Jump to content

October 2022 PNW weather Discussion. + Ultimate Leg Reveal Extravaganza


TacomaWx

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Skagit Weather said:

It takes forever to get there though. The next week is still relatively dry in Washington (of course still way wetter than anything we've seen so far).

Exactly. It always gets pushed out. Friday night once looked really wet for all. So did Sunday night. Now, it’s the middle of next week. It eventually will be, but we need it yesterday. Actually, we need it six weeks ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 00Z ECMWF was not exactly crazy wet.   There is a big pattern change coming and the air will be clean again and the fires should be out... but not sure about making up rainfall deficits yet.    Although the 00Z EPS and control run hinted at flat ridging and some sort of AR event for SW BC and western WA after day 10 which would quickly make up for lost ground.

ecmwf-deterministic-namer-qpf_anom_10day-7001600 (2).png

  • Like 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, JBolin said:

People on Nextdoor "speculating" is like a six y/o telling me he has proof dinosaurs exsist because he watched Jurrasic Park.

There was also a video from someone's door bell 🤷🏼‍♀️. But I feel most of nextdoor is where all the Karen's congregate. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Blob said:

FB_IMG_1666182834561.jpg

FB_IMG_1666182832339.jpg

This smoke situation is going out with a miserable bang.     The I-5 corridor is trapped in hell right now... there is not enough east wind to mix things up but there is also very little onshore flow either with warm air aloft preventing ventilation upward.  Just a stew of thick smoke accumulating from all the new fire starts over the weekend.

Good news is that the smoke is going to be thoroughly scoured out by tomorrow well before the rain event arrives on Friday.

 

trc1_NW_sfc_f041.png

  • Like 4

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Blob said:

People on next door are reporting a bomb thrown from a car. 

Screenshot_20221019-043815_Nextdoor.jpg

Oh, it sure the heck sounded like a bomb. I still cannot believe it. I can still hear that "rumble" as the percussion blast wave moved outward from the explosion then hit my house and all others around here too. If it wasn't a bomb thrown from car which would be very strange, could a butane oil explosion be that powerful? I hope there is more reported this morning on it. Thanks!

12z ECMWF in 4 hours 45 minutes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

The 00Z ECMWF was not exactly crazy wet.   There is a big pattern change coming and the air will be clean again and the fires should be out... but not sure about making up rainfall deficits yet.    Although the 00Z EPS and control run hinted at flat ridging and some sort of AR event for SW BC and western WA after day 10 which would quickly make up for lost ground.

ecmwf-deterministic-namer-qpf_anom_10day-7001600 (2).png

The Op runs after Day 6 aren't handling things well, especially precip. Look how wet all three ensemble camps are. If they are right it starts raining Friday and doesn't stop into the first week of November. Maybe even longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DJ Droppin said:

The Op runs after Day 6 aren't handling things well, especially precip. Look how wet all three ensemble camps are. If they are right it starts raining Friday and doesn't stop into the first week of November. Maybe even longer.

Its definitely going to be wetter... but I don't think its going to be just constant rain for 2+ weeks.  The ensembles tend to blend everything together while the operational runs give a better picture of the details and timing.     If we get into a flat ridging situation in the 10-15 day period then we might have some serious rain... which would make sense given that last 4 months of almost totally dry weather and also its the time of the year for AR events.

  • Like 3

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TT-SEA said:

Its definitely going to be wetter... but I don't think its going to be just constant rain for 2+ weeks.  The ensembles tend to blend everything together while the operational runs give a better picture of the details and timing.     If we get into a flat ridging situation in the 10-15 day period then we might have some serious rain... which would make sense given that last 4 months of almost totally dry weather and also its the time of the year for AR events.

Yeah, I'm sure there will be some lulls, but not for long. Maybe if we're lucky one completely dry day in between systems. What a contrast and the fact we're even saying this is a very nice change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DJ Droppin said:

Yeah, I'm sure there will be some lulls, but not for long. Maybe if we're lucky one completely dry day in between systems. What a contrast and the fact we're even saying this is a very nice change.

For the Seattle area... most of Saturday and Sunday looks fairly dry at this point.    

But we are definitely getting to the point in the year when it normally rains on most days with just short breaks in between.  

  • Rain 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, DJ Droppin said:

Dry weather sucks.

Balance is nice.    Too much wet or dry sucks.

Soon you will be loving that dry east wind.   👍

  • Excited 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AQI is currently somewhere between 250 and 300 outside right now. I've seen it above 400 here so not quite the worst I've ever recorded, but this morning is going to be really unpleasant out there.

