Jump to content

February 2021 PacNW Weather Discussion


BLI snowman

Recommended Posts

This is a really fascinating scenario coming up.  When the NAO and PNA blocks merge with each other it allows energy to freely pass from one block to the other.  The challenge for the models will be to decipher how the transfer of energy will evolve.  I'm just pleased we have a realistic shot at a good outcome when all is said and and done.  I'm not getting as worked up about this as in the past, because I'm getting it shown to me in no uncertain terms over the past year there are things more important than cold weather.

For now I'm just enjoying seeing some great possibilities in the model world.

  • Like 3

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2023-24 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 1.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 1

Total Hail = 0.0

Total Ice = 0.2

Coldest Low = 13

Lows 32 or below = 45

Highs 32 or below = 3

Lows 20 or below = 3

Highs 40 or below = 9

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SEA is now at 32% of the average rainfall for the entire month of February... and we just started the second day of the month.  

Just need another 2.47 over the next 27 days to get to normal.     🙂

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty significant cold snap on the 12z GFS.  Did anyone really think the 0z would be where the model roller coaster would stop?

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2023-24 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 1.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 1

Total Hail = 0.0

Total Ice = 0.2

Coldest Low = 13

Lows 32 or below = 45

Highs 32 or below = 3

Lows 20 or below = 3

Highs 40 or below = 9

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, snow_wizard said:

Pretty significant cold snap on the 12z GFS.  Did anyone really think the 0z would be where the model roller coaster would stop?

Does anyone really think the 12Z run will verify either?  😄

  • Like 1
  • scream 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredible TRENDZ

  • Troll 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SilverFallsAndrew said:

Incredible TRENDZ

This is one time when there aren't really any trends.   Each run seems to be completely opposite of the last run. 

  • Like 3

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SilverFallsAndrew said:

Incredible TRENDZ

I think you mean #TRENDZ

Home Weather Station Stats for 2023

High - Satans Bunghole

Lowest High - Not sure

Low - I don't have the data

Sub 40 highs - Not quite

Sub-freezing highs - Try again

Lows below 25 - You're joking

Lows below 20 - No

2023 Snowfall - LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SNOW

gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_nwus_64.png

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TigerWoodsLibido said:

Was anybody else below normal for rainfall in Jan? I ask because it seems weird that we were over an inch below normal here and I am looking through ACIS and can’t find any stations even close. Maybe the weather station at KEUG is busted.

Rainfall total for January in Medford was 1.98 of an inch. Normal is 2.43 so 0.45 of an inch below average. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tyler Mode said:

I keep seeing these maps from 10-14 days away...but looking at the ensembles, you'd be a fool to believe anything past day 5 at this point.

Ain't that the truth!  As long as things are extremely blocky we have an above average chance of scoring...especially given the base state and the MJO wave.  Last night I was thinking about why I'm so confident we will score before it's over...

1. cold ENSO

2. positive QBO

3. favorable MJO

4. second half of La Nina winter

5. first half of La Nina winter torched (very often leads to big second half or late winter)

6. extreme weather happening in the Eastern United States (usually precedes us getting hit in a Nina winter)

7. recent Siberian SSW event

8. recent major blocking and major blocking projected to continue

In short if we don't get hit it would really be defying the odds.  No question that has happened before, but this is about as good as it gets for number of aces in the deck so to speak.

  • Like 1

Death To Warm Anomalies!

 

Winter 2023-24 stats

 

Total Snowfall = 1.0"

Day with 1" or more snow depth = 1

Total Hail = 0.0

Total Ice = 0.2

Coldest Low = 13

Lows 32 or below = 45

Highs 32 or below = 3

Lows 20 or below = 3

Highs 40 or below = 9

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, snow_wizard said:

Ain't that the truth!  As long as things are extremely blocky we have an above average chance of scoring...especially given the base state and the MJO wave.  Last night I was thinking about why I'm so confident we will score before it's over...

1. cold ENSO

2. positive QBO

3. favorable MJO

4. second half of La Nina winter

5. first half of La Nina winter torched (very often leads to big second half or late winter)

6. extreme weather happening in the Eastern United States (usually precedes us getting hit in a Nina winter)

7. recent Siberian SSW event

8. recent major blocking and major blocking projected to continue

In short if we don't get hit it would really be defying the odds.  No question that has happened before, but this is about as good as it gets for number of aces in the deck so to speak.

