Jump to content

June 2016 Observation and Model Discussion for the Pacific Northwest


Recommended Posts

The model updates are back!

 

Always a good sign that things are trending towards possibly appearing to trend less troughy.

 

I report both sides all the time.   For some reason you like the posts about troughs and mock me if I mention anything else.   :lol:

 

I didn't even post a map tonight.  

 

I think we have mentioned about 5 million times what our preferences are here.   I would actually prefer an alternating trough/ridge pattern right now rather than 10 days straight of each.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I report both sides all the time. For some reason you like the posts about troughs and mock me if I mention anything else. :lol:

 

I didn't even post a map tonight.

You've been almost completely mum about the models the past 2-3 days during a stretch of troughy runs.

 

Relative to the map posting frenzy last week that was occurring during the period where the current pattern was coming into focus and you were obviously pulling hard for it not even to happen at all, it has been a noticeable drop off.

 

Just an observation. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've been almost completely mum about the models the past 2-3 days during a stretch of troughy runs.

 

Relative to the map posting frenzy last week that was occurring during the period where the current pattern was coming into focus and you were obviously pulling hard for it not even to happen at all, it has been a noticeable drop off.

 

Just an observation. :)

 

 

Thanks for the observation!     So what.

 

Like I said... was hoping for some middle ground.   Still am.   It will come.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough. As long as you own it and don't try to come off as Mr. Objectivity.

 

 

Likewise.

 

Like it or not... there is a strong signal for a JAS period that we will both love.   Not sure what the hell we are going to talk about then??

 

Maybe the snowy January that is coming up?    :)

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Likewise.

 

Like it or not... there is a strong signal for a JAS period that we will both love.   Not sure what the hell we are going to talk about then??

 

Maybe the snowy January that is coming up?    :)

 

:lol:

 

January 1989 was not very snowy, by the way...

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

January 1989 was not very snowy, by the way...

 

 

January 1890 goofball.    And then you have February of 1989.   Delayed but not denied!  

 

And we would both be very happy with a normal summer.    That is true.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These rain showers are sure moving quickly. A heavy band formed just offshore and rapidly blew through/dissipated before it could drop any measurable precipitation. Looks like a similar story further south too. There's definitely a fair amount of instability out there but we're still just dealing with smaller scattered popup showers. It would be nice to see some organized bands develop and maintain their strength for awhile tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got placed on mod preview over at the accuwx forums for disagreeing with jdrenken (@TriStatesWx) regarding the PDO. I stated that the PDO simply reflects the upper level patterns, not drives them. He linked a paper stating that the East Pac/West Coast ridge was "anchored" in place by the notorious "blob", in which I disagreed. Claims I attacked a peer reviewed paper :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got placed on mod preview over at the accuwx forums for disagreeing with jdrenken (@TriStatesWx) regarding the PDO. I stated that the PDO simply reflects the upper level patterns, not drives them. He linked a paper stating that the East Pac/West Coast ridge was "anchored" in place by the notorious "blob", in which I disagreed. Claims I attacked a peer reviewed paper :D

The PDO and the third runway should be on mod preview.

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got placed on mod preview over at the accuwx forums for disagreeing with jdrenken (@TriStatesWx) regarding the PDO. I stated that the PDO simply reflects the upper level patterns, not drives them. He linked a paper stating that the East Pac/West Coast ridge was "anchored" in place by the notorious "blob", in which I disagreed. Claims I attacked a peer reviewed paper :D

 

Blob and PDO aren't the same thing, anyway. What kind of peers are reviewing these papers?

  • Like 1

A forum for the end of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blob and PDO aren't the same thing, anyway. What kind of peers are reviewing these papers?

Ones that we desperately want to become members here so all the distracting frivolity will stop and more substantive conversation can take place.

  • Like 1

My preferences can beat up your preferences’ dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like there are less warm members in the long range on the 06z ensembles.attachicon.gifimage.png

 

 

12Z ensembles are warmer.   

 

Still think that by next weekend this very troughy pattern will fade.    Probably warm but not hot.   All the models seem to be moving in that direction.

 

Hoping everyone gets in on the rain action in the next week before the dry season really gets going.

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12Z ensembles are warmer.   

 

Still think that by next weekend this very troughy pattern will fade.    Probably warm but not hot.   All the models seem to be moving in that direction.

 

Hoping everyone gets in on the rain action in the next week before the dry season really gets going.

 

12Z Euro keeps some sort of troughiness over us through day 10.

 

Obviously really deep troughing like today's and next week's gets harder to do as we move later into June. A gradual relaxation of troughing is to be expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12Z ensembles are warmer.

