Jump to content

PNW February 2023 Weather Discussion - Meteorological winter finale


Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, smerfylicious said:

If the WRF verifies, this will be a C+ for me at best. One good shot of snow in November and nothing since.

Yeah this will downgrade to C territory for me if this next event ends up like last night. I have higher hopes though because temps will be a bit colder and it definitely has more boom potential than bust.

(Previous name: MillCreekMike)

Everett, WA (elev. 180’)

2023-2024 Snowfall:

1/11: Tr.

1/18: Tr.

Go M’s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TT-SEA said:

ECMWF for Tuesday system

ecmwf-deterministic-washington-snow_24hr_kuchera-7639600.png

It's amazing how consistently stingy that model is for snow up here. I guess it's usually right, but even when we get nailed the ECMWF is usually the last to pick up on it and shows the smallest totals. It seems a lot more variable run to run in what it shows down there. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SouthHillFrosty said:

D0AFC25C-6F43-4581-BC55-D09BED0EE9A3.gif

Look at that tiny green snowhole right over where Fife is, surrounded by blue in Tacoma and Federal Way. It's so on par 😂

  • Sad 2

𝘐𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘴,

𝘐 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘰𝘸𝘯.

𝘗𝘶𝘺𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘶𝘱.

Reddit: HotlineMaestro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Cold Snap said:

06z NAM 3km is a boom for me.

85AA16CD-8C12-4C89-B8EE-6114EE5E3A2B.png

Same here! Looks juicy for tomorrow night.

  • Like 2

Weather stats for MBY

Snowfall:

-Total snowfall since joining: 50.25"

-2018-19: 21"

-2019-20: 2.5"

-2020-21: 13"

-2021-22: 8.75"

-2022-23: 5.75"

-2023-24*: 0.25"

-Most recent snowfall: 0.25”; January 17th, 2024

-Largest snowfall (single storm): 8.5"; February 12-13, 2021

-Largest snow depth: 14"; 1:30am February 12th, 2019

Temperatures:

-Warmest: 109F; June 28th, 2021

-Coldest: 13F; December 27th, 2021

-Phreeze Count 2023-24: 31

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Winterdog said:

The GFS is just an awful model for snow totals.  I actually started to think the more it showed the better chance for snow.  Not true.  That model's output for snowfall is not much better than a random generator.  34 after a low of 32.7

Yeah it’s a piece of garbage. You’re better off ignoring it and relying solely on Euro/EPS and CMC as far as globals are concerned.

15 hours ago, Timmy Supercell said:

You all enjoying that snow guys? 

Still hasn't really snowed at all here other than that one day in December. And more thunderstorms might be on the way tomorrow. 

I think late March could be interesting for some early season severe. Some more zonal momentum will get into the CONUS after the mid-March cold wave.

13 hours ago, Phishy Wx said:

Nino's can be good, I mean in the inverse CA is currently scoring big time in a Nina when its statistically dry there in Ninas.  Maybe we'll get a modoki or something hybrid ish/neutral

CA is scoring largely due to the -NAO/-PNA tandem forcing troughs to dig south upon reaching the west coast. Opposite of the +TNH/Hudson Bay vortex pattern that leaves CA high and dry.

10 hours ago, MossMan said:

I can literally see the CZ to my south while I am still sunny…My old house is probably getting nailed right now! 😡

41 degrees, DP down to 28. 

1FBB9B78-49A1-4A50-97AD-E8166E72124E.jpeg

Still haven’t fixed that tree. 😉 

8 hours ago, Phishy Wx said:

 

Yeppers. Euro is titanium strong.

1 hour ago, Cold Snap said:

Oh how the tables have turned.

That’s pretty effing wild. Wonder how much longer it can run..seems to be a big shake-up after the super niño in 2015/16.

  • Like 2
  • lol 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something is really off about the pattern evolution this year. Usually I can recognize homogeneities in the pattern(s) from year to year, but I feel like I’m flying blind now.

Of course February was easy to predict due to a compilation of canonical forcings, and it’s clear there will be increasing momentum/pacific jet influence late in March given standard transports of AAM, but this isn’t the sequence or timing that I would expect from muscle memory.

It’s brand spanking new!

  • Popcorn 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.png

Make this make sense @Phil. How does this sounding match with the depicted weather?? #gooooooooooooofus

Weather stats for MBY

Snowfall:

-Total snowfall since joining: 50.25"

-2018-19: 21"

-2019-20: 2.5"

-2020-21: 13"

-2021-22: 8.75"

-2022-23: 5.75"

-2023-24*: 0.25"

-Most recent snowfall: 0.25”; January 17th, 2024

-Largest snowfall (single storm): 8.5"; February 12-13, 2021

-Largest snow depth: 14"; 1:30am February 12th, 2019

Temperatures:

-Warmest: 109F; June 28th, 2021

-Coldest: 13F; December 27th, 2021

-Phreeze Count 2023-24: 31

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Phil said:

Something is really off about the pattern evolution this year. Usually I can recognize homogeneities in the pattern(s) from year to year, but I feel like I’m flying blind now.

Of course February was easy to predict due to a compilation of canonical forcings, and it’s clear there will be increasing momentum/pacific jet influence late in March given standard transports of AAM, but this isn’t the sequence or timing that I would expect from muscle memory.

It’s brand spanking new!

"At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

  • Like 1
  • lol 3
  • Shivering 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GHweatherChris said:

"At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

I swear that was the clonazepam talking. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, TacomaWx said:

Looks like I slept through the night and woke up at the right time…33 here and precip is moving in. Not sure how heavy it is. Unfortunately gotta drive to Redmond this morning so won’t be home for it.

Yea looks like a huge slug of precip moving in now. Might complicate the morning commute for some. 

  • Excited 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ECMWF showed 28 at SEA this morning... but its actually 35.    However the dewpoint is 27 and the flow will stay offshore today so what falls should be snow.  

  • Like 4

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

12Z NAM is way north of its 00Z run for tomorrow.   Mainly a north Sound event on this run.   But its the NAM.

nam-218-all-washington-snow_24hr_kuchera-7628800.png

What time are the festivities supposed to start up this way? 

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MossMan said:

What time are the festivities supposed to start up this way? 

Well if we are following the NAM... a light band of snow around mid-day today and then the main band of precip reaches the Seattle area by 10 p.m. and up there by 1 a.m. and then it sort of parks itself up there all morning tomorrow.   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SnowWillarrive said:

Glad the NAM will be wrong 

Yeah... best to go with ECMWF.   Precip doesn't shift as far north tomorrow so both the Seattle and Randy get in on the fun.    Although there is that annoying donut hole showing up for the south Sound even on the ECMWF.

ecmwf-deterministic-washington-snow_24hr_kuchera-7639600 (1).png

  • Like 3
  • Excited 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t have much to say at this point. Looks like we should at least get several inches tonight. After that things remain cool and unsettled, but there isn’t one day or pattern that is locked in for snow, but likely some decent chances. The pattern later this week through the weekend looks chilly, but the trough is a bit offshore and digs pretty far into CA with a lot of the moisture. Maybe if it ends up being centered more over us there will be additional snow chances. That period around the 10th looks intriguing too, but the lowlands are really battling climo by then. 

  • Like 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TacomaWx said:

Not sure what to make of the models…all over the place for tonight. Getting about an inch atleast seems likely still. Probably just need to watch on radar as it comes in since we still won’t have it resolved today it looks like. 

These weak surface low set ups are pretty much impossible for the models to handle accurately.   

  • Like 2

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...