MR.SNOWMIZER Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 January 1943 was a pretty cold and snowy month, 4 feet is likely an exaggeration but 2 feet isn't.it would be nice to know the facts. Could of been a kitsap hood canal big one. Like feb of 1995 I think. There was 3 feet plus near hood canal at sea level. Quote We come from the land of the ice and snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 It the 12z Euro is correct w/ the wave train/NAO, the PV will be blown to bits, followed by resurgence of the -EPO under a favorable BDC/TF response. If the GFS is correct..well, let's hope it's not.. Quote Live Weather Cam: https://www.youtube.com/live/KxlIo8-KVpc?si=xKLCFYWbZieAfyh6 PWS Wunderground https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62 PWS CWOP/NOAA: https://www.weather.gov/wrh/timeseries?site=F3819&hours=72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvssnow_spokane Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Off topic. Was 1943 a nasty winter around the northwest? A customer came in to my shop friday and he was around 90yrs old. He told me he has lived in port orchard since 1940 so of course I had weather question. I asked what was the deepest snow he had seen in town and without hesitation he said there was 4 ft in 1943!. Said power was out for 2 weeks. Wow imagine if that happened today.Looks pretty cold and snowy... "On January 15, 1943, snow and a cold snap hits Puget Sound and is the worst cold weather in more than 20 years. War production ceases, schools and stores close, and the U.S. Army temporarily lifts restrictions on weather reports. On Friday, January 15, 1943, snow began falling throughout Puget Sound, but what was obvious to residents could not be reported in the media. Wartime restrictions on information prohibited weather reports. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer had some fun with the regulations." link to photos and details: http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&file_id=3623 Quote My Weather Station https://tempestwx.com/station/61434 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Jesus Christ on a Christmas cracker! is anyone else anxious for 00z runs tonight? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Front Ranger Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Some official snowfall totals around the Puget Sound/Hood Canal area in Jan 1943. Shelton: 28.4"Wauna: 19"Cushman Dam: 37.6"Bremerton: 15.9"Vashon Island: 18"Keyport: 18"Sequim: 16"Olympia: 16" Quote A forum for the end of the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bedonbye Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 It the 12z Euro is correct w/ the wave train/NAO, the PV will be blown to bits, followed by resurgence of the -EPO under a favorable BDC/TF response. If the GFS is correct..well, let's hope it's not..do you really think us small people know what the wave train/NAO THE PV , -EPO , BDC/TF IS. YOU THINK THAT YOU ARE SO SMART. lets dummy down a little so that I a common folk can understand your smartness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bedonbye Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 if know one understands what you post. why post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deweydog Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 if know one understands what you post. why postI don't understand this post. 2 Quote My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bedonbye Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 dog dew is correct we don't understand weather phil 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 do you really think us small people know what the wave train/NAO THE PV , -EPO , BDC/TF IS. YOU THINK THAT YOU ARE SO SMART. lets dummy down a little so that I a common folk can understand your smartness. if know one understands what you post. why post I don't understand this post.All of these posts make me more confused than a retarded virgin in a ** house.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 00z GFS 35 minutes00z GEM 1 hours 5 minutes00z ECMWF 3 hours 3 minutes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bedonbye Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 sorry DEWEYDOG I AM lol. I love your since of humar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bedonbye Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 anyone know what it well cost me to view the GFS after Jan. 15 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaya Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 It the 12z Euro is correct w/ the wave train/NAO, the PV will be blown to bits, followed by resurgence of the -EPO under a favorable BDC/TF response. If the GFS is correct..well, let's hope it's not..Please explain. I really don't know what is being said here. Thanks from a professional met! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvssnow_spokane Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Jesus Christ on a Christmas cracker! is anyone else anxious for 00z runs tonight?Nah...*yawn* Quote My Weather Station https://tempestwx.com/station/61434 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Please explain. I really don't know what is being said here. Thanks from a professional met!I agree. Break things down a bit more, Phil..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Swamp Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 do you really think us small people know what the wave train/NAO THE PV , -EPO , BDC/TF IS. YOU THINK THAT YOU ARE SO SMART. lets dummy down a little so that I a common folk can understand your smartness.How them wind charts look out to 364 hours? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wx_statman Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Off topic. Was 1943 a nasty winter around the northwest? A customer came in to my shop friday and he was around 90yrs old. He told me he has lived in port orchard since 1940 so of course I had weather question. I asked what was the deepest snow he had seen in town and without hesitation he said there was 4 ft in 1943!. Said power was out for 2 weeks. Wow imagine if that happened today.That was a great stretch for the PNW in January 1943. Single day snowfalls of 14.4" at PDX and 10.0" at Newport still stand as all time records. