Jump to content

October 2016 Observations and Model Discussion for the Pacific Northwest


TT-SEA

Recommended Posts

Still lots of uncertainty on how this Sou'wester will form and track up the coastline. Expect more model flip flopping as we get inside a day out and even then we will need to rely on the GOLU model because these Sou'Wester's sometimes veer off course. A slight shift here and there will make all the difference in the World.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if anybody has heard of this model but it's the MF-ARPEGE. It was on the meteocentre.com website. Basically it's the France Model. Here is it's newest 12z run. The wind gusts are insane.

 

http://img.meteocentre.com/models/arpege_amer_12/WGE_PN_054_0000.gif

http://img.meteocentre.com/models/arpege_amer_12/WGE_PN_060_0000.gif

http://img.meteocentre.com/models/arpege_amer_12/WGE_PN_066_0000.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott Sistek on Twitter: 12Z both GFS and Euro now converging on the severe Saturday wind storm scenario. :( In KOMO planning meeting now. Will tweet more soon.

 

Sounds like NWS/media outlets starting to lean towards Puget Sound-focused scenario.

I am selfish but  BRING IT!!  ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott Sistek on Twitter: 12Z both GFS and Euro now converging on the severe Saturday wind storm scenario. :( In KOMO planning meeting now. Will tweet more soon.

 

Sounds like NWS/media outlets starting to lean towards Puget Sound-focused scenario.

 

It's a fair guess at this point. I'd say Puget sound is likely to see some of the strongest wind gusts in a few years for sure. I think Vancouver, BC and Portland are more likely to have a dud storm given they're on the periphery of the current trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Winterdog

I am selfish but  BRING IT!!  ;)

Even though I do share a fascination with all of you about the coming storm I have to admit I am not looking forward to the hardship and discomfort it may bring. Days without power, cooking on the barbecue, no internet, heating with the wood stove, stumbling around in darkness etc. are not enjoyable. Instead, give me an arctic front with plummeting temperatures and blowing snow. There is a beauty with the snow that makes the hardships blend with the aesthetics of a smoothed and freshened landscape as opposed to the damp, dark, and broken sweep after a major wind storm. I pray there is no loss of life resulting from this reckless visitor.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.08" at PDX now. 

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though I do share a fascination with all of you about the coming storm I have to admit I am not looking forward to the hardship and discomfort it may bring. Days without power, cooking on the barbecue, no internet, heating with the wood stove, stumbling around in darkness etc. are not enjoyable. Instead, give me an arctic front with plummeting temperatures and blowing snow. There is a beauty with the snow that makes the hardships blend with the aesthetics of a smoothed and freshened landscape as opposed to the damp, dark, and broken sweep after a major wind storm. I pray there is no loss of life resulting from this reckless visitor.

 

That is totally understandable. I'm pretty fortunate because I live in an area that is usually very quick at restoring power. I can't think of a time in my life where the power was out for more than 18 hours or so (that includes when I lived in more rural areas than I do now). But I could definitely see it becoming a drag after a day or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though I do share a fascination with all of you about the coming storm I have to admit I am not looking forward to the hardship and discomfort it may bring. Days without power, cooking on the barbecue, no internet, heating with the wood stove, stumbling around in darkness etc. are not enjoyable. Instead, give me an arctic front with plummeting temperatures and blowing snow. There is a beauty with the snow that makes the hardships blend with the aesthetics of a smoothed and freshened landscape as opposed to the damp, dark, and broken sweep after a major wind storm. I pray there is no loss of life resulting from this reckless visitor.

 

 

I totally agree.   It is what it is... but I am not looking forward to it at all.   

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Sounder

Should I start boarding up my windows??? Why aren't there evacuation warnings??? What will the storm surge be like in downtown??? I'm moving my gas BBQ inside my studio for warmth when the power goes out. How long will it take the National Guard to get into the disaster zone next week???

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're probably right and this is a nonevent for everyone. No need to panic or prepare, just a normal breezy wet day.

 

I definitely don't agree that it will be a nonevent for everyone. 55-65 mph gusts are nothing to sneeze at in my opinion. I don't think it's fair to say that it will be a "normal", "breezy" day. We haven't had a storm like this in a few years. Especially with the trees having their canopy, power outages will be likely for a lot of areas. I'd also say that having water jugs would be prudent, especially given the high rainfall... reservoir water could become contaminated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though I do share a fascination with all of you about the coming storm I have to admit I am not looking forward to the hardship and discomfort it may bring. Days without power, cooking on the barbecue, no internet, heating with the wood stove, stumbling around in darkness etc. are not enjoyable. Instead, give me an arctic front with plummeting temperatures and blowing snow. There is a beauty with the snow that makes the hardships blend with the aesthetics of a smoothed and freshened landscape as opposed to the damp, dark, and broken sweep after a major wind storm. I pray there is no loss of life resulting from this reckless visitor.

