Gorgeous sunset from Mt Tabor park. Lots of big, downed trees on the north and east side of the park from our ARCTIC WINDS three weeks ago. But honestly the damage wasn’t quite as bad as I feared. I guess the historic shelter took a pretty good hit but that part of the park was cordoned off.
I was intrigued so I looked up the average high and low temperatures across WA for August of 1899. Olga's average low of 45F is pretty impressive as it's about 4 degrees colder than anything we've seen in the last 50 years. The fact it's so much colder than every other location on the west side does make me wonder if there was an error with the thermometer at that time or maybe it was just incredible cold winds blowing off the straight.
The Seattle average high for the month was almost 10 d
I guess Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton must have also been fascists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judeo-Christian_ethics
By the 1980s and 1990s, favorable references to "Judeo-Christian values" were common, and the term was used by conservative Christians.[29]
President Ronald Reagan frequently emphasized Judeo-Christian values as necessary ingredients in the fight against Communism. He argued that the Bible contains "all the answers to the problems that face us."[30] Reagan disapproved of the growth of secularism and emphasized the need to take the idea of sin seriously.[31] Tom Freiling, a Christian publisher and head of a conservative PAC, stated in his 2003 book, Reagan's God and Country, that "Reagan's core religious beliefs were always steeped in traditional Judeo-Christian heritage."[32] Religion—and the Judeo-Christian concept—was a major theme in Reagan's rhetoric by 1980.[33]
President Bill Clinton during his 1992 presidential campaign, likewise emphasized the role of religion in society, and in his personal life, having made references to the Judeo-Christian tradition
In the first case, I guess we have one statement contradicting the other. Or maybe just the begging of a question as to exactly what the (unstated) “general principles of Christianity” are.
In the second case, there is a difference between mentioning a “Creator” and the Christian Deity. Plus the fact that said Deity is also worshipped as such by some non-Christian religions. So no implication of Christianity there.
Plus, the Declaration of Independence is (unlike a ratified treaty) a document with exactly no legal standing.
Recommended Posts
Posted by Cascadia_Wx,
18 reactions
Go to this post
Posted by Skagit Weather,
4 reactions
Go to this post
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.