 

Still think that by next weekend this very troughy pattern will fade. Probably warm but not hot. All the models seem to be moving in that direction.

 

Hoping everyone gets in on the rain action in the next week before the dry season really gets going.

Just typical intraseasonal wavefield fluctuations.

 

Heights will rise into AK/far NPAC following the secession of EPAC/WHEM forcing next week, so the anomalously deep troughing (locally) will relax for a few weeks. It's temporary, however, and it will reinitiate.

 

There will probably be a further consolidation of EHEM/Niña forcing and -AAM/-PNA in July, so not only will toughing return, but it'll probably be more "anomalous" than the upcoming period, relatively speaking.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12Z Euro keeps some sort of troughiness over us through day 10.

 

Obviously really deep troughing like today's and next week's gets harder to do as we move later into June. A gradual relaxation of troughing is to be expected.

 

 

 

Yes.   The troughing seems to just dissolve later next week.    

 

Looking over 500mb patterns for so many periods in June in history as I have done in the past... that seems to be the most likely evolution as well.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just typical intraseasonal wavefield fluctuations.

 

Heights will rise into AK/far NPAC following the secession of EPAC/WHEM forcing next week, so the deep troughing (locally) will relax for a few weeks. It's temporary.

 

There will probably be a further consolidation of EHEM/Niña forcing and -AAM/-PNA in July, so troughing will return, probably to a more "anomalous" extent than the upcoming period, actually.

 

Not directly over the PNW.    Probably more offshore.

 

We don't ever spend July and August with 552DM heights.    And that is what is shown next week.  

 

That is not going to be the norm in July regardless of what your data indicates.    It just does not happen.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.   The troughing seems to just dissolve later next week.    

 

Looking over 500mb patterns for so many periods in June in history as I have done in the past... that seems to be the most likely evolution as well.  

 

A bit dramatic. It weakens a bit but the general trough position remains the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just typical intraseasonal wavefield fluctuations.

 

Heights will rise into AK/far NPAC following the secession of EPAC/WHEM forcing next week, so the anomalously deep troughing (locally) will relax for a few weeks. It's temporary, however, and it will reinitiate.

 

There will probably be a further consolidation of EHEM/Niña forcing and -AAM/-PNA in July, so not only will toughing return, but it'll probably be more "anomalous" than the upcoming period, relatively speaking.

 

This sounds great. Hope you are right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit dramatic. It weakens a bit but the general trough position remains the same.

 

Right... dissolves.   Does not move.   Just gradually weakens. 

 

http://stream.ecmwf.int/data/atls06/data/data01/scratch/ps2png-atls06-95e2cf679cd58ee9b4db4dd119a05a8d-67bAfj.png

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not directly over the PNW.    Probably more offshore.

 

We don't spend July and August with 552DM heights ever.    And that is what is shown next week.  

 

That is not going to be the norm in July regardless of what your data indicates.    It just does not happen. 

 

Based on your preferences? Or something substantial and actually worth debating?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not directly over the PNW. Probably more offshore.

 

We don't spend July and August with 552DM heights ever. And that is what is shown next week.

 

That is not going to be the norm in July regardless of what your data indicates. It just does not happen.

Nope, heights will be biased higher offshore through the remainer of summer (-PNA) with NW flow @ 500mb across the NEPAC.

 

There will not be an Aleutian/NPAC low in the means during J/A/S. Quite the opposite, actually.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right... dissolves.   Does not move.   Just gradually weakens. 

 

 

Whatever helps you ridge at night.

 

I do like the way the North Pacific high is keeping that ridiculous blob of heat over Arizona/New Mexico at bay. Hopefully it gets shunted east eventually and the southern Plains fry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on your preferences? Or something substantial and actually worth debating?

The idea of an Aleutian/NPAC trough (+PNA) is utterly ridiculous and will not come to fruition.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, heights will be biased higher offshore through the remainer of summer (-PNA). There will not be an Aleutian/NPAC low in the means during J/A/S. Quite the opposite, actually.

 

 

Have to go into meeting... no time to debate.

 

Based on that then... we must be expecting a July and August with highs in the 50s and 60s here.     Good luck with that forecast.   

 

What happened in 1988?   That was a JAS full of 70s and 80s and sunshine here with almost no rain... and a few excursions into the 90s.  

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on your preferences? Or something substantial and actually worth debating?

 

 

OK.    150 years of history.  

 

I am talking about evolving into you a summer pattern you will love.   

 

Who is forecasting -7 or -10 departures for JAS?    :lol:

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...