it skews the mean that way despite the majority of members depicting something different.

 

And yet is been basically correct over the last 6 weeks.

 

There has been just one below normal day at SEA since April 18th... and that was a -1 departure on 4/28.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EPS ensemble mean for that day. I see cold air on there... to our east.

Not sure how well those anomaly maps couple with the actual pattern depicted in that case. Since when would 570dm heights and onshore flow in early June give us 850mb anomalies of 5-10F?

 

That’s why I think the mean heights map is a much better way to go when deciphering the EPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Day 10 500mb mean. Looks like a situation where there is a lot of spread, like Phil mentioned. Not really a strong signal either way.

 

attachicon.gif20CFCDE8-532D-4E07-AF71-966AE6F3697E.png

 

This feels exactly like the rationalization that you accuse me of all the time.   ;)

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how well those maps couple with the actual pattern depicted in that case. Since when would 570dm heights and onshore flow in early June give us 850mb anomalies of 5-10F?

 

That’s why I think the mean heights map is a much better way to go when deciphering the EPS.

 

I disagree.   I think the 850mb temperature mean is very useful as well.   

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And personally speaking, I haven’t been very impressed with the EPS lately.

 

It completely missed this upcoming pattern swing. There was lots of spread, but it had the same issue with the “vocal minority” of super warm/ridgy members skewing the mean in the warm direction.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And personally speaking, I haven’t been very impressed with the EPS lately.

 

It completely missed this upcoming pattern swing. There was lots of spread, but it had the same issue with the “vocal minority” of super warm/ridgy members skewing the mean in the warm direction.

 

I agree.   Its been showing warm for the most part out here for the last 6 weeks.   It has missed all of the cold troughs and cold anomalies we had over that time span.   :D

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...