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 How them wind charts look out to 364 hours?Briskerly and variable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FroYoBro Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 sorry DEWEYDOG I AM lol. I love your since of humar I have nothing to say. Just wanted to quote this. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHweatherChris Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 If the 00Z goes arctic like the 12Z, then we have something to kinda get turned on by. However, I would love to see something really good inside 192 hours as a start. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 00z GFS has begunWe need a $ money run delivering the goods. Cautiously optimistic, but not confident based on little Ensemble support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 If the 00Z goes arctic like the 12Z, then we have something to kinda get turned on by. However, I would love to see something really good inside 192 hours.Yeah, agreed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 HR 48 Op http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014122100/gfs_z500_mslp_namer_9.png Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 HR 60 and I'm only posting this frame to show the much stronger low west of Juneau undergoing strong cyclogenesis. http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014122100/gfs_z500_mslp_namer_11.png Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHweatherChris Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 HR 60 and I'm only posting this frame to show the much stronger low west of Juneau undergoing strong cyclogenesis. http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014122100/gfs_z500_mslp_namer_11.pngStill amazing that the 1002 low south of the Great Lakes may bomb out into the 960's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bedonbye Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 How them wind charts look out to 364 hours?like your ugly face Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 HR 60 Parallel, interestingly is not as deep with that low, nor the Kamchatka storm http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfsp/2014122100/gfsp_z500_mslp_namer_11.png Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 HR 84 Op http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014122100/gfs_z500_mslp_namer_15.png Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 At HR 90 Kamchatka low bombs towards 950mb, but holds back in the western Bering Sea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Stupid question time! If 00z (Midnight "Zulu," or Greenwich Mean Time) is 4:00 p.m. PST, then why do the "00z" models come out at 7:35, 8:05, and 10:00 p.m. PST? Does the term "00z" refer to when the data starts being processed as opposed to when the model runs are actually released? ThanksIt's not a stupid question, but I wish I could better answer it. It makes sense what you're saying that model data initialization begins at 4 PM. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TT-SEA Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Stupid question time! If 00z (Midnight "Zulu," or Greenwich Mean Time) is 4:00 p.m. PST, then why do the "00z" models come out at 7:35, 8:05, and 10:00 p.m. PST? Does the term "00z" refer to when the data starts being processed as opposed to when the model runs are actually released? Thanks It refers to the data initialization time. Quote **REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 HR 120 http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014122100/gfs_z500_mslp_namer_21.png Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poulsbo Snowman Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 I am guessing the data is created at 00Z. The data has to be sent to other computers for the model runs--and that takes time. That's my cut on it--but I'm not sure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHweatherChris Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Ah ha! And then perhaps it takes the NWS several additional hours to analyze the model outputs, which is why the forecast which incorporates the 00z models doesn't come out until around 3 a.m. PST (only one hour before the next model run begins at 12z)? I've always wondered why the times don't seem to match up better.And Poulsbo Snowman has a good take on it as well, initialization is the start point of data, the outcome being outputted takes time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bedonbye Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 I went skiing today at white pass. lots of bumps do to lack of snow. I took my old skies and they took a beaten do too lack of snow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHweatherChris Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 Kamchatka low is stronger at hr 138. Edit: It is really starting to look like the Kamchatka low is the real driver on the upcoming pattern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 HR 150 http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014122100/gfs_z500_mslp_namer_26.png Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 do you really think us small people know what the wave train/NAO THE PV , -EPO , BDC/TF IS. YOU THINK THAT YOU ARE SO SMART. lets dummy down a little so that I a common folk can understand your smartness.Cool it, seriously. This stuff is pretty basic. Quote Live Weather Cam: https://www.youtube.com/live/KxlIo8-KVpc?si=xKLCFYWbZieAfyh6 PWS Wunderground https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KMDBETHE62 PWS CWOP/NOAA: https://www.weather.gov/wrh/timeseries?site=F3819&hours=72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradient Keeper Posted December 21, 2014 Report Share Posted December 21, 2014 http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014122100/gfs_z500a_namer_26.png Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.