Jump to content

December 2016 Observations and Model Discussion for the Pacific Northwest


stuffradio

Recommended Posts

Lol, compact vort right over Alaska. Sometimesdylan will like this run.

I'm on the fence. I'm okay with it just being cold/dry/windy so I can bust out the ice climbing tools, but if it is snowy I would be able to get my skiing/snowmobiling fix.

 

Just anything but 45 degrees and raining is what I'm rooting for. 

"There are so many waves coming in all the time, you don't have to worry about that. Take your time—wave come. Let the other guys go; catch another one." -Duke Kahanamoku

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm on the fence. I'm okay with it just being cold/dry/windy so I can bust out the ice climbing tools, but if it is snowy I would be able to get my skiing/snowmobiling fix.

 

Just anything but 45 degrees and raining is what I'm rooting for.

45 and rain?

 

Sounds chilly.

  • Like 1

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 and rain?

 

Sounds chilly.

Our ski area elevation is 1200-2600 ft. If it's 45 and raining it's mostly all below snow line. :(

 

Makes me have to go to Haines to get my skiing fix, but I'm in the middle of finals so that won't be a go for two weeks.

"There are so many waves coming in all the time, you don't have to worry about that. Take your time—wave come. Let the other guys go; catch another one." -Duke Kahanamoku

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In your opinion, what is the likelihood we switch back to a west coast ridge for December?

I'm predicting another EPO tank and subsequent Arctic blast into the US around the Holidays, however I'm not sure where/how it'll unload, so that period could either feature a western ridge or a deep trough depending on where the waves set up.

 

I'm more confident in a warmer pattern during early/mid January, with a colder pattern following from late January into February following a SSW/PV break-up, which should take place during the second half of January.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are good. Pretty close pattern evolution overall to the operational, nothing like the 18z GFS.

I'm not sure I'd take it that far. They definitely trended more progressive, especially in the d11-15 range, but they're still worlds better-looking than the GFS/GEFS et al.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I'd take it that far. They definitely trended more progressive, especially in the d11-15 range, but they're still worlds better-looking than the GFS/GEFS et al.

 

Just talking through day 10. They are pretty darn similar with the pattern to the operational. At least the mean is.

 

EDIT: Comparing the ensemble mean from the 0z Euro to the 12z, the 12z ensembles were actually less progressive through day 10.

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just slight differences between the Euro/GFS ensemble means at day 6.

 

euro.gif

 

gfs.gif

I think you have mismatched timestamps there. There's a difference but it's not as stark as that map depicts, and certainly not extraordinary for d6..

 

EPS mean:

 

http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww243/phillywillie/Mobile%20Uploads/F56DDFC5-1D46-4F6A-B814-17A44DEE0847_zpsua6kuodd.png

 

GEFS mean:

 

http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww243/phillywillie/Mobile%20Uploads/BE7CAF8B-FE69-497A-9E17-7C18921231EF_zpsscpeexft.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil, the 12z Euro was run about 3 hours before the 18z GFS, right? So why are you comparing hour 144 of the Euro ensembles to hour 156 of the GFES? That's 15 hours later from model initiation.

That just brings them closer (12z to 12z). Your images are 24hrs apart..maybe clear your cache?

 

http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww243/phillywillie/Mobile%20Uploads/0FCFAF14-F62B-4707-806E-38B002B2B18A_zpshrh9cdyt.png

 

http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww243/phillywillie/Mobile%20Uploads/F56DDFC5-1D46-4F6A-B814-17A44DEE0847_zpsua6kuodd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have mismatched timestamps there. There's a difference but it's not as stark as that map depicts, and certainly not extraordinary for d6..

 

 

 

Your timestamps are off and that is still a rather significant difference...

Cold Season 2023/24:

Total snowfall: 26"

Highest daily snowfall: 5"

Deepest snow depth: 12"

Coldest daily high: -20ºF

Coldest daily low: -42ºF

Number of subzero days: 5

Personal Weather Station on Wunderground: 

https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KMTBOZEM152#history

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your timestamps are off and that is still a rather significant difference...

Fat thumbs + smartphone. See the corrected comparison above..not a huge difference at all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just slight differences between the Euro/GFS ensemble means at day 6.

 

 

euro.gif

 

gfs.gif

 

 

These images are a full 24hrs apart. One is on the 7th, the other on the 6th. There's your difference. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fat thumbs + smartphone. See the corrected comparison above..not a huge difference at all.