  • Sick 2

Home Wx Station Stats (Since January 2008):

Max Temp: 96.3F (2009)   Min Temp: 2.0F (2008)   Max Wind Gust: 45 mph (2018, 2021)   Wettest Day: 2.34 (11/4/22)   Avg Yearly Precip: 37"   10yr Avg Snow: 8.0"

Snowfall Totals

'08-09: 30" | '09-10: 0.5" | '10-11: 21" | '11-12: 9.5" | '12-13: 0.2" | '13-14: 6.2" | '14-15: 0.0" | '15-16: 0.25"| '16-17: 8.0" | '17-18: 0.9"| '18-19: 11.5" | '19-20: 11" | '20-21: 10.5" | '21-22: 21.75" | '22-23: 10.0" 

2023-24: 7.0" (1/17: 3", 1/18: 1.5", 2/26: 0.5", 3/4: 2.0", Flakes: 1/11, 1/16)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Skagit Weather said:

AQI is currently somewhere between 250 and 300 outside right now. I've seen it above 400 here so not quite the worst I've ever recorded, but this morning is going to be really unpleasant out there.

Looks like your area starts to get cleared out somewhat this afternoon.   Have to wait until tomorrow down here.  

trc1_NW_sfc_f012.png

  • Like 2
  • Sick 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TT-SEA said:

Looks like your area starts to get cleared out somewhat this afternoon.   Have to wait until tomorrow down here.  

trc1_NW_sfc_f012.png

Could you post the current map of what it looks like right now? 

Elevation 580’ Location a few miles east of I-5 on the Snohomish Co side of the Snohomish/Skagit border. I love snow/cold AND sun/warmth! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hawkstwelve said:

Added a new shivering reaction gif in preparation for the coming winter. 

A pre-Christmas arctic blast with 9 inches of snow and single digit temps is all but certain now. You're welcome.

The forum needs to have a smoke and/or fire react in preparation for the coming summer.

  • Like 5
It's called clown range for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently 42F and cool outside. Heater season will probably start this weekend.

  • Like 1

Garfield County/Pomeroy, WA:

2023-2024 Snowfall totals: 14.3 inches

HIghest snow total (per event): 5.8 inches total 1/11/24 - 1/12/24.

Most recent accumulation (non trace): 0.20 inches on 2/26/24

Days with  trace or more snowfall: 12/01/23 (0.60), 1/8/24 (1.0), 1/10/24 (3.5), 1/11/23 (3.5 inches with Thundersnow; separate event from prior day), 1/12/24 (2.30). 1/14/24 (T), 1/17/24 (1.20 inches), 1/18/24 (1.5 inches), 1/19/24 (0.20), 2/09/24 (0.30), 2/26/24 (0.20-mainly graupel), 4/5/24 (T)

First Freeze: 10/27/2023

Last Sub freezing Day: 1/20/24 (12th) (8 days in a row from 1/12/24-1/20/24)

Coldest low: -12F (!!!!!!!!) (1/12/24)

Last White Christmas: 2022 at my location (on ground)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hawkstwelve said:

Added a new shivering reaction gif in preparation for the coming winter. 

A pre-Christmas arctic blast with 9 inches of snow and single digit temps is all but certain now. You're welcome.

I've already accepted that last Christmas was the pinnacle of Christmas weather, but that doesn't mean we can't do it again this year!

  • Like 1

Home Wx Station Stats (Since January 2008):

Max Temp: 96.3F (2009)   Min Temp: 2.0F (2008)   Max Wind Gust: 45 mph (2018, 2021)   Wettest Day: 2.34 (11/4/22)   Avg Yearly Precip: 37"   10yr Avg Snow: 8.0"

Snowfall Totals

'08-09: 30" | '09-10: 0.5" | '10-11: 21" | '11-12: 9.5" | '12-13: 0.2" | '13-14: 6.2" | '14-15: 0.0" | '15-16: 0.25"| '16-17: 8.0" | '17-18: 0.9"| '18-19: 11.5" | '19-20: 11" | '20-21: 10.5" | '21-22: 21.75" | '22-23: 10.0" 

2023-24: 7.0" (1/17: 3", 1/18: 1.5", 2/26: 0.5", 3/4: 2.0", Flakes: 1/11, 1/16)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JBolin said:

Yes, as it's illegal for ANY aircraft including military to go supersonic below FL-60T as the restricted/controlled airspace extends from the surface to FL-60T.

There are some "exceptions" that allow for TFR's that permit supersonic speed, i.e. national security issues, unresponsive aircraft and external domestic threats.

The last time the FAA allowed unrestricted access for supersonic flight below the aforementioned FL's was 9/11/2001

There has been at least one "authorized" supersonic flight (in the name of national security) since 9/11 and it was in 2010 right here in the PNW:

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/fighter-jets-scramble-sonic-booms-rattle-puget-sound-area/

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ddeVc7CnTg

 

I found an article back when it happened that gave a specific time line, and I want to say the got "on scene" in something like 12 or 16 minutes after wheels up.  This article says "before 2pm" which would be less than 22 minutes.  I have no idea how to calculate the speed curve for that, but the average is between 480 mph and 645mph.  I think the F-15C tops out at around 1,800-1,900mph.  I'm guessing they got pretty close to that before they put on the brakes.

I remember witness accounts saying that the take off profile was completely different.  Usually they take off and fly runway heading for a few miles before turning.  On this day, they were turning north before the gear was even stowed and flew over Vancouver at pretty low level in full burner.