You do make a good point on 5. In late January of 2019 the Plains and Midwest got a massive Arctic blast. What happened afterwards?

Models have hinted for a long time now that this may be a multiple barreled event. The pattern is finally favorable to build cold in western Canada and that’s what we want to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is raining rather aggressively outside currently. Honestly might even be a little texture it in with temps around 40F. 0.18" on the day, 2.80" in the last three days. Looks like we could get another 1"+ in the next day.

Home Wx Station Stats (Since January 2008):

Max Temp: 96.3F (2009)   Min Temp: 2.0F (2008)   Max Wind Gust: 45 mph (2018, 2021)   Wettest Day: 2.34 (11/4/22)   Avg Yearly Precip: 37"   10yr Avg Snow: 8.0"

Snowfall Totals

'08-09: 30" | '09-10: 0.5" | '10-11: 21" | '11-12: 9.5" | '12-13: 0.2" | '13-14: 6.2" | '14-15: 0.0" | '15-16: 0.25"| '16-17: 8.0" | '17-18: 0.9"| '18-19: 11.5" | '19-20: 11" | '20-21: 10.5" | '21-22: 21.75" | '22-23: 10.0" 

2023-24: 7.0" (1/17: 3", 1/18: 1.5", 2/26: 0.5", 3/4: 2.0", Flakes: 1/11, 1/16)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really good news today. Keep it coming!

  • Snow 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue is that the block is rapidly floating away on the ECMWF... and this has been a theme over the last couple runs.  

That block is making a beeline for the arctic circle on the 12Z ECMWF and that is a deal killer for us.

 

ecmwf-deterministic-namer-z500_anom-2785600 (1).png

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

The issue is that the block is rapidly floating away on the ECMWF... and this has been a theme over the last couple runs.  

That block is making a beeline for the arctic circle on the 12Z ECMWF and that is a deal killer for us.

 

ecmwf-deterministic-namer-z500_anom-2785600 (1).png

I don't trust what happens after 120hrs much when there's such big changes. But yes that is a problem, that trough needs to go south not west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

The issue is that the block is rapidly floating away on the ECMWF... and this has been a theme over the last couple runs.  

That block is making a beeline for the arctic circle on the 12Z ECMWF and that is a deal killer for us.

 

ecmwf-deterministic-namer-z500_anom-2785600 (1).png

The block will float away, and we'll get lots of rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snowdrift said:

The block will float away, and we'll get lots of rain.

Yeah... that is what this run shows.

12Z ECMWF has highs in the upper 40s on Sunday and mid 40s on Monday in the Seattle area with rain and those are the days with the coldest air mass before the block vanishes.

 

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

The issue is that the block is rapidly floating away on the ECMWF... and this has been a theme over the last couple runs.  

That block is making a beeline for the arctic circle on the 12Z ECMWF and that is a deal killer for us.

 

ecmwf-deterministic-namer-z500_anom-2785600 (1).png

You’re gonna have to wait awhile for spring, my friend.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Phil said:

You’re gonna have to wait awhile for spring, my friend.

And this is related to the current discussion of the next 10 days how?

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

The issue is that the block is rapidly floating away on the ECMWF... and this has been a theme over the last couple runs.  

That block is making a beeline for the arctic circle on the 12Z ECMWF and that is a deal killer for us.

 

ecmwf-deterministic-namer-z500_anom-2785600 (1).png

Just one day later... the block is completely gone.   It starts the process of floating away on day 3 and by day 7 its off the map onto the side of the globe.  

 

ecmwf-deterministic-namer-z500_anom-2872000.png

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Snowdrift said:

They've got another gnarly looking storm waiting in the wings.

prateptype_cat_ecmwf.conus.pngprateptype_cat_ecmwf.conus.png

12z Ecmwf not backing off with the big Nor’easter on Super Bowl Sunday. I can’t imagine anything that would suck more than this for New England. Getting slammed with snow and not being able to watch Tom Brady win his 7th Super Bowl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MossMan said:

Tim is not onboard. 
Andrew is onboard. 

Its just that we have to perfectly thread the needle as the block shifts rapidly northward (shown on all models now)... that is what the GFS showed.   But the GEFS and the ECMWF disagree.   It seems like a tall order to me.     I would be more optimistic if the block was solid and stable... but that is not what is shown in the models.

  • Like 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...