I agree I would take a major arctic intrusion with snow over wind but since we are still a month away from that being an option I am greatly looking forward to this possible major event!
  • Like 1

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Often things start looking a lot different once cyclogenesis starts taking shape. Seems common up here, for something that looks like a direct hit, ends up turning towards northern Vancouver island in the last 24hrs.

 

I think what makes forecasting so difficult for the PNW, aside from the topographical elements, is the lack of sampling before a system comes onshore. For example, forecasting for a winter storm out east becomes a lot easier once the system makes landfall in the west, because the system has so many stations monitoring its behaviour -- as a result, models tend to converge on a solution. But for the PNW, you've got a system out in the ocean with very sparse buoy data. It's very difficult to model a system with such limited data. It's mainly why I tend to be more conservative when forecasting for events in the PNW in the medium range.

 

We are entering the short range forecast now, with 48 hours until Songda strikes... this is when the modelling gets really interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Climatology takes over most of the time with these storms.  It's truly the exception that we get smacked. Not unlike snow storms and arctic outbreaks. Climo.   Time and time again these storms spin up, bomb and make a beeline north.  It's just what they do.  It looked like it had a chance to nail the Portland area but I never felt it would just because of climo as much as the models (some of the models) said it would hit near here somewhere.  If it were within maybe 12-18 hrs and it looked like a lock then I'd jump on the band wagon.  It will still and can possibly get pretty windy here in the N. Willamette Valley but it probably (at least at this point in time) won't be one to write home about.  Now watch it make an idiot out of me.  I won't be upset if I'm wrong and I loose power for a few days.  I like windstorms!  I don't like seeing people having to deal with the stress of property damage or worse either.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NWS Curse strikes again!

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truly big story is all the rain!

 

http://www.cascadeaccess.com/~mnelsen/RPM_RAIN_NWOREGON.jpg

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what makes forecasting so difficult for the PNW, aside from the topographical elements, is the lack of sampling before a system comes onshore. For example, forecasting for a winter storm out east becomes a lot easier once the system makes landfall in the west, because the system has so many stations monitoring its behaviour -- as a result, models tend to converge on a solution. But for the PNW, you've got a system out in the ocean with very sparse buoy data. It's very difficult to model a system with such limited data. It's mainly why I tend to be more conservative when forecasting for events in the PNW in the medium range.

 

We are entering the short range forecast now, with 48 hours until Songda strikes... this is when the modelling gets really interesting.

The vast majority of data assimilated into the modeling is satellite derived. There are dozens of radiosonde launch sites upstream/over the Pacific, and when you get down to it, the real error differential between the NPAC/west coast and NATL/east coast is statistically insignificant.

 

An error in one domain will correspond to an error in another domain, which will correspond to an error in another domain, so on. So in the end, you're dealing with the inescapable void of chaos (blah blah, can't measure the speed and location of a particle simultaneously, blah blah).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Bettes on the Weather channel just said that Saturday's system could be worse than CDS in 1962

 

Whaaaaaaa

 

What model suites is he looking at?

Wow huge hype and from the East Coast...the media madness has begun!

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18z GFS looks to be about the same strength/track as 12z. 973mb off coast of Olympic Peninsula, 980mb up near Vancouver.

 

18Z GFS tightens the gradient on the south end, shifting the impacts a tad north but increasing the strength on the southern side of the low. Astoria to Olympia really gets hit incredibly hard on this run...  We're talking 70+ mph gusts

 

GFS does continue to ease off on Portland... still a good wind storm there but nothing devastating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Bettes on the Weather channel just said that Saturday's system could be worse than CDS in 1962

 

Whaaaaaaa

 

What model suites is he looking at?

Ratings trump common sense. Always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inauguration Day storm starting to look like it might be a decent analog, although that one took a more inland track.

 

That storm certainly raped and assaulted the area, didn't just talk about it.

I had trees falling in front of me while trying to get home from school via my new to me Chevy ElCamino during that storm! Was such fun!!

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inauguration Day storm starting to look like it might be a decent analog, although that one took a more inland track.

 

That storm certainly raped and assaulted the area, didn't just talk about it.

Yeah that was a doozy.. over 600,000 without power at the high point with that one. This one is in the realm of possibilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking Hannukah Eve storm in '06 is another good analog to look at, in conjunction with Inauguration Day storm.

 

Although, the Hannukah Eve storm came in more due-west and was a tad stronger (957mb) but still relatively similar to this one.

 

 

Trajectory on the 2006 storm made a big difference for my area.   That was a perfect track and strength to hit this area.

 

A storm moving northward along the coast is going to hit areas near the Sound much harder than out here.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...