Jump to content

January Weather In The PNW 2024 (Part III) - The Warming Shot


iFred

Recommended Posts

30 at EUG. It's coming. 

  • Like 3
  • Weenie 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Front Ranger said:

Already 3 below nws forecast from this afternoon. 

The hourly point and click? Those are always oversmoothed, missing the quick drops due to wetbulbing/decoupling and subsequent rises from BL mixing/etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, North_County said:

Side note, but does anyone else call a freezing rain event a "silver thaw"? Or is that just a local colloquialism? Growing up, that's what I always heard it referred to as. But I don't think I've ever heard that phrase from anyone outside of Whatcom County. 🤷‍♂️

Never heard that term in my life.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

Also crazy... the latest HRRR run has the precip mostly done by noon or 1 tomorrow.   

hrrr-or_wa-precip_1hr_inch-5525200.png

I get so frustrated with that model. Can’t think of a situation where it does its job. Pretty sad given this scenario is exactly what it should be good for. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, luvssnow_spokane said:

GREAT READ: With Puget Sound Energy’s (PSE) recent debacle, Cliff Mass, a professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Washington, takes climate zealots to task in a blog post titled: The Cold Truth About Renewable Energy in the Pacific Northwest.

https://x.com/wagop/status/1747383497302622434?s=46&t=dIP_tfaU13ExwPgv5KMjSw

get out here with that garbage, captain horsepaste

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Slushy Inch said:

Thats south! Hard to imagine center getting to Olympic Penninsula 

Exactly.    Makes no sense.

This is what 18Z ECMWF showed,

ecmwf-deterministic-nw-mslp-1705428000-1705428000-1705536000-10.gif

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, North_County said:

Side note, but does anyone else call a freezing rain event a "silver thaw"? Or is that just a local colloquialism? Growing up, that's what I always heard it referred to as. But I don't think I've ever heard that phrase from anyone outside of Whatcom County. 🤷‍♂️

I once had a step-daddy, he was about one of oh say five of 'em. He came from Idaho, back where they grow taters n stuff and he once told me, "Boy, once you see that silver thaw of the freezin' rain, then you know it be spring comin' upon us soon." 

That's when I knew, we would get ZR tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SnowWillarrive said:

No way that’s going to move far north unless it teleports. 

Particularly because its currently headed due east at a good clip.

  • Like 3

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TT-SEA said:

Particularly because it’s currently headed due east as good clip.

It’s hard to imagine the euro and the other models being so wrong though. Like the low just falls apart and shifts north? Would be a really interesting scenario for the models to pick up on such a complicated scenario perfectly. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the heaviest part of the band is over the I-90 corridor now moving rapidly north... radar echoes to the south are weaker and sort of falling apart.   I thought it was going start around 9 here and go until 2 a.m. 

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

Exactly.    Makes no sense.

This is what 18Z ECMWF showed,

ecmwf-deterministic-nw-mslp-1705428000-1705428000-1705536000-10.gif

The surface low isn’t necessarily going to be aligned with the mid-level low as viewed via visual/IR.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Phil said:

The surface low isn’t necessarily going to be aligned with the mid-level low as viewed via visual/IR.

Thanks... its so confusing.  

  • Like 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in NWS Spokane's latest AFD (not sure how this plays out but will be cool to see it play out, if it does)

 

A strong winter storm will impact the Inland NW as an upper low
dropping down along the British Columbia coast combines with a 
low moving in up from the southwest.
 The low approaching from the 
southwest will send a warm front across the region tonight into 
Wednesday with snow starting in Central and SE Washington between 
9 PM-Midnight, reaching reaching NE Washington and the North Idaho
Panhandle between midnight-2 am. Will be adjusted the start time
for some of the advisories and warnings to start a few hours
later. This will be round one of snow, with a brief letup in the 
snow intensity by mid- morning. The low approaching from the 
southwest then gets picked up by the trough dropping down from 
British Columbia during the day on Wednesday bringing increased 
atmospheric lift over the region. The surface low shifts east into
the Puget Sound area Wednesday afternoon and then tracking to 
over the Palouse area Wednesday evening
.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also ignore the “L” symbol on those WxBell graphs, it’s next to meaningless as these mid latitude lows have multiple small scale pressure minimas, and the “L” only indicates where the lowest minima is. It will jump all over the place.

In miller-B nor’easter that L symbol “teleports” to the coast all the time as that portion of the storm intensifies. It’s often referred to as the “transfer” to the coast, but that’s actually not what’s happening at all.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Phil said:

The surface low isn’t necessarily going to be aligned with the mid-level low as viewed via visual/IR.

yep, I don't think it becomes vertically stacked until it gets east of the cascades

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...