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rubus Leucodermis said:

Last Christmas was a pretty special one all right.

PC254036_scaled.jpg.25e41daa2b1b69ff3605a377e998f880.jpg

Gorgeous!

  • Like 2

Cold Season 2023/24:

Total snowfall: 26"

Highest daily snowfall: 5"

Deepest snow depth: 12"

Coldest daily high: -20ºF

Coldest daily low: -42ºF

Number of subzero days: 5

Personal Weather Station on Wunderground: 

https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KMTBOZEM152#history

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Tim is in the denial stage. 

  • Popcorn 2
  • scream 1

Snowfall                                  Precip

2022-23: 95.0"                      2022-23: 17.39"

2021-22: 52.6"                    2021-22: 91.46" 

2020-21: 12.0"                    2020-21: 71.59"

2019-20: 23.5"                   2019-20: 58.54"

2018-19: 63.5"                   2018-19: 66.33"

2017-18: 30.3"                   2017-18: 59.83"

2016-17: 49.2"                   2016-17: 97.58"

2015-16: 11.75"                 2015-16: 68.67"

2014-15: 3.5"
2013-14: 11.75"                  2013-14: 62.30
2012-13: 16.75"                 2012-13: 78.45  

2011-12: 98.5"                   2011-12: 92.67"

It's always sunny at Winters Hill! 
Fighting the good fight against weather evil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SilverFallsAndrew said:

I see Tim is in the denial stage. 

Silly comment.   

Looks like more normal weather ahead and its beyond overdue.   I am really tired of smoke.   

  • Like 1
  • Popcorn 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, High Desert Mat? said:

Isn’t he always? Moss growing weather inbound!!!

Warm season is over... we always have wet weather from November - March.    We got more than our money's worth this warm season.    Way too much of a good thing.     

Side note... we are going to be in Florida for almost half of November.    ;)

  • Popcorn 1
  • Weenie 4

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The smoke is ridiculously thick east of 405 this morning.   Looks like thick fog on the traffic cams.   This is very similar to the worst of the smoke in September 2020.    Absolutely disgusting.  

  • Sick 2
  • Weenie 1

**REPORTED CONDITIONS AND ANOMALIES ARE NOT MEANT TO IMPLY ANYTHING ON A REGIONAL LEVEL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Chewbacca Defense said:

There has been at least one "authorized" supersonic flight (in the name of national security) since 9/11 and it was in 2010 right here in the PNW:

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/fighter-jets-scramble-sonic-booms-rattle-puget-sound-area/

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ddeVc7CnTg

 

I found an article back when it happened that gave a specific time line, and I want to say the got "on scene" in something like 12 or 16 minutes after wheels up.  This article says "before 2pm" which would be less than 22 minutes.  I have no idea how to calculate the speed curve for that, but the average is between 480 mph and 645mph.  I think the F-15C tops out at around 1,800-1,900mph.  I'm guessing they got pretty close to that before they put on the brakes.

I remember witness accounts saying that the take off profile was completely different.  Usually they take off and fly runway heading for a few miles before turning.  On this day, they were turning north before the gear was even stowed and flew over Vancouver at pretty low level in full burner.

 

 

IIRC that "scramble" was due to a private pilot violating the TFR in place within Class-B airspace because of the President's visit. 

Needless to say, both of those pilots got an a** chewing after their return. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, JBolin said:

IIRC that "scramble" was due to a private pilot violating the TFR in place within Class-B airspace because of the President's visit. 

Needless to say, both of those pilots got an a** chewing after their return. 

Yeah it was a seaplane pilot who had been on a fishing trip off the grid in Eastern Washington and didn't bother/probably wasn't able to check the TFRs before flying back in. 

 

When you say "both pilots" who are you referring to?  I believe the F-15 pilots had authorization to step on the loud pedal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chewbacca Defense said:

Yeah it was a seaplane pilot who had been on a fishing trip off the grid in Eastern Washington and didn't bother/probably wasn't able to check the TFRs before flying back in. 

 

When you say "both pilots" who are you referring to?  I believe the F-15 pilots had authorization to step on the loud pedal.

They "did" between Mt. St. Helen's and Mt. Rainier. NO authorization north or south of those two points.

It was later verified by the USAF, both pilots had been vernally reprimanded for violating FAA rules outside a posted TFR.

I.E. they continued to go supersonic beyond their approved area/s.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JBolin said:

They "did" between Mt. St. Helen's and Mt. Rainier. NO authorization north or south of those two points.

It was later verified by the USAF, both pilots had been vernally reprimanded for violating FAA rules outside a posted TFR.

Ah....I was not aware of that.  You ever find anything about how fast they got? 

 

Growing up in Georgia, the local news crew did a special feature when the ANG unit in Atlanta became the first ANG unit to get the F15.  The reporter went for a ride and they had a camera pointed out the back for a high performance take off.  You saw the ground moving past as they released the brakes and rolled down the runway, then everything tilted a bit as they rotated, then the next thing you know the camera is looking straight down at the runway numbers which get really small really quick.  I had it saved on VHS but the tape eventually died.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...