 

Somewhat subtle in the upper air patterns but of course much bigger changes on a surface level.

 

I guess the point is that the 12z EPS mean is almost identical as the ECMWF operational.

  • Like 1

Cold Season 2023/24:

Total snowfall: 26"

Highest daily snowfall: 5"

Deepest snow depth: 12"

Coldest daily high: -20ºF

Coldest daily low: -42ºF

Number of subzero days: 5

Personal Weather Station on Wunderground: 

https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KMTBOZEM152#history

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the progressive pattern shown on the GFS develops it will certainly shove the cold air out very quickly...

Like in early January 2004 where the progressive pattern said rain and above freezing temperatures but several days later we were still below freezing that left all the meteorologists stunned? I think the GFS starting with the upcoming 00z run tonight will start to trend towards what the 12Z KING EURO showed.

  • Like 1

f3e7e3bf2f29b1e9cdb92d7e39e709f1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi well I hope as we approach the magical timeframe, the models come into better alignment with SNOW.  And more cold shots to follow.  We are so overdue for a cold snowy winter, but yes, all components must fall into place first.  Very tough to predict this in the PNW mountainous climate.  The ocean is the biggest player that dominates our weather and constantly wants to moderate any cold air.  So i am cheering for the block and huge stationary trough dominating to our East.  Lets go SNOW.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like in early January 2004 where the progressive pattern said rain and above freezing temperatures but several days later we were still below freezing that left all the meteorologists stunned? I think the GFS starting with the upcoming 00z run tonight will start to trend towards what the 12Z KING EURO showed.

I could be wrong but I would think that the models would have improved in technology just a little bit since 2004.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are still days away from the details and direction of the models.  Wow you sure ride the models here guys.  Don't stress so much not worth it man

You must be new here  :lol:

  • Like 3

"There are so many waves coming in all the time, you don't have to worry about that. Take your time—wave come. Let the other guys go; catch another one." -Duke Kahanamoku

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks very climo..

Cold front passes through and maybe a slight transition with some light snow in isolated areas...otherwise dry.  Then the outflow dries everything up for a couple of days.  Typical warmer transition to rain from the SW to piss us all off coming Thursday.   :angry:  :angry: 

Seen it all before.  Hoping for the best but being reasonable at the same time too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These images are a full 24hrs apart. One is on the 7th, the other on the 6th. There's your difference. ;)

 

Wasn't a cache issue, and just because one said the 6th and one said the 7th doesn't make them 24 hrs apart. I think just a time stamp issue on the map. The 144 hour ensemble mean for the 18z GFS should only be 3 hours behind 144 hr for 12z Euro, right?

 

Either way, you can see the general progression of the ensemble mean for both models is quite different. Much like the operationals were quite different.

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't a cache issue, and just because one said the 6th and one said the 7th doesn't make them 24 hrs apart. I think just a time stamp issue on the map. The 144 hour ensemble mean for the 18z GFS should only be 3 hours behind 144 hr for 12z Euro, right?

 

Either way, you can see the general progression of the ensemble mean for both models is quite different. Much like the operationals were quite different.

Just because the Euro was 3 hours late being released shouldn't push the run itself back though. I'd think hour 0 would still be 12z.

Everett Snowfall (510 feet elevation)

Snow since February 2019: 91"

2023-24: 6"

2022-23: 17.5"

2021-22: 17.75"

2020-21: 14.5”

2019-20: 10.5"

2018-19: 24.75"

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I knew KING EURO has trended colder but I had to check for myself. I looked at the last 3 12z KING EURO runs from Tuesday to today. They have gotten progressively colder each run for Wednesday at 4am. Here is what they were showing for YVR, SEA and PDX each of those runs. I have never seen anything like this before.

 

YVR- 11/29: -8C

         11/30: -9C

         12/01: -10C

 

SEA- 11/29: -7C

         11/30: -8C

         12/01: -9C

 

PDX- 11/29: -5C

         11/30: -6C

         12/01: -9C

 

http://maps1.pivotalweather.com/maps/models/ecmwf/2016112912/192/850tw.conus.pnghttp://maps1.pivotalweather.com/maps/models/ecmwf/2016113012/168/850tw.conus.pnghttp://maps1.pivotalweather.com/maps/models/ecmwf/2016120112/144/850tw.conus.png

f3e7e3bf2f29b1e9cdb92d7e39e